RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
XNYS
351.53
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $231.17 – $352.19
- YTD
- +29.13%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 59.24
- Straddle Price
- $21.70
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.54
- Market Cap
- $14.6B
- Open
- $346.94
- Day Range
- $346.16 – $352.19
- Volume
- 321,794
- Prev Close
- $351.06
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.19% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.49 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 7.63% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 7.47% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +13.9pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $3.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 21.6% |
| Book / Price | 115.9% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Bank Quality Adj | ×1.07 (target ROE vs peer median) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 45.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 25.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.13 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $327.40 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $330.06 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 3.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.8B |
| Market Cap | $16B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $558.06 | 22% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $644.69 | 7% | median 10.1× · 6 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 7.8× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/B | $809.84 | 10% | median 2.0× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $405.22 | 3% | median 1.5× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $327.40 | 44% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $351.76 | 14% | 13 strikes · skew -0.51 |
- Industry (SIC)
- FIRE, MARINE & CASUALTY INSURANCE (6331) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $14.6B
- Employees
- 1,040
- List Date
- 1995-07-27
- CIK
- 0000913144
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-27 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $9.28 (5 est.)
- Headquarters
- Pembroke, D0
- Homepage
- https://www.renre.com
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd provides reinsurance and insurance solutions and related services. The company's core products include property, casualty and specialty reinsurance. Revenue is derived from three sources: net premiums earned from the insurance and insurance products sold; net investment income from the investment of capital funds and cash; and other income from the company's joint ventures, advisory services, and other items. The reportable segments of the company are the Property segment which includes catastrophe and other property reinsurance, and the Casualty and Specialty segmen…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -7.00% | -6.17% | 5.31% | 14.33% | -6.53% | 3.47% | 0.57% |
| Feb | 9.17% | -4.55% | 2.56% | 0.73% | 2.32% | 6.31% | 2.76% |
| Mar | -1.45% | 8.95% | -7.76% | 5.23% | -0.53% | -3.19% | 0.21% |
| Apr | 2.31% | -11.35% | 6.58% | -6.69% | -1.25% | 3.83% | -1.09% |
| May | -7.78% | 6.28% | -12.57% | 4.37% | 5.15% | -6.33% | -1.81% |
| Jun | -2.42% | 4.19% | -1.01% | -0.56% | -4.35% | 14.11% | 1.66% |
| Jul | 0.69% | -17.67% | 1.08% | 4.86% | -0.14% | 0.23% | -1.83% |
| Aug | 3.05% | 7.31% | 0.17% | 9.89% | 0.48% | 1.95% | 3.81% |
| Sep | -10.43% | 2.83% | 4.37% | 6.02% | 3.88% | -3.51% | 0.53% |
| Oct | 1.61% | 12.73% | 11.15% | -4.34% | -0.92% | 8.84%* | 4.84% |
| Nov | 4.24% | 22.44% | -5.56% | 8.36% | 2.02% | -- | 6.30% |
| Dec | 8.91% | 0.77% | -8.10% | -13.45% | 6.52% | -- | -1.07% |
| Total | -1.24% | 21.04% | -6.32% | 28.63% | 6.04% | 26.83% | 12.50% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
COMPREHENSIVE STOCK ANALYSIS REPORT
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL | Confidence Level: 6/10
RNR presents a conflicted technical and market setup with mixed signals that warrant cautious observation rather than committed positioning. The stock is trading near short-term moving averages in a range-bound regime with neutral momentum, while its distinctive negative beta (-0.42) creates defensive characteristics that may be advantageous in market downturns but limit upside participation.
Key Drivers:
- Defensive positioning (inverse market correlation) provides portfolio hedge value
- Technical consolidation near 20/50-day moving averages suggests indecision
- Options market pricing moderate expected moves ($24.15 over 46 DTE, ~7.5% range)
- Positive IV premium (45% above realized volatility) suggests elevated option prices
Primary Risks:
- Weak trend conviction (ADX 11.13 = range-bound environment)
- Bearish momentum divergence (-DI 21.99 > +DI 16.06)
- Limited near-term news catalysts visible in headline queue
- Negative correlation to broader market limits traditional upside participation
Investment Thesis: RNR functions as a non-correlated defensive asset with potential value as a portfolio diversifier given its negative beta. However, the lack of strong technical directional conviction combined with a range-bound ADX regime suggests waiting for clearer catalysts before establishing positions. Current pricing reflects uncertainty rather than opportunity.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Trend Direction Assessment
SHORT-TERM (1-4 weeks): RANGE-BOUND
- Current Price: $323.39
- Position Relative to MAs: Trading below SMA 20 ($325.87) and SMA 50 ($325.39) but above SMA 200 ($304.18)
- Interpretation: Stock is in a micro-downtrend intra-week but within a longer-term uptrend structure. The proximity to both 20/50-day MAs ($325-326 zone) indicates equilibrium.
MEDIUM-TERM (1-3 months): CONSOLIDATION
- ADX (14): 11.13 = Weak trend regime (ADX <20 indicates range/consolidation)
- Directional Index Analysis:
- +DI: 16.06 (bullish pressure)
- -DI: 21.99 (bearish pressure)
- Signal: Bearish directional bias despite positive long-term MA alignment
- Distance from 200-day MA: +6.3% above ($304.18), confirming uptrend structure but without momentum
LONG-TERM (3-12 months): UPTREND (WEAKENING)
- Stock has appreciated from $304.18 (200-day MA) to $323.39 (+6.3%)
- However, failing to break above resistance at $325-326 zone suggests momentum exhaustion
- Consolidation pattern may precede either a continuation move or pullback toward $320 support
Support & Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Significance | Distance from Current | |-------|------|--------------|----------------------| | $331.74 | Resistance | Bollinger Upper Band | +2.6% | | $325.87 | Resistance | SMA 20 / Bollinger Middle | +0.8% | | $325.39 | Support | SMA 50 | +0.6% | | $320.00 | Support | Bollinger Lower Band | -1.1% | | $304.18 | Major Support | SMA 200 | -6.0% |
Critical Observation: The $325-326 zone (intersection of SMA 20 and SMA 50) is acting as both dynamic resistance (price below it) and consolidation fulcrum. A decisive break above $331.74 would target upside, while a break below $320 would confirm pullback into the $304-315 zone.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 47.06 | Assessment: NEUTRAL
- Reading is perfectly centered in the 30-70 neutral zone
- No overbought condition (would need RSI >70)
- No oversold condition (would need RSI <30)
- Indicates balanced buying and selling pressure with no urgency
- Implication: Low probability of imminent mean reversion moves
MACD Analysis: BULLISH DIVERGENCE
- MACD Line: -0.61
- Signal Line: -0.67
- Histogram: +0.06 (positive, indicating MACD > Signal)
- Interpretation: MACD recently crossed above signal line = incipient bullish momentum
- Caveat: Both MACD and signal remain negative, indicating this is momentum turning from negative to less negative, not strong bullish confirmation
- Timeline: Early-stage bullish setup; typically precedes price strength by 1-2 weeks
Stochastic Oscillators:
- %K: 41.89 / %D: 31.09
- Moderate values suggest stock is not stretched in either direction
- %K > %D indicates slight bullish momentum, but neither is in extreme territory
Williams %R: -61.41
- Mid-range reading confirming neutral momentum (would need <-80 for oversold, >-20 for overbought)
Bollinger Bands Analysis
Configuration: NEUTRAL SQUEEZE
- Upper Band: $331.74 (resistance)
- Middle Band: $325.87 (dynamic support/resistance)
- Lower Band: $320.00 (support)
- Band Width: $11.74 (relatively tight)
- Current Position: Trading near middle band, slightly below
- Signal: Band width of 3.60% suggests moderate volatility compression; narrower squeezes sometimes precede breakouts
Risk Consideration: Stock is positioned to potentially expand in either direction once trend clarifies, but current positioning (near middle) offers no edge.
Volume Analysis
Volume Metrics:
- 20-day SMA: 323,699 shares
- Volume Rate of Change: +29.06% (volume accelerating above average)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 7,510,913 (trending direction indicator)
Interpretation:
- Positive Signal: Volume acceleration of +29% above 20-day average indicates increased institutional or retail participation
- Bullish Implication: Higher volume on potential moves upward would be more conviction-bearing than selling volume
- Caution: Volume surge without clear directional commitment may simply reflect market awareness of the $325-326 resistance zone
Institutional Interest Assessment: MODERATE
- The volume spike (+29%) suggests renewed interest but lacks directional commitment
- Typical institutional accumulation would show volume clustering on down days (buying dips) or up days (breakouts)
- Current data suggests neither—volume is elevated but directionless
NEWS & SENTIMENT ANALYSIS
Recent Headlines Summary (10 Most Recent Articles)
| # | Headline | Source | Date | Sentiment | Relevance | |---|----------|--------|------|-----------|-----------| | 1 | FAF Stock Outperforms Industry | Zacks | 2026-09-15 | NEUTRAL | Data Quality Issue: Article references "FAF" not RNR; likely unrelated or data mislabeling | | 2 | Why Is Mercury General (MCY) Down 6.1%? | Zacks | 2026-09-03 | NEUTRAL | Data Quality Issue: References MCY, not RNR; incorrect dataset | | 3 | A Quiet Outperformer With Catastrophe Caveat | Investing.com | 2026-04-14 | NEUTRAL | Relevant but vague: Suggests RNR is outperforming but faces catastrophe risk (insurance-related) | | 4 | VedTechBio Launches RxAgentAI™ & Drug Discovery Collaboration with RenaissThera® | GlobeNewswire | 2024-10-16 | POSITIVE | CRITICAL DATA ISSUE: Article dated 2024-10-16 (nearly 2 years old); references "RenaissThera®" not RenaissanceRe; likely incorrect matching | | 5 | Here's Why You Should Hold RNR Stock for Now | Zacks |
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-13 | After-Close | 1.93% | 1.46% | 0.76x | Within |
| 2021-04-14 | After-Close | 1.14% | 1.27% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
| 2021-07-22 | After-Close | 7.20% | 1.39% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2022-01-25 | After-Close | 5.44% | 3.38% | 0.62x | Within |
| 2023-05-02 | After-Close | 5.31% | 2.51% | 0.47x | Within |
| 2023-07-25 | After-Close | 6.82% | 0.50% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2023-11-01 | After-Close | 6.43% | 8.09% | 1.26x | Exceeded |
| 2024-01-30 | After-Close | 6.65% | 6.40% | 0.96x | Within |
| 2024-04-30 | After-Close | 5.63% | 0.42% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2024-07-24 | After-Close | 6.07% | 2.27% | 0.37x | Within |
| 2024-11-06 | After-Close | 4.95% | 4.35% | 0.88x | Within |
| 2025-01-28 | After-Close | 6.50% | 8.56% | 1.32x | Exceeded |
| 2025-04-23 | After-Close | 7.73% | 5.01% | 0.65x | Within |
| 2025-07-23 | After-Close | 6.74% | 0.74% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2025-10-28 | After-Close | 7.19% | 6.90% | 0.96x | Within |
| 2026-02-03 | After-Close | 5.33% | 5.04% | 0.95x | Within |
| 2026-04-28 | After-Close | 5.60% | 2.21% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2026-07-22 | After-Close | 6.88% | 0.71% | 0.10x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
RNR Options Activity & IV Rank
RNR IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 98th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $24.0M | #172 of 997 | -8.0% | 13F | |
| Markel Group Holding company Tom Gayner | $22.2M | #85 of 130 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $8.2M | #1729 of 3716 | -35.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $3.9M | #1082 of 4729 | +565.6% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $2.1M | #2849 of 6285 | -96.5% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
RNR Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $9.19M | 71.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $2.06M | 15.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.65M | 12.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $2.76M | 67.61% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $633.80K | 15.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $411.97K | 10.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $275.24K | 6.75% | 2025-09-30 |
RNR Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-03| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | Ross Curtis | EVP,Chief Portfolio Officer | Sell (S) | −9,623 | $337.60 | -$3.25M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-27 | Ross Curtis | EVP,Chief Portfolio Officer | Sell (S) | −377 | $335.00 | -$126.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Ross Curtis | EVP,Chief Portfolio Officer | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $330.00 | -$1.65M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | Ross Curtis | EVP,Chief Portfolio Officer | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $325.00 | -$1.62M | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Robert Qutub | EVP, Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −5,000 | $333.03 | -$1.67M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Carol P Sanders | Director | Sell (S) | −1,479 | $297.36 | -$439.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-12 | Stephen C Hooley | Director | Award (A) | +591 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-12 | Henry Klehm III | Director | Award (A) | +506 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | David C Bushnell | Director | — | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-12 | Robert Qutub | EVP, Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | −4,066 | $297.22 | -$917.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-12 | Ross Curtis | EVP,Chief Portfolio Officer | Disp (D) | −1,070 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-12 | Kevin ODonnell | Pres & Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −10,071 | $297.22 | -$2.27M | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-12 | David E Marra | EVP,Chief Underwriting Officer | Mixed | −3,282 | $297.22 | -$781.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-12 | Shannon Lowry Bender | EVP, General Counsel & Secty | Mixed | −2,008 | $297.22 | -$453.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | James Christopher Fraser | SVP, Chief Accounting Officer | Award (A) | +1,611 | — | EDGAR |
RNR Insider Holdings
19 insiders · @ $351.53| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kevin ODonnell | Pres & Chief Executive Officer | 445,549 | $156.62M | -$41.25M | 113 | 2026-03-12 |
| 2 | Ross Curtis | EVP,Chief Portfolio Officer | 160,991 | $56.59M | -$29.68M | 63 | 2026-09-03 |
| 3 | David E Marra | EVP,Chief Underwriting Officer | 95,465 | $33.56M | -$2.68M | 24 | 2026-03-12 |
| 4 | Robert Qutub | EVP, Chief Financial Officer | 72,907 | $25.63M | -$5.46M | 29 | 2026-07-28 |
| 5 | Sean G Brosnan | SVP, Chief Investment Officer | 40,565 | $14.26M | -$1.08M | 19 | 2026-03-03 |
| 6 | Shannon Lowry Bender | EVP, General Counsel & Secty | 36,122 | $12.70M | $0 | 8 | 2026-03-12 |
| 7 | James L Gibbons | Director | 32,462 | $11.41M | $0 | 19 | 2026-03-03 |
| 8 | Brian Gerald John Gray | Director | 25,118 | $8.83M | $979.6K | 14 | 2024-11-07 |
| 9 | Henry Klehm III | Director | 20,824 | $7.32M | -$752.0K | 25 | 2026-05-12 |
| 10 | James Christopher Fraser | SVP, Chief Accounting Officer | 15,097 | $5.31M | -$3.29M | 15 | 2026-03-03 |
RNR Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-03What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | Ross Curtis | Officer | 9,623 | $3.25M | 2026-09-03 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-26 | Ross Curtis | Officer | 377 | $126.3K | 2026-08-26 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-24 | Ross Curtis | Officer | 5,000 | $1.65M | 2026-08-24 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-17 | Ross Curtis | Officer | 5,000 | $1.62M | 2026-08-17 | Merrill Lynch | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-28 | Qutub Robert | Officer | 5,000 | $1.67M | 2026-07-28 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-25 | DAVID COLTON BUSHNELL LIVING TRUST | Former Affiliate | 5,000 | $1.54M | 2026-06-25 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-24 | DAVID COLTON BUSHNELL LIVING TRUST | Former Affiliate | 5,000 | $1.56M | 2026-06-24 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-03 | DAVID COLTON BUSHNELL LIVING TRUST | Director | 1,287 | $360.2K | 2026-06-03 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-18 | Sanders Carol P | Officer | 1,479 | $439.8K | 2026-05-18 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-06 | Qutub Robert | Officer | 5,000 | $1.53M | 2026-02-06 | Merrill Lynch | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 0001140361-26-021333 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | 0000913144-26-000070 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-28 | 0000913144-26-000063 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-03 | 0000913144-26-000003 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-22 | 0000913144-25-000099 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-28 | 0000913144-25-000090 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-23 | 0000913144-25-000079 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-03 | 0000913144-25-000073 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-08 | 0000913144-25-000070 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-23 | 0000913144-25-000060 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-11 | 0000913144-26-000012 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-12 | 0000913144-25-000009 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-21 | 0000913144-24-000019 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-08 | 0000913144-23-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-04 | 0000913144-22-000015 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-05 | 0000913144-21-000029 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-07 | 0000913144-20-000024 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-07 | 0000913144-19-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2018-02-09 | 0001628280-18-001312 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-23 | 0000913144-17-000002 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | 0000913144-26-000065 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-29 | 0000913144-25-000094 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-24 | 0000913144-25-000082 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-24 | 0000913144-25-000065 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-07 | 0000913144-24-000125 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-25 | 0000913144-24-000098 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-01 | 0000913144-24-000083 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-02 | 0000913144-23-000114 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-26 | 0000913144-23-000103 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-03 | 0000913144-23-000073 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.42% | $512.4M | $121.3B | 2026-10-15 |
| 2 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $417.3M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.17% | $297.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 4 | VBR Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | Vanguard | 0.30% | $193.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | DFAT Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF | Dimensional | 0.55% | $168.6M | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 6 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.16% | $148.7M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | Invesco | 2.17% | $118.6M | — | 2026-10-17 |
| 8 | MDY State Street® SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400® ETF Trust | SPDR (State Street) | 0.42% | $107.0M | $25.8B | 2026-10-15 |
| 9 | CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF | Capitalgroup | 2.38% | $84.3M | $3.5B | 2026-10-15 |
| 10 | SPMD State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.42% | $76.9M | $18.4B | 2026-10-15 |
| 11 | VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | Vanguard | 0.06% | $74.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.28% | $62.3M | $22.1B | 2026-10-15 |
| 13 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.10% | $58.6M | $56.3B | 2026-10-15 |
| 14 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 0.06% | $52.6M | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 15 | SDY State Street® SPDR® S&P® Dividend ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 0.24% | $51.8M | $21.4B | 2026-10-15 |
| 16 | IJK iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.43% | $44.7M | $10.4B | 2026-10-15 |
| 17 | IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.41% | $35.0M | $8.5B | 2026-10-15 |
| 18 | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $32.0M | $83.7B | 2026-10-15 |
| 19 | REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | ProShares | 1.76% | $29.8M | — | 2026-10-16 |
| 20 | DCOR Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | Dimensional | 0.05% | $22.7M | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 21 | VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | Vanguard | 0.16% | $22.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 22 | IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | Vanguard | 0.39% | $22.1M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 23 | IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.14% | $21.3M | $15.4B | 2026-10-15 |
| 24 | DFAS Dimensional US Small Cap ETF | Dimensional | 0.06% | $18.7M | — | 2026-10-15 |
| 25 | FXO First Trust Financials AlphaDEX® Fund | First Trust | 1.77% | $18.5M | $1.0B | 2026-10-16 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $2.19B | $279.96M | $6.57 | $687.57M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $2.97B | $739.12M | $16.57 | $482.98M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $3.20B | $892.65M | $19.40 | $1.58B |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $3.19B | $813.16M | $17.20 | $1.47B |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $3.47B | $158.78M | $3.27 | $157.77M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $2.29B | $-195.93M | $-3.63 | $778.92M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $3.97B | $1.16B | $22.62 | $1.49B |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $2.82B | $487.72M | $9.41 | $1.21B |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $2.60B | $359.52M | $6.94 | $683.46M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $3.24B | $1.55B | $32.14 | $512.50M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $1.84B | $191.35M | $3.80 | $772.47M |
| Q2 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $1.85B | $188.14M | $4.09 | $190.97M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.