UFP Industries, Inc. Common Stock(UFPI)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $77.89 – $118.00
- YTD
- -6.08%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 65.55
- Straddle Price
- $6.60
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.32
- Market Cap
- $4.7B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.43% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.02 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.06% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.75% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +41.7pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 8.4% |
| Book / Price | 63.7% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 16.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 4.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +3.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $86.32 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $82.30 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 12.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.5B |
| Market Cap | $5B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $52.00 | 21% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $6.37 | 17% | |
| Peer P/E | $80.55 | 6% | median 17.5× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $119.86 | 6% | median 12.4× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $127.97 | 6% | median 2.3× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $167.27 | 6% | median 1.5× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $86.32 | 37% | stability 89% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- SAWMILLS & PLANTING MILLS, GENERAL (2421)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $4.7B
UFP Industries Inc is a supplier of lumber to the manufactured housing industry. Today UFP Industries is a multibillion-dollar holding company with subsidiaries around the globe that serve three markets: retail, packaging and construction. Its business segments consist of UFP Retail Solutions, UFP Packaging, UFP Construction, All other and Corporate. It describes itself as an innovation company, a logistics company, a design company, an engineering and value-added product and solutions company.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.13% | 23 |
| Feb | +0.16% | 23 |
| Mar | +1.93% | 23 |
| Apr | +1.70% | 23 |
| May | -1.05% | 23 |
| Jun | -0.01% | 23 |
| Jul | +5.75% | 22 |
| Aug | -0.11% | 22 |
| Sep | -1.45% | 23 |
| Oct | +3.29% | 23 |
| Nov | +3.00% | 23 |
| Dec | +2.44% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | Pre-Market | 8.03% | 6.52% | 0.81x | Within |
| 2024-10-28 | After-Close | 7.68% | 6.48% | 0.84x | Within |
| 2025-02-18 | After-Close | 2.51% | 1.36% | 0.54x | Within |
| 2025-04-28 | After-Close | 7.70% | 5.97% | 0.78x | Within |
| 2025-07-28 | After-Close | 7.45% | 1.94% | 0.26x | Within |
| 2025-10-29 | Pre-Market | 7.47% | 2.11% | 0.28x | Within |
| 2026-02-23 | After-Close | 8.08% | 2.12% | 0.26x | Within |
| 2026-04-29 | After-Close | 6.40% | 3.71% | 0.58x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 65.55
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 70.4%
- Straddle (30D)
- $6.60
- Straddle (7D)
- $4.88
- P/C Volume
- 0.32
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.81
- Correlation (SPY)
- 33.7%
- R²
- 0.11
- Ann. Volatility
- 29.9%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.4%
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $11.53M | 78.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $1.60M | 10.90% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $856.72K | 5.82% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $681.69K | 4.63% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $36.85K | 0.25% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $332.06K | 100.00% | 2025-09-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 | MICHAEL R COLE | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +18 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Robert Paul Guerre | Grant (A) | +18 RSU | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-06-03 | MATTHEW J MISSAD | Executive Chairman | Grant (A) | +18 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-03 | Landon C Tarvin | President,UFP Retail Solutions | Grant (A) | +18 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Joan A Budden | Director | Award (A) | +396 | $85.18 | $33.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | Benjamin J. McLean | Director | Grant (A) | +639 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Thomas Wayne Rhodes | Director | Grant (A) | +704 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Kuras Mary Tuuk | Director | Award (A) | +396 | $85.18 | $33.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | BRIAN C WALKER | Director | Grant (A) | +397 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-05 | Michael G. Wooldridge | Director | Award (A) | +396 | $85.18 | $33.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | Ronald K Jr. Grubbs | Director | Award (A) | +8 | $85.18 | $681 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-01 | MICHAEL R COLE | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +16 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-01 | Robert Paul Guerre | Grant (A) | +16 RSU | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-05-01 | MATTHEW J MISSAD | Executive Chairman | Grant (A) | +16 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-01 | Landon C Tarvin | President,UFP Retail Solutions | Grant (A) | +13 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MATTHEW J MISSAD | Executive Chairman | 321,583 | $27.84M | -$19.84M | 274 | 2026-06-03 |
| 2 | PETER F SECCHIA | Director | 300,611 | $26.03M | -$6.18M | 11 | 2009-02-03 |
| 3 | PATRICK M WEBSTER | President and COO | 294,298 | $25.48M | -$11.80M | 223 | 2022-12-30 |
| 4 | MICHAEL R COLE | Chief Financial Officer | 206,244 | $17.86M | -$3.75M | 252 | 2026-06-03 |
| 5 | ALLEN T PETERS | Pres & COO, UFP Retail, LLC | 186,797 | $16.17M | -$4.51M | 71 | 2022-08-02 |
| 6 | ROBERT W LEES | President, UFP Eastern Div | 142,788 | $12.36M | -$1.39M | 39 | 2014-03-03 |
| 7 | Scott A Worthington | President, UFP Packaging | 133,274 | $11.54M | $0 | 86 | 2026-03-02 |
| 8 | GARY F GOODE | Director | 131,876 | $11.42M | $0 | 57 | 2018-05-10 |
| 9 | MICHAEL B GLENN | Chief Executive Officer | 91,952 | $7.96M | -$1.50M | 34 | 2011-08-30 |
| 10 | Patrick M. Benton | President, UFP Construction | 89,436 | $7.74M | -$8.00M | 95 | 2026-04-02 |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | 0000912767-26-000035 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-04 | 0000912767-26-000028 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-30 | 0000912767-26-000026 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-29 | 0000912767-26-000023 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-28 | 0000912767-26-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-23 | 0000912767-26-000017 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-22 | 0000912767-26-000015 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-06 | 0000912767-26-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-24 | 0000912767-26-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-23 | 0000912767-26-000008 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | 0001104659-26-056076 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-05 | 0001104659-25-106860 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-06 | 0001558370-25-010442 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-07 | 0001558370-25-006667 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-06 | 0001558370-24-014587 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-07 | 0001558370-24-011288 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-08 | 0001558370-24-007280 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-08 | 0001558370-23-018304 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-09 | 0001558370-23-014136 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-10 | 0001558370-23-009010 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 18.8 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.5 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.8 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $6.2B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.3B |
| TTM EPS | $4.6 |
| ROE | 8.4% |
| Dividend Yield | 1.72% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.08 |