Vuzix Corporation(VUZI)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $1.97 – $5.62
- YTD
- -23.64%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 65.2
- Straddle Price
- $0.55
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.08
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.67 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 14.12% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 13.98% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +198.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +7.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.07 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -145.9% |
| Book / Price | 11.2% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -19.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -403.6% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $2.59 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $2.61 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1028.9% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 27.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 20.7× · 7 peers |
| Peer P/B | $3.29 | 50% | median 10.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $0.91 | 50% | median 10.9× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $2.59 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $2.57 | 0% | 6 strikes · skew +0.49 |
- Industry (SIC)
- RADIO & TV BROADCASTING & COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT (3663)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.2B
Vuzix Corp is engaged in the design, manufacture, and marketing of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered Smart Glasses, Waveguides, and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies. Its solutions serve the enterprise, medical, defense, security, and select consumer markets, offering cutting-edge wearable computing and display technologies that enhance productivity and operational efficiency. Its products include near-eye displays (NEDs), heads-up displays (HUDs), and wearable computing devices and third-party original design manufacturer (ODM) and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) devices. Geographi…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -2.42% | 12 |
| Feb | -3.21% | 12 |
| Mar | -10.31% | 12 |
| Apr | +2.53% | 12 |
| May | +16.33% | 12 |
| Jun | +10.56% | 12 |
| Jul | -5.19% | 12 |
| Aug | -7.26% | 12 |
| Sep | +6.26% | 12 |
| Oct | -4.88% | 11 |
| Nov | +6.99% | 11 |
| Dec | +13.54% | 11 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical signals indicate a neutral trend, with the stock trading within a range
- Bullish catalysts from recent news headlines are somewhat offset by bearish market sentiment
- Options activity suggests a medium level of volatility, with options pricing in a potential move of $0.67
Primary Risks:
- High beta indicates high risk relative to the broader market (3.26 vs SPY)
- Volatility is currently high, which may lead to increased price swings
Investment Thesis:
Vuzix's stock has been trading within a range, with recent news headlines providing some bullish momentum. However, the options market suggests that volatility remains high, and the stock's beta indicates a higher risk profile than the broader market. As such, this analysis is neutral, suggesting a wait-and-see approach to see how the stock responds to upcoming catalysts.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The recent news headlines have been largely positive, with three out of six articles having a positive sentiment. However, one article had a negative sentiment, which may provide some bearish momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: Neutral (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: Uptrend (1-3 months)
- Long-term: Downtrend (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $2.72
- SMA 50: $2.57
- Upper Bollinger Band: $3.18
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: Neutral (38.88), not oversold or overbought
- MACD: Bearish, with the histogram below zero (-0.00)
- Stochastic %K/D: Not overbought or oversold
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 1036153.17
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 24878277.11
- Volume Rate of Change: -67.87%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The recent news headlines have been largely positive, with a focus on product launches and partnerships.
Sentiment Assessment:
Aggregate sentiment is POSITIVE, with three out of six articles having a positive sentiment.
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming catalysts include earnings reports from Vuzix's competitors.
- Product launches and partnerships may also provide some bullish momentum.
Market Narrative:
The news headlines align somewhat with the technical signals, which suggest a neutral trend. The market narrative is somewhat mixed, with some articles highlighting the company's strengths while others focus on potential risks.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment:
The stock has a high beta (3.26) and high volatility (0.98), indicating a higher risk profile than the broader market.
Volatility Regime:
Current volatility is high relative to historical levels, which may lead to increased price swings.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 40.9% (Medium)
- Current IV: 207.9%
- Expected Move: $0.67 (42 DTE)
Downside Protection:
The stock's support level at SMA 20 ($2.72) may provide some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
Vuzix is outperforming the broader market, with a relative strength of +10%.
Institutional Activity:
Institutional interest is increasing, with a volume flow of 373 calls vs 141 puts and an open interest of 6,588 calls vs 673 puts.
Correlation Analysis:
The stock has a moderate correlation (0.43) with the broader market.
Relative Valuation:
The stock is trading within its historical range, with some upside potential if earnings reports are positive.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $2.72
- Upper Bollinger Band: $3.18
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout above upper Bollinger Band: Bullish signal
- Breakdown below SMA 20: Bearish signal
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Earnings reports from Vuzix's competitors (upcoming)
- Product launches and partnerships (short-term)
Risk Management:
Stop-loss levels should be set around the SMA 20 level ($2.72) to manage risk.
By analyzing the technical, news, and sentiment data, this report provides a comprehensive view of Vuzix's stock performance and potential risks. The neutral trend suggests a wait-and-see approach, while the high beta and volatility indicate a higher risk profile than the broader market. Options activity suggests some upside potential, but also highlights the need for caution.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | After-Close | 27.03% | 6.31% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2025-03-17 | After-Close | 19.87% | 2.09% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2025-05-14 | Pre-Market | 217.16% | 3.15% | 0.01x | Within |
| 2025-08-15 | Pre-Market | 27.27% | 8.18% | 0.30x | Within |
| 2025-11-14 | After-Close | 16.59% | 2.21% | 0.13x | Within |
| 2026-03-13 | Pre-Market | 26.42% | 9.59% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2026-05-14 | After-Close | 13.01% | 2.44% | 0.19x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 65.2
- IV Rank (7D)
- 65.2
- Avg IV
- 264.5%
- Straddle (30D)
- $0.55
- Straddle (7D)
- $0.55
- P/C Volume
- 0.08
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 3.19
- Correlation (SPY)
- 44.7%
- R²
- 0.20
- Ann. Volatility
- 92.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $952.65K | 45.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $627.27K | 29.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $320.51K | 15.18% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | Leonteq Securities AG | $203.00K | 9.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Walleye Capital LLC | $7.83K | 0.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $1.09M | 62.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $298.41K | 17.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $185.31K | 10.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Walleye Capital LLC | $137.75K | 7.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $33.46K | 1.92% | 2025-09-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-20 | Timothy Heydenreich Harned | Director | Award (A) | +29,412 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-17 | Paula Beck Whitten-Doolin | Director | Award (A) | +29,412 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-17 | Alasdair John MacKinnon | Director | Award (A) | +29,412 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-27 | Paula Beck Whitten-Doolin | Director | Sell (S) | −32,000 | $4.68 | -$149.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | Timothy Heydenreich Harned | Director | Sell (S) | −10,000 | $4.73 | -$47.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-24 | Christopher Iain Parkinson | Disp (D) | −1,000,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2026-03-04 | Christopher Iain Parkinson | See remarks | Sell (S) | −11,663 | $2.69 | -$31.4K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-23 | Christopher Iain Parkinson | See Remarks | Sell (S) | −9,457 | $2.92 | -$27.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-30 | Christopher Iain Parkinson | See Remarks | Award (A) | +150,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-25 | Alasdair John MacKinnon | Director | Award (A) | +65,295 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-09-23 | Quanta Computer Inc. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +230,242 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-03 | Timothy Heydenreich Harned | Director | Award (A) | +31,746 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-03 | Paula Beck Whitten-Doolin | Director | Award (A) | +31,746 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-03 | Edward William Kay Jr. | Director | Award (A) | +31,746 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-17 | Quanta Computer Inc. | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +189,717 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTEL CORP | 10%+ Owner | 4,962,600 | $14.52M | -$57.10M | 1 | 2021-01-29 |
| 2 | Paul J Travers | President and CEO | 2,857,170 | $8.36M | $272.2K | 34 | 2025-01-08 |
| 3 | Grant Russell | CFO | 1,169,205 | $3.42M | $109.8K | 15 | 2025-01-08 |
| 4 | Timothy Heydenreich Harned | Director | 347,570 | $1.02M | $62.9K | 24 | 2026-07-20 |
| 5 | Edward William Kay Jr. | Director | 309,511 | $905.3K | $192.1K | 21 | 2025-07-03 |
| 6 | Paul A Boris | COO | 290,500 | $849.7K | $212.9K | 8 | 2018-05-08 |
| 7 | Peter Hamilton Jameson | Chief Operating Officer | 164,575 | $481.4K | $9.9K | 6 | 2025-02-06 |
| 8 | Christopher Iain Parkinson | See remarks | 131,130 | $383.6K | -$59.0K | 4 | 2026-04-24 |
| 9 | ALEXANDER RUCKDAESCHEL | Director | 130,147 | $380.7K | $0 | 9 | 2020-09-30 |
| 10 | Paula Beck Whitten-Doolin | Director | 120,080 | $351.2K | -$149.8K | 4 | 2026-07-17 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-21 | Harned Timothy Heydenreich | Officer | 10,000 | $47.3K | 2026-05-21 | Rockefeller Capital Management | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Whitten-Doolin Paula Beck | Director | 60,000 | $243.3K | 2026-05-19 | Charles Schwab Corporation | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 11.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 40.7 |
| EV/EBITDA | -8.0 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.0B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $-0.39 |
| ROE | -145.9% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% |