BenzingaT3·34mo ago
RMCO Royalty Management Holding Corporation Class A Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
RMCO
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- PATENT OWNERS & LESSORS (6794) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- List Date
- 2023-11-06
- CIK
- 0001843656
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-12
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.01) (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Fishers, IN
- Homepage
- https://www.royaltymgmtcorp.com
Royalty Management Holding Corp is formed to invest or purchase assets that have near and medium-term income potential to provide RMC with accretive cash flow from which it can reinvest in new assets or expand cash flow from those existing assets. These assets typically are natural resources assets (including real estate and mining permits), patents, intellectual property, and emerging technologies.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -21.66% | 12.50% | 33.77% | 8.20% |
| Feb | -- | 39.20% | -11.28% | -7.28% | 6.88% |
| Mar | -- | -23.68% | 9.90% | -24.62% | -12.80% |
| Apr | -- | -25.64% | 6.42% | -6.73% | -8.65% |
| May | -- | 28.72% | -3.95% | -19.30% | 1.82% |
| Jun | -- | -41.66% | 15.89% | -1.13% | -8.97% |
| Jul | -- | 25.00% | 1.54% | -16.61% | 3.31% |
| Aug | -- | -13.88% | 65.93% | 28.70% | 26.92% |
| Sep | -- | 8.50% | 1.44% | -12.06% | -0.71% |
| Oct | -- | 13.07% | 44.50% | -12.99%* | 14.86% |
| Nov | -60.46% | -5.50% | -35.87% | -- | -33.94% |
| Dec | -46.88% | 1.84% | 27.69% | -- | -5.78% |
| Total | -79.00% | -40.93% | 162.78% | -42.86% | -0.00% |
* Only 4 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $2.42
SMA 50: $2.63
SMA 200: $2.96
Current: $2.21
EMA 12: $2.33
EMA 26: $2.44
MACD: -0.1074 | Signal: -0.0191
BEARISH
ADX (14): 24.60
WEAK TREND
+DI: 15.69
−DI: 22.30
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 32.14
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 11.06
Stoch %D: 13.14
Williams %R: -87.47
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $2.66
BB Lower: $2.17
NEUTRAL
OBV: 4,119,503
Vol SMA 20: 8,133
Vol ROC: -49.98%
ATR: $0.13
True Range: $0.17
HV 20: 36.6%
HV 30: 34.6%
HV 60: 59.5%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-25T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for RMCO:
Executive Summary
- Overall assessment: NEUTRAL (confidence level 6/10)
- Key drivers: recent news headlines, technical signals
- Primary risks: volatility, negative sentiment
- Investment thesis: RMCO's current price level presents a mixed bag of technical and fundamental indicators. While the stock has exhibited high volatility, its beta remains relatively high compared to the market. This suggests potential for significant moves.
- Recent news sentiment impact: The recent headlines are generally neutral, with no significant events or announcements that could be driving the stock's movement.
Technical Analysis
- Trend direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH
- Medium-term (1-3 months): RANGE-bound
- Long-term (3-12 months): UPTRENDING
- Support/Resistance levels: $2.29, $2.56, $2.84
- Momentum signals:
- RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (42.43)
- MACD signal: BEARISH (crossover below signal line)
- Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL (price within range)
- Volume analysis: VOLUME SMA 20 is declining, indicating a potential reversal.
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent headlines summary:
- Neutral news headlines with no significant events or announcements that could be driving the stock's movement.
- Sentiment assessment: NEUTRAL
- Catalyst identification: No upcoming earnings or product launches that could impact the stock's price.
- Market narrative: The recent news headlines are not providing a clear catalyst for RMCO's price movement.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta interpretation: HIGH RISK (beta 1.31 vs SPY)
- Volatility regime: HIGH VOLUME
- Options market signals:
- IV rank: N/A (no options data available)
- Put/call ratios: N/A (no options data available)
- Unusual activity: N/A (no options data available)
- Downside protection: Support levels at $2.29 and $2.56
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector performance: RMCO is performing relatively weakly compared to its sector.
- Institutional activity: No significant institutional interest or volume patterns suggesting institutional activity.
- Correlation analysis: RMCO has a low correlation with the market, indicating potential for independent price movement.
- Relative valuation: The stock's recent price action suggests it may be trading within a range.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical price levels:
- Support at $2.29 and $2.56
- Resistance at $2.84
- Breakout/breakdown levels: A break above $2.84 or below $2.29 could indicate significant price movement.
- Time-sensitive catalysts: No upcoming earnings or product launches that could impact the stock's price.
- Risk management: Consider setting stop-loss levels around $2.25 and adjusting position size based on volatility.
Additional Comments
- The recent news headlines are not providing a clear catalyst for RMCO's price movement, which may be contributing to its current range-bound trading pattern.
- The high beta and volatility suggest potential for significant price movements, but also increase the risk of losses.
- Further analysis is required to determine whether RMCO's current price level presents an attractive buying opportunity or if it may continue to trade within a range.
Generated
News
All RMCO news →
BenzingaT3·34mo ago
BenzingaT3·34mo ago
BenzingaT3·34mo ago
BenzingaT3·34mo ago
BenzingaT3·34mo ago
BenzingaT3·36mo ago
BenzingaT3·36mo ago
BenzingaT3·36mo ago
RMCO Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.2740
Alpha: -7.44%
Correlation: 0.1764
R-Squared: 3.1%
Stock Volatility: 92.1%
Market Volatility: 12.8%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own RMCO
1 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $65K | #5939 of 6285 | -29.4% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
RMCO Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
RMCO Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jan 3, 2025The company's insiders have not filed since Jan 3, 2025; this reflects that date.
Directors 3
- Kirk Patrick Taylor · since Mar 17, 2021
- Mark C. Jensen · since Mar 17, 2021
- Thomas M. Sauve · since Mar 17, 2021
Officers 2
- Mark C. Jensen · Chairman and CEO · since Mar 17, 2021
- Thomas M. Sauve · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Nov 2023
Changes in the last 10 years (13)
| Feb 1, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Kirk Patrick Taylor as President and CFO in an SEC filing |
| Nov 2, 2023 | Thomas M. Sauve first listed as Chief Executive Officer in an SEC filing |
| Mar 23, 2023 | Aqr Capital Management LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2023 | AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2023 | AQR Arbitrage LLC reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Nov 7, 2022 | Aqr Capital Management LLC became a 10% owner |
| Nov 7, 2022 | AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Nov 7, 2022 | AQR Arbitrage LLC became a 10% owner |
| Mar 17, 2021 | Thomas M. Sauve became a director |
| Mar 17, 2021 | Mark C. Jensen became a director |
| Mar 17, 2021 | Mark C. Jensen became Chairman and CEO |
| Mar 17, 2021 | Kirk Patrick Taylor became a director |
| Mar 17, 2021 | Kirk Patrick Taylor became President and CFO |
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
3 ETFs hold RMCO
3 shown · $374.83K total exposure · 0.01% AUM-weighted avg weight
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.