If Alphabet keeps doing what it has been doing, it could claim the title of the world's second-largest company.
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
340.84
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
GOOGL
$340.84
—
Key stats
$340.84
After hours
$338.86
-0.51%
- 52-Week Range
- $244.15 – $408.61
- YTD
- +8.15%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 83.87
- Straddle Price
- $29.15
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.48
- Market Cap
- $4270.9B
- Open
- $348.27
- Day Range
- $339.08 – $350.66
- Volume
- 28,683,650
- Prev Close
- $349.22
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.21% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.14 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.49% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.36% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +37.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 18.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +17.1% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $53.3B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 38.1% |
| Book / Price | 15.0% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 60.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 11.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.15 |
| Quality Score | 5/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $344.92 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $346.86 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $42.3B |
| Market Cap | $4276B |
Peers used for multiples: AAPL, AMD, AVGO, GOOG, META, MSFT, MU, NVDA
60-Day Conviction
77%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 16, 2026
$339.47
α -0.3%
rank 12%
conviction
20%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 15, 2026
$345.84
α +1.5%
rank 9%
conviction
49%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 13, 2027
$348.98
α +2.5%
rank 19%
conviction
77%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $117.14 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $627.90 | 9% | median 28.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $393.78 | 9% | median 25.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $596.80 | 2% | median 11.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $453.80 | 6% | median 11.3× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $344.92 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $350.19 | 19% | 86 strikes · skew +0.04 |
As of 2026-10-16 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. (7370) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $4270.9B
- Employees
- 198,933
- List Date
- 2004-08-19
- CIK
- 0001652044
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-28 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $2.94 (13 est.)
- Headquarters
- Mountain View, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.abc.xyz
Alphabet is a holding company that wholly owns internet giant Google. The California-based company derives slightly less than 90% of its revenue from Google services, the vast majority of which is advertising sales. Alongside online ads, Google services houses sales stemming from Google's subscription services (YouTube TV and YouTube Music, among others), platforms (sales and in-app purchases on Play Store), and devices (Chromebooks, Pixel smartphones, and smart home products such as Chromecast). Google's cloud computing platform accounts for roughly 10% of Alphabet's revenue. The firm's inves…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 5.86% | -6.68% | 10.91% | 1.40% | 7.70% | 7.25% | 4.41% |
| Feb | 6.81% | -1.88% | -10.33% | -1.91% | -15.38% | -9.29% | -5.33% |
| Mar | -0.34% | 3.73% | 14.80% | 10.06% | -7.41% | -6.19% | 2.44% |
| Apr | 10.50% | -18.58% | 2.86% | 4.69% | 1.10% | 29.39% | 4.99% |
| May | 0.59% | -2.42% | 14.62% | 5.27% | 6.47% | -1.39% | 3.86% |
| Jun | 2.55% | -4.33% | -3.25% | 5.19% | 4.26% | -5.05% | -0.10% |
| Jul | 10.03% | 6.97% | 10.69% | -6.26% | 9.13% | -1.18% | 4.90% |
| Aug | 7.30% | -5.78% | 3.51% | -4.32% | 12.57% | -9.15% | 0.69% |
| Sep | -7.95% | -12.84% | -3.54% | 5.40% | 15.02% | 2.70% | -0.20% |
| Oct | 8.42% | -4.19% | -7.52% | 2.47% | 14.82% | 0.69%* | 2.45% |
| Nov | -1.11% | 11.63% | 4.81% | -1.37% | 12.85% | -- | 5.36% |
| Dec | 2.69% | -12.63% | 5.94% | 10.39% | -0.60% | -- | 1.16% |
| Total | 53.69% | -40.74% | 47.80% | 33.84% | 72.34% | 2.65% | 28.26% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $346.41
SMA 50: $344.58
SMA 200: $340.90
Current: $340.59
EMA 12: $347.25
EMA 26: $346.25
MACD: 1.0014 | Signal: -0.1669
BULLISH
ADX (14): 16.72
RANGE
+DI: 20.57
−DI: 19.21
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 44.44
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 43.14
Stoch %D: 58.61
Williams %R: -78.74
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $356.44
BB Lower: $336.38
NEUTRAL
OBV: 848,222,457
Vol SMA 20: 25,168,643
Vol ROC: 13.69%
ATR: $8.91
True Range: $11.58
HV 20: 22.8%
HV 30: 23.6%
HV 60: 28.9%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-18T00:00:00 – 2026-10-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis
GOOGL Stock Analysis Report
Analysis Date: September 25, 2026 | Current Price: $345.46
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with Confidence Level: 6/10
Key Drivers:
- Mixed technical signals with bearish MACD histogram (-0.34) conflicting with price above all major moving averages
- High implied volatility (68.6% IV) pricing in significant expected moves ($23 by 28 DTE), suggesting market uncertainty
- Neutral momentum (RSI 50.83) indicates no directional conviction
Primary Risks:
- Volume rate of change at -90.31% signals sharply declining institutional participation and liquidity compression
- High beta (1.35) amplifies downside risk in market corrections
- IV premium 191.5% above realized volatility (HV30: 23.5%) suggests options are expensive; significant reversion risk if volatility contracts
Investment Thesis: GOOGL is stuck in a range-bound consolidation phase with deteriorating volume support despite positive sector tailwinds. The divergence between technical weakness (bearish MACD) and price stability above key moving averages creates an asymmetric risk profile favoring range-bound trading rather than directional conviction.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: NEUTRAL TO SLIGHTLY POSITIVE News headlines are predominantly sector-positive (AI automation, cloud adoption, digital transformation) but contain no GOOGL-specific catalysts. Broad market and technology sector narratives support Google's long-term thesis but provide no near-term price drivers.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Signal Strength | |-----------|-----------|-----------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | RANGE-BOUND | WEAK - ADX 13.39 confirms low trend strength | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | NEUTRAL/SLIGHTLY BULLISH | MODERATE - Price above SMA 50 ($344.32) & SMA 200 ($338.21) | | Long-term (3-12 months) | BULLISH STRUCTURE | MODERATE - Price above 200-day MA; no breakdown |
Support/Resistance Levels
Immediate Support:
- $342.25 (SMA 20) — Active support, currently 0.9% below price
- $338.21 (SMA 200) — Major structural support, 2.1% below price
- $329.71 (Bollinger Lower Band) — Panic support, 4.6% below price
Immediate Resistance:
- $354.79 (Bollinger Upper Band) — Overhead resistance, 2.7% above price
- $360.00 (psychological level) — Round number resistance
Critical Support Breakdown:
- Below $329.71 would break lower Bollinger Band and signal potential downtrend initiation
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 50.83 — NEUTRAL
- Reading is precisely at midpoint, indicating no overbought or oversold condition
- No imminent mean reversion pressure in either direction
- Suggests equilibrium between buyers and sellers with no momentum advantage
MACD: 0.21 / Signal: 0.55 / Histogram: -0.34 — BEARISH DIVERGENCE
- Critical Signal: MACD line (0.21) is trading BELOW signal line (0.55)
- Histogram at -0.34 indicates negative momentum acceleration
- This is a bearish crossover setup suggesting momentum is rolling over despite price stability
- Concern: This divergence often precedes 1-4 week downside pressure
Stochastic Oscillators: %K 38.83 / %D 47.39 — NEUTRAL TO WEAK BEARISH
- %K below %D indicates downward momentum pressure
- %K at 38.83 suggests mid-range positioning, not oversold
- Not yet signaling capitulation, but shows weakness
Williams %R: -51.35 — NEUTRAL
- Mid-range reading showing no extreme condition
- Consistent with consolidation phase
Bollinger Bands Analysis
Signal: NEUTRAL (Width: 7.33 = 2.13% of price)
- Status: Band width is relatively narrow, indicating low volatility on a technical basis
- Contradiction Alert: This contradicts high IV (68.6%) suggesting options market expects larger moves than recent price action shows
- Position: Price at $345.46 is between middle ($342.25) and upper band ($354.79), slightly closer to middle
- Interpretation: Potential for either direction breakout, but current positioning suggests neither extreme yet reached
- Squeeze Risk: Narrow bands combined with declining volume suggests potential for sharp breakout when volatility expands
Volume Analysis — CRITICAL WEAKNESS
Volume Rate of Change: -90.31% — SEVERE DETERIORATION
- This is an extreme red flag indicating massive drop in trading volume relative to historical averages
- Volume SMA 20: 25.9M shares suggests current daily volume is dramatically below this level
- Implication: Declining institutional participation; rally/decline lacks conviction due to thin liquidity
- Risk: Low volume environments are prone to sudden sharp moves with minimal buying/selling pressure needed to move price significantly
On-Balance Volume: 845.3M — NEUTRAL TREND
- Cumulative volume is positive but flat relative to recent price action
- No strong accumulation or distribution signal present
- Consistent with range-bound consolidation
Institutional Interest Signals:
- Reduced volume suggests institutional investors are either sidelined or reducing exposure
- Thin liquidity increases risk of slippage for large trades
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary (Last 10 Articles)
Sector-Level Themes Identified:
- AI Automation & Cloud Growth (Articles 5, 3, 6) — "AI Automation Market to reach $2,041.82B by 2035" at 31.62% CAGR; strong industry tailwinds
- Digital Transformation Acceleration (Article 3) — "Microservices in Healthcare" and broader cloud adoption
- Healthcare Tech Expansion (Articles 4, 6) — SMR (Small Modular Reactors) and AI-enabled biometric monitoring
- Market Consolidation (Articles 1, 2) — Berkshire Hathaway buying activity, SpaceX acquisition questions (tangential to GOOGL)
GOOGL-Specific Catalysts: NONE IDENTIFIED
- News is sector and market-level, not company-specific
- No earnings announcements, product launches, partnerships, or regulatory news
- No AI product updates despite being in core Google domain
- No cloud infrastructure announcements
Sentiment Assessment
Aggregate News Sentiment: POSITIVE (Sector-Level) / NEUTRAL (Company-Level)
- Positive Indicators: Broad technology sector growth narratives, AI market expansion, cloud adoption acceleration
- Neutral for GOOGL: News doesn't provide company-specific catalysts or differentiation
- Gap: Strong sector momentum but no news connecting GOOGL specifically to these opportunities
Catalyst Identification
Immediate (1-7 days): NONE IDENTIFIED Near-term (1-4 weeks):
- Potential earnings announcement (no date provided in data)
- Q3 cloud business performance disclosure
- AI product roadmap updates
Medium-term (1-3 months):
- AI automation market adoption curve acceleration
- Cloud infrastructure expansion needs
- Competitive pressure from AWS/Azure AI initiatives
Risk Catalysts:
- Regulatory scrutiny on AI deployment
- Antitrust concerns
- Competitive AI model releases from OpenAI/Anthropic partnerships
Market Narrative vs Technical Signals: DIVERGENCE
Bullish Narrative:
- "AI market expanding at 31.62% CAGR" → Google is major AI/ML player
- "Cloud adoption accelerating" → Google Cloud growth opportunity
- Sector sentiment is positive
Technical Reality:
- Bearish MACD divergence suggesting momentum rolling over
- Volume declining sharply (-90.31%) despite positive news
- Price stuck in range despite supportive sector backdrop
Interpretation: Market is aware of sector tailwinds but GOOGL specifically isn't attracting buying interest at this price level. Suggests investors may be waiting for better entry point or concerns about valuation/competition.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: 1.35 (High Risk Relative to Market)
What This Means:
- GOOGL is 35% more volatile
Generated
News
All GOOGL news →
A stock rout swept up companies from CoreWeave to Alphabet while Treasury yields tumbled.
Oracle's cloud backlog has swelled to $664 billion, and the stock has pulled back. Here's why long-term investors may want to take a closer look.
Alphabet's sales of AI chips could generate 35% of cloud revenue in 2027 in a boost for Google stock, says Evercore ISI. The post How AI Chips Will Power Google Cloud Revenue In 2027 And Beyond appeared first on Investor's Business Daily .
Preorders for the iPhone Duo began Friday, marking Apple’s debut in a foldable phone market largely dominated by Samsung and Google.
Character.AI collected millions of users, making it a very appealing acquisition. Google took a unique route to "acquiring" it, hiring away its founders and licensing its technology. Now Character.AI is filing for bankruptcy. Here's what to know.
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
Earnings History
12 of 23 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
5.86%
Avg Actual Move
5.23%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | After-Close | 4.61% | 7.28% | 1.58x | Exceeded |
| 2021-04-27 | After-Close | 4.00% | 2.97% | 0.74x | Within |
| 2021-07-27 | After-Close | 3.95% | 3.18% | 0.81x | Within |
| 2021-10-26 | After-Close | 3.86% | 4.96% | 1.28x | Exceeded |
| 2022-02-01 | After-Close | 4.98% | 7.52% | 1.51x | Exceeded |
| 2022-04-26 | After-Close | 7.69% | 3.67% | 0.48x | Within |
| 2022-07-26 | After-Close | 7.24% | 7.66% | 1.06x | Exceeded |
| 2022-10-25 | After-Close | 6.58% | 9.14% | 1.39x | Exceeded |
| 2023-02-02 | After-Close | 8.20% | 2.75% | 0.34x | Within |
| 2023-04-20 | After-Close | 1.20% | 0.11% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2023-07-25 | After-Close | 5.65% | 5.78% | 1.02x | Exceeded |
| 2023-10-24 | After-Close | 5.55% | 9.51% | 1.71x | Exceeded |
| 2024-01-30 | After-Close | 6.11% | 7.50% | 1.23x | Exceeded |
| 2024-04-25 | After-Close | 6.40% | 10.22% | 1.60x | Exceeded |
| 2024-07-23 | After-Close | 7.00% | 5.04% | 0.72x | Within |
| 2024-10-29 | After-Close | 7.25% | 2.82% | 0.39x | Within |
| 2025-02-04 | After-Close | 8.13% | 7.29% | 0.90x | Within |
| 2025-04-24 | After-Close | 7.44% | 1.68% | 0.23x | Within |
| 2025-07-23 | After-Close | 5.92% | 1.02% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2025-10-29 | After-Close | 8.22% | 2.52% | 0.31x | Within |
| 2026-02-04 | After-Close | 6.46% | 0.54% | 0.08x | Within |
| 2026-04-29 | After-Close | 5.46% | 9.96% | 1.82x | Exceeded |
| 2026-07-22 | After-Close | 2.92% | 7.13% | 2.44x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
GOOGL Options Activity & IV Rank
GOOGL IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 37.9%
7-DTE IV: 29.7%
Expected Move: $29.15
7-DTE Move: $11.60
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-11-13)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 2,645
Put Volume: 1,265
P/C Volume: 0.478
BULLISH
Call OI: 7,541
Put OI: 5,329
P/C OI: 0.707
Total OI: 12,870
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $15.57
ATM Put: $13.57
Call %: 4.6%
Put %: 4.0%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 564,418
Chain OI: 3,670,197
Last Updated: 10/16/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 27th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
27%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.10
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.58
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.63
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.58: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.63: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 532 ATM contracts, 932k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
73%
+5.2
pts
EXTREME
ATM 44.5% / Wing 49.7%
30 DTE / 10d
65%
+4.8
pts
EXTREME
ATM 38.7% / Wing 43.5%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)17.1LowOct 16
IV Rank (30 DTE)83.9HighOct 16
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$29.15Oct 16
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.3756
Alpha: 14.33%
Correlation: 0.5558
R-Squared: 30.9%
Stock Volatility: 31.5%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own GOOGL
19 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Holding company Warren Buffett, Greg Abel | $28.16B | #4 of 32 | +45.2% | 13F | |
| Tiger Global Hedge fund Chase Coleman | $2.07B | #4 of 46 | -45.4% | 13F | |
| Coatue Management Hedge fund Philippe Laffont | $1.74B | #10 of 66 | +12.6% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $1.52B | #4 of 4729 | -1.0% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $1.07B | #10 of 6285 | +5.3% | 13F | |
| Himalaya Capital Hedge fund Li Lu | $908.9M | #1 of 8 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $828.2M | #6 of 3138 | +327.2% | 13F | |
| Fundsmith Asset manager Terry Smith | $633.7M | #7 of 41 | -40.0% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $472.5M | #6 of 997 | -33.8% | 13F | |
| Third Point Activist Dan Loeb | $366.3M | #3 of 43 | +485.7% | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $213.1M | #4 of 251 | +3.9% | 13F | |
| Markel Group Holding company Tom Gayner | $204.4M | #16 of 130 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $132.0M | #127 of 1945 | -42.8% | 13F | |
| Duquesne Family Office Family office Stanley Druckenmiller | $120.2M | #8 of 86 | new | 13F | |
| Lone Pine Capital Hedge fund Stephen Mandel | $77.0M | #26 of 34 | +14.9% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $33.7M | #828 of 3716 | -94.3% | 13F | |
| ICONIQ Capital Family office | $14.1M | #16 of 76 | -94.9% | 13F | |
| Pershing Square Activist Bill Ackman | $9.3M | #17 of 17 | -95.2% | 13F | |
| Paulson & Co. Family office John Paulson | $1.8M | #8 of 8 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
GOOGL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 12,245,000,000 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
131 filers$48.25B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $10.63B | 22.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $9.05B | 18.75% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $7.20B | 14.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Value Aligned Research Advisors, LLC | $4.66B | 9.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Polar Capital Holdings Plc | $1.99B | 4.12% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $1.98B | 4.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.05B | 2.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.03B | 2.14% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $965.11M | 2.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $952.25M | 1.97% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $734.40M | 1.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $722.42M | 1.50% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $631.01M | 1.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Wells Fargo & Company Custodian | $578.19M | 1.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | HSBC Holdings plc Custodian | $568.46M | 1.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Tidal Investments LLC | $551.24M | 1.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Citigroup Inc. Custodian | $507.86M | 1.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Royal Bank of Canada Custodian | $499.89M | 1.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian | $412.26M | 0.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | PEAK6 LLC | $355.98M | 0.74% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | CREDIT AGRICOLE S A | $291.26M | 0.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $290.58M | 0.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $290.36M | 0.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Rokos Capital Management LLP | $214.34M | 0.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $184.22M | 0.38% | 2026-06-30 |
120 filers$36.70B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $6.30B | 17.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $6.03B | 16.43% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $4.51B | 12.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $2.17B | 5.90% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Citigroup Inc. Custodian | $1.72B | 4.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $1.61B | 4.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $1.56B | 4.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $1.21B | 3.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.20B | 3.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | HSBC Holdings plc Custodian | $911.93M | 2.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian | $809.59M | 2.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Clear Street Group Inc. | $718.49M | 1.96% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $609.60M | 1.66% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Hudson Bay Capital Management LP | $530.69M | 1.45% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $472.84M | 1.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $462.21M | 1.26% | 2025-09-30 |
| 17 | Daiwa Securities Group Inc. | $443.14M | 1.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $431.17M | 1.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Eisler Capital Management Ltd. | $407.14M | 1.11% | 2025-09-30 |
| 20 | Rokos Capital Management LLP | $364.38M | 0.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC | $270.56M | 0.74% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $263.95M | 0.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | CREDIT AGRICOLE S A | $260.88M | 0.71% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $248.84M | 0.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Wells Fargo & Company Custodian | $244.94M | 0.67% | 2026-06-30 |
GOOGL Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-01Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | Frances Arnold | Director | Sell (S) | −102 | $381.00 | -$38.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-01 | Kavitark Ram Shriram | Director | Gift (G) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-06-01 | Frances Arnold | Director | Sell (S) | −102 | $381.00 | -$38.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-01 | Kavitark Ram Shriram | Director | Gift (G) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-27 | Anat Ashkenazi | SVP, Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | −1,780 | $379.38 | -$675.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Ruth Porat | President and CIO | Mixed | −1,639 | $379.38 | -$621.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | John Kent Walker | President, Global Affairs, CLO | Mixed | −1,639 | $379.38 | -$621.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Sundar Pichai | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −3,700 | $379.38 | -$1.40M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Philipp Schindler | SVP, Chief Business Officer | Mixed | −2,013 | $379.38 | -$763.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Anat Ashkenazi | SVP, Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | −1,780 | $379.38 | -$675.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Ruth Porat | President and CIO | Mixed | −1,639 | $379.38 | -$621.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | John Kent Walker | President, Global Affairs, CLO | Mixed | −1,639 | $379.38 | -$621.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Sundar Pichai | Chief Executive Officer | Mixed | −3,700 | $379.38 | -$1.40M | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Philipp Schindler | SVP, Chief Business Officer | Mixed | −2,013 | $379.38 | -$763.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | Philipp Schindler | SVP, Chief Business Officer | Gift (G) | −429 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
GOOGL Insider Holdings
17 insiders · @ $340.59
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GV 2016 GP, L.L.C. | 10%+ Owner | 147,490,961 | $50.23B | $0 | 2 | 2025-05-19 |
| 2 | L John Doerr | Director | 15,893,600 | $5.41B | -$111.25M | 39 | 2026-03-18 |
| 3 | GV 2021 GP, L.L.C. | 10%+ Owner | 3,262,440 | $1.11B | $43.61M | 4 | 2025-08-05 |
| 4 | GV 2017 GP, L.L.C. | 10%+ Owner | 3,198,249 | $1.09B | -$35.06M | 2 | 2026-01-30 |
| 5 | Sundar Pichai | Chief Executive Officer | 783,292 | $266.78M | -$1.06B | 274 | 2026-05-27 |
| 6 | Brin Sergey | Director | 210,169 | $71.58M | -$3.23B | 143 | 2026-02-25 |
| 7 | Ruth Porat | President and CIO | 187,586 | $63.89M | -$19.69M | 96 | 2026-05-27 |
| 8 | Kavitark Ram Shriram | Director | 169,667 | $57.79M | -$271.49M | 70 | 2026-06-01 |
| 9 | John Kent Walker | President, Global Affairs, CLO | 151,874 | $51.73M | -$180.88M | 120 | 2026-05-27 |
| 10 | Philipp Schindler | SVP, Chief Business Officer | 88,266 | $30.06M | -$82.78M | 87 | 2026-05-27 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
GOOGL Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-09-30
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
1 filing
· $28K notice value
· Last 90d:
4 filings
· $233K notice value
· 2 unique filers
· 100% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
MARSIDA SARACI (1, $149K) · ARNOLD FRANCES (3, $83K)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | ARNOLD FRANCES | Director | 83 | $28.3K | 2026-09-30 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-28 | ARNOLD FRANCES | Director | 82 | $27.7K | 2026-08-28 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-30 | ARNOLD FRANCES | Director | 82 | $27.3K | 2026-07-30 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-29 | MARSIDA SARACI | Officer | 449 | $149.3K | 2026-07-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-09 | The Lawrence Page Trust II | Affiliate | 9,680 | $3.50M | 2026-07-09 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-09 | The Lawrence Page Trust III | Affiliate | 16,880 | $6.11M | 2026-07-09 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-09 | The Lawrence Page Trust | Affiliate | 225,360 | $81.56M | 2026-07-09 | J.P. Morgan Securities LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-30 | ARNOLD FRANCES | Director | 112 | $39.3K | 2026-06-30 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | JOHN KENT WALKER JR, TTEE OF THE ARETE TRUST, UAD 8/22/2001 | Officer | 8,998 | $3.01M | 2026-06-29 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-26 | MARSIDA SARACI | Officer | 449 | $153.6K | 2026-06-26 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-06-05
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-05 | 0001193125-26-259830 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-05 | 0001652044-26-000059 | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-04 | 0001193125-26-257724 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-21 | 0001193125-26-234488 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | 0001193125-26-216986 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-29 | 0001652044-26-000043 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | 0001652044-26-000034 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-02 | 0001652044-26-000031 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-06 | 0001652044-26-000026 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | 0001193125-26-051423 | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 0001652044-26-000048 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0001652044-25-000091 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-24 | 0001652044-25-000062 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-25 | 0001652044-25-000043 | EDGAR |
| 2024-10-30 | 0001652044-24-000118 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-24 | 0001652044-24-000079 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-26 | 0001652044-24-000053 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-25 | 0001652044-23-000094 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-26 | 0001652044-23-000070 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-26 | 0001652044-23-000045 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
697 ETFs hold GOOGL
25 shown · $258.73B total exposure · 3.49% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 2.76% | $64.2B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | Vanguard | 3.07% | $53.1B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 3.06% | $27.2B | $890.0B | 2026-10-14 |
| 4 | SPY State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust | SPDR (State Street) | 3.07% | $24.9B | $812.7B | 2026-10-14 |
| 5 | VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | Vanguard | 5.16% | $20.2B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | Invesco | 3.14% | $15.4B | — | 2026-10-14 |
| 7 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 6.00% | $7.7B | $127.6B | 2026-10-14 |
| 8 | SPYM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 3.06% | $5.6B | $183.2B | 2026-10-14 |
| 9 | IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 5.55% | $4.3B | $78.4B | 2026-10-14 |
| 10 | QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | Invesco | 3.14% | $3.4B | — | 2026-10-14 |
| 11 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 5.89% | $3.3B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 12 | SPYG State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® Growth ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 5.55% | $3.2B | $56.7B | 2026-10-14 |
| 13 | XLC State Street® Communication Services Select Sector SPDR® ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 12.41% | $2.9B | $23.5B | 2026-10-14 |
| 14 | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | Nport | 4.75% | $2.9B | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 15 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 2.74% | $2.6B | $97.1B | 2026-10-14 |
| 16 | VV Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 3.14% | $2.4B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 17 | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | Nport | 3.23% | $2.3B | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 18 | IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 5.30% | $1.8B | $34.0B | 2026-10-14 |
| 19 | DIA State Street® SPDR® Dow Jones Industrial Average® ETF Trust | SPDR (State Street) | 4.00% | $1.8B | $44.9B | 2026-10-14 |
| 20 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 1.73% | $1.8B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 21 | MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 4.99% | $1.7B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 22 | VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 5.48% | $1.5B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 23 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 1.68% | $1.5B | — | 2026-10-14 |
| 24 | CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | Capitalgroup | 3.71% | $1.4B | $39.0B | 2026-10-14 |
| 25 | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 2.86% | $1.4B | $49.1B | 2026-10-14 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
17.11
TTM Diluted EPS
$19.91
TTM Revenue
$445.87B
TTM Net Income
$244.12B
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$185.68B
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $119.80B | $112.11B | $9.11 | $39.07B |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $109.90B | $62.58B | $5.11 | $45.79B |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $113.83B | $34.45B | $2.82 | $52.40B |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $102.35B | $34.98B | $2.87 | $48.41B |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $96.43B | $28.20B | $2.31 | $27.75B |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $90.23B | $34.54B | $2.81 | $36.15B |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $96.47B | $26.54B | $2.14 | $39.11B |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $88.27B | $26.30B | $2.12 | $30.70B |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $84.74B | $23.62B | $1.89 | $26.64B |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $80.54B | $23.66B | $1.89 | $28.85B |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $86.31B | $20.69B | $1.64 | $18.91B |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $76.69B | $19.69B | $1.55 | $30.66B |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-07-23
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
17.11
P/B
6.51
P/S
9.35
EV/EBITDA
24.37
EV/Sales
9.45
ROE
38.1%
ROA
26.5%
Div Yield
0.24%
FCF Yield
4.45%
Debt/Equity
0.15
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$4.17T
as of 2026-10-16
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
80.39M
SI % of Float
1.38%
Days to Cover
2.93
Short Vol Ratio
40.8%
Free Float
5.82B
Float %
99.1%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-15 • Float 2026-08-24