URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
ETF 43.73 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $41.36 – $84.95
- YTD
- -27.66%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 27.86
- Straddle Price
- $4.47
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.30
- Open
- $43.67
- Day Range
- $43.27 – $44.06
- Volume
- 457,202
- Prev Close
- $43.19
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2019-12-03
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- —
- Trailing yield
- 4.04% paid annual
- Average daily volume
- $32M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- —
- Listed
- Dec 3, 2019 NYSE Arca
Moves with. Gold (21% of its variance, beta 0.68); Value over growth (12% of its variance, beta -0.90); Small caps over large (7% of its variance, beta 1.03); US large-cap stocks (4% of its variance, beta 0.34). These factors explain 55% of its daily moves over the last year.
No monthly flow reports are on file for this fund yet. New funds appear after their first quarterly filing; funds organised as unit investment trusts do not file them.
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URAGlobal X Uranium ETF | — | 0.69% | $4.9B | −34.0% | compare |
| NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | — | 0.52% | $3.1B | −38.5% | compare |
| NUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF | — | 0.85% | $890M | −17.9% | compare |
| RCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | — | 0.70% | $30M | −12.1% | compare |
| URANThemes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | — | 0.35% | $28M | −34.3% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Nuclear & Uranium category.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-18 | 2025-12-22 | $1.7432 | CD |
| 2024-12-12 | 2024-12-19 | $1.2800 | CD |
| 2023-12-14 | 2023-12-21 | $1.7510 | CD |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -5.12% | -16.40% | 15.97% | 14.55% | -6.02% | 23.01% | 4.33% |
| Feb | 20.09% | 14.62% | -11.15% | -17.58% | -12.97% | 0.33% | -1.11% |
| Mar | 1.28% | 9.12% | -8.17% | 0.31% | -0.67% | -16.42% | -2.43% |
| Apr | 0.12% | -10.92% | -0.96% | -4.55% | 6.67% | 7.33% | -0.38% |
| May | 5.88% | -5.21% | 0.66% | 9.01% | 14.62% | -8.71% | 2.71% |
| Jun | -9.25% | -13.67% | 2.38% | -11.05% | 21.43% | -13.98% | -4.02% |
| Jul | -6.15% | 18.76% | 4.17% | -5.50% | -3.40% | -7.81% | 0.01% |
| Aug | 6.41% | 14.69% | 10.85% | -2.88% | 14.80% | 12.01% | 9.31% |
| Sep | 18.30% | -11.52% | 20.64% | 17.58% | 17.57% | -13.19% | 8.23% |
| Oct | 11.17% | -0.40% | 1.58% | 0.45% | 7.91% | -7.43%* | 2.21% |
| Nov | -8.64% | 2.15% | 5.17% | 3.69% | -8.54% | -- | -1.23% |
| Dec | -9.20% | -3.89% | -1.89% | -14.69% | 0.24% | -- | -5.89% |
| Total | 20.95% | -10.18% | 41.01% | -15.95% | 55.58% | -27.86% | 10.59% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) - Comprehensive Analysis
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH | Confidence Level: 7/10
Investment Thesis: URNM is caught in a sharp technical pullback despite a fundamentally bullish long-term narrative around nuclear energy and uranium demand. While recent headlines (through September 2026) remain positive and frame this as a "generational buying opportunity," the fund is trading 27.5% below its 200-day moving average with accelerating downside momentum (RSI 33.22, -DI 41.08). The options market is pricing substantial downside risk ($4.55 expected move), and put/call ratios suggest institutional concern. This creates a classic setup where positive sentiment contradicts deteriorating technicals—a high-risk environment requiring disciplined entry points.
Key Drivers:
- Bullish: Long-term thesis intact (nuclear energy AI demand, Trump administration support per Jan-Feb headlines)
- Bearish: Technical breakdown, fund down 27.5% YTD relative to 200-MA, extreme put/call positioning
Primary Risks:
- Continued fund outflows if technical support breaks ($42.58)
- High beta (2.28) amplifies market drawdowns
- Low IV Rank (8.8%) suggests volatility likely to expand on further moves
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Strength | Commentary | |-----------|-----------|----------|------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | BEARISH | Strong | Price $43.45 below all major moving averages; SMA20 $47.83, SMA50 $52.38 form descending cascade | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BEARISH | Strong | Price down 27.5% from 200-MA ($59.98); EMA 12 ($46.06) below EMA 26 ($48.41) confirms downtrend | | Long-term (3-12 months) | NEUTRAL-BULLISH | Conflicted | Despite pullback, headline sentiment (9/21 Motley Fool, 4/2 "buying opportunity") suggests institutional interest in accumulation |
Support & Resistance Levels
Critical Support:
- $42.58 (Bollinger Band lower) — First major support; volume pattern suggests institutions could step in here
- $40.00-$41.00 (psychological, ~8% below current) — Next institutional support zone
- $35.00-$37.00 (200-MA decay level, ~15% below current) — Capitulation zone if fund breaks decisively lower
Resistance:
- $47.83 (SMA 20, Bollinger Middle) — Immediate overhead; must reclaim to confirm trend reversal
- $52.38 (SMA 50) — Significant resistance; recapture would signal medium-term recovery
- $59.98 (SMA 200) — Recovery target if reversal confirmed; 38% upside from current
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 33.22 — Neutral-to-Oversold
- Not yet in oversold territory (<30), but approaching it; indicates selling pressure remains, not yet extreme panic
- Room for further compression before classic bounce setup forms
- Signal: Deteriorating momentum, but not yet capitulation
MACD: -2.35 / Signal: -0.37 / Histogram: -1.98 — BEARISH
- Histogram deeply negative (-1.98) and widening, indicating accelerating downward momentum
- MACD well below zero; signal line positive but MACD negative = bearish crossover structure
- Signal: Momentum deteriorating; no reversal signals present
Stochastic %K: 9.51 / %D: 6.19 — EXTREME OVERSOLD
- Both indicators in deep oversold (<20), most extreme reading on chart
- Suggests violent selling exhaustion or capitulation; historically precedes bounces
- Signal: Technically, extreme oversold can mark reversal inflection, but timing uncertain
Williams %R: -78.82 — SEVERELY OVERSOLD
- Extreme reading (-78.82 is near -100 max); indicates sellers in control, price hitting lows
- Historically, readings <-80 can mark tactical reversal zones
- Signal: Contrarian indicator suggests potential bounce, but requires confirmation
Bollinger Bands: Position & Width
- Price ($43.45) near lower band ($42.58); neutral width (21.94) — not in squeeze
- Typical pattern: oversold position + neutral band width = either bounce or break below band
- Signal: Bounce potential, but no compression energy for explosive reversal
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary (Last 10 Articles; through Sept 21, 2026)
| Date | Source | Headline | Tone | Relevance | |------|--------|----------|------|-----------| | 9/21 | Motley Fool | "Underappreciated ETF Could Be Biggest Winner of Next 10 Years" | POSITIVE | Long-term bullish thesis endorsement; suggests current pullback as opportunity | | 4/17 | Benzinga | Sprott's New ETF Targets Rare Earths Outside China | NEUTRAL | Product innovation; broadens fund appeal but not direct uranium catalyst | | 4/2 | Investing.com | "Nuclear's Pullback: A Generational Buying Opportunity?" | POSITIVE | Direct framing of current drawdown as accumulation zone; aligns with technical support thesis | | 2/11 | Benzinga | "Uranium Quietly Recaptures Bullish Momentum" | POSITIVE | Dated momentum call; contradicted by current price action (down 27.5% since) | | 1/15 | Benzinga | Trump Holds Off On Critical Minerals Tariffs | NEUTRAL | Policy tailwind; removes downside risk but not immediate catalyst | | 1/6 | Benzinga | "Nuclear Stocks Rally As Trump Opens Federal Vault" | POSITIVE | Key positive catalyst; suggests policy support environment exists |
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE (Headlines) vs. BEARISH (Price Action)
Headline Sentiment Score: 67% Positive (4 of 6 recent headlines positive)
- Consistent theme: Long-term nuclear demand thesis intact, current pullback framed as opportunity
- Most recent headline (9/21) reinforces "underappreciated" narrative despite 27.5% decline
- Absence of negative headlines (no earnings misses, regulatory setbacks, management changes)
Critical Disconnect: Recent positive headlines (especially 9/21 and 4/2) do NOT align with technical deterioration. This suggests:
- Retail/sentiment remains bullish (supporting long thesis)
- Institutions may be quietly exiting (put/call ratios, OI skew toward puts)
- Timing risk: Consensus "buying opportunity" may trigger more capitulation before reversal
Catalyst Identification
Immediate (1-7 days):
- Technical support test at $42.58; break below would likely accelerate selling
- Options expiration (36 DTE) at expected $4.55 move suggests further volatility ahead
Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Potential bounce if RSI <30 and reversal pattern forms
- No earnings catalysts (ETF); instead monitor uranium spot prices and utility policy announcements
Medium-term (1-3 months):
- U.S. nuclear energy policy developments (Trump administration support per headlines)
- Uranium supply/demand updates from major miners held within fund
- Fund flow reversal if technical support holds and sentiment turns to accumulation
Long-term (3-12 months):
- AI data center electricity demand driving nuclear utility contracts
- Geopolitical uranium supply risks (Russia sanctions, Kazakhstan supply)
Market Narrative Assessment
Headline Narrative: "Nuclear energy is poised to dominate the next decade as AI explodes. Current pullback is a buying opportunity for long-term investors."
Technical Narrative: "Fund in sharp downtrend, 27.5% below fair-value moving average, with accelerating downside momentum and institutional put positioning. Oversold extremes suggest bounce potential, but no reversal confirmed."
Resolution: The narratives will reconcile when either (A) technicals stabilize and confirm accumulation, or (B) headlines shift negative if uranium demand thesis falters. **Current environment = high risk for long position holders, tactical opportunity for disciplined buyers
URNM Options Activity & IV Rank
URNM IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 30th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
URNM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $118.46M | 49.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $84.35M | 35.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Walleye Trading LLC | $15.75M | 6.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $13.14M | 5.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $5.94M | 2.50% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $294.50K | 0.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $18.87M | 48.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $9.10M | 23.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $5.32M | 13.69% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $4.99M | 12.82% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $536.42K | 1.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $63.11K | 0.16% | 2026-06-30 |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|