PIMCO Market Strategist and Portfolio Manager Tony Crescenzi tells Bloomberg This Weekend that rising US interest costs and the selloff in CoreWeave debt show how bond investors are imposing greater discipline on borrowers, particularly companies with less certain cash flows.…
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock
XNAS
61.45
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
CRWV
$61.45
—
Key stats
$61.45
- 52-Week Range
- $59.51 – $141.79
- YTD
- -22.54%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 70.92
- Straddle Price
- $14.15
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.43
- Market Cap
- $33.9B
- Open
- $65.19
- Day Range
- $59.90 – $66.69
- Volume
- 95,535,877
- Prev Close
- $69.69
Fair Value
MODEL: NEUTRAL
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.21% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.50 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 13.45% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.87% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +24.2pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +30.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-13.7B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -38.4% |
| Book / Price | 13.8% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 67.4% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -179.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 5.53 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $87.51 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $83.96 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 36.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $22.2B |
| Market Cap | $36B |
Peers used for multiples: ALAB, AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, META, MSFT, MU, NVDA
60-Day Conviction
9%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 16, 2026
$61.80
α +0.7%
rank 100%
conviction
42%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 15, 2026
$60.29
α -1.8%
rank 100%
conviction
56%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 13, 2027
$61.27
α -0.2%
rank 100%
conviction
9%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 28.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $161.34 | 14% | median 25.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $109.92 | 19% | median 11.4× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $236.77 | 19% | median 14.8× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $87.51 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $68.97 | 48% | 46 strikes · skew +0.07 |
As of 2026-10-16 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $33.9B
- Employees
- 2,189
- List Date
- 2025-03-28
- CIK
- 0001769628
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-09 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($1.57) (9 est.)
- Headquarters
- Livingston, NJ
- Homepage
- https://www.coreweave.com
CoreWeave is a modern cloud infrastructure company that offers Nvidia GPUs and other essential AI hardware with optimized efficiency to handle the most demanding AI training and inference workloads. Its cloud platform supports the development and use of foundational large language models and the delivery of next-generation AI applications to satisfy the growing demand for AI around the world.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 17.49% | 17.49% |
| Feb | -- | -10.55% | -10.55% |
| Mar | -7.30% | -0.74% | -4.02% |
| Apr | -21.44% | 42.27% | 10.42% |
| May | 151.15% | -7.97% | 71.59% |
| Jun | 35.66% | -20.25% | 7.70% |
| Jul | -26.81% | -17.28% | -22.05% |
| Aug | -1.06% | -1.01% | -1.04% |
| Sep | 46.61% | 6.44% | 26.52% |
| Oct | -2.44% | -30.69%* | -16.57% |
| Nov | -42.12% | -- | -42.12% |
| Dec | -7.07% | -- | -7.07% |
| Total | 38.23% | -34.20% | 2.02% |
* Only 2 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $82.96
SMA 50: $87.03
SMA 200: $92.45
Current: $61.39
EMA 12: $76.75
EMA 26: $81.46
MACD: -4.7143 | Signal: -2.5787
BEARISH
ADX (14): 18.49
RANGE
+DI: 13.48
−DI: 37.32
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 29.46
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 13.51
Stoch %D: 12.09
Williams %R: -94.42
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $99.18
BB Lower: $66.75
OVERSOLD
OBV: 216,188,768
Vol SMA 20: 39,558,883
Vol ROC: 301.64%
ATR: $6.08
True Range: $9.79
HV 20: 90.9%
HV 30: 90.0%
HV 60: 105.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 391
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2025-03-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis
CRWV Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH | Confidence Level: 8/10
CoreWeave (CRWV) is in acute distress with multiple converging negative signals. The stock has crashed 15% on October 14, 2026, driven by a Gartner Neocloud warning and macro headwinds (inflation/bond yields). Technical indicators scream capitulation—RSI at 29.18 (severely oversold), Stochastic %K at 7.79, Williams %R at -95.24—combined with bearish MACD (-2.81 histogram) and price trading $26.75 below the 200-day MA. The extreme 3.40 beta amplifies downside exposure. While oversold conditions create mean-reversion potential, the fundamental catalyst (Gartner warning) and macro environment present material downside risk. This is a high-risk, high-volatility situation requiring careful position management.
Key Drivers:
- Negative: Gartner Neocloud warning, bond yield surge, macro inflation concerns, severe technical breakdown
- Positive: Oversold technical readings offer potential relief bounce; upcoming earnings (Nov 9) could be catalyst
Investment Thesis:
CRWV faces a critical test between technical desperation (oversold extremes) and fundamental deterioration (Gartner warning). The 3.40 beta means any market recovery could trigger a sharp bounce, but without positive catalysts before earnings, the stock risks testing lower support levels. Current setup favors tactical shorts or avoiding longs until clearer stabilization signals emerge.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
Overwhelmingly negative (4 of 5 CRWV-specific headlines negative on Oct 14). The Gartner warning appears to be the primary catalyst, with Jim Cramer's prior bullish call creating a whipsaw dynamic. Macro conditions (inflation, bond yields) provide a headwind that independently pressures cloud/infrastructure stocks. The timing of multiple negative headlines on the same day suggests panic selling and capitulation.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Direction | Confidence | |-----------|-----------|------------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | BEARISH | Very High | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BEARISH | High | | Long-term (3-12 months) | UNCERTAIN | Medium |
Detail:
- Price at $65.78 trades $26.75 below the 200-day MA ($92.53), indicating a severe downtrend
- Price sits $19.14 below the 50-day MA ($87.92) and $18.69 below the 20-day MA ($84.47)
- EMA 12 ($81.33) still above current price, but the negative slope confirms momentum loss
- ADX at 13.95 suggests a ranging market environment, but the extremely negative -DI (41.35) vs +DI (17.43) indicates strong downward pressure within that range
Support/Resistance Levels
Critical Support Levels (descending order of strength):
- Bollinger Band Lower: $73.16 — Represents statistical capitulation point; breach would signal complete breakdown
- $65-67 Zone: Current price action clustered here; psychological support
- Recent 52-week lows — Not provided but likely below $60 based on magnitude of decline
- $55-60 Zone: Secondary support (estimated based on ATR extrapolation and historical patterns)
Resistance Levels (ascending order of strength):
- Bollinger Band Middle/20-day MA: $84.47 — Immediate resistance; recapture here would signal stabilization
- 50-day MA: $87.92 — Major resistance; typically requires positive catalyst
- 200-day MA: $92.53 — Structural resistance; return here would require significant reversal
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 29.18 — OVERSOLD EXTREME
- Interpretation: RSI <30 indicates severe oversold conditions. Historically, readings this low (27.18 points below neutral midpoint) often precede relief bounces or capitulation reversal.
- Context: This reading suggests indiscriminate selling has exhausted near-term selling pressure; bounce potential exists, but not a buy signal if fundamentals remain broken.
MACD: -2.81 (Current) / Signal: -1.83 / Histogram: -0.98 — BEARISH
- The histogram is negative and widening (-0.98), showing accelerating downward momentum
- MACD below signal line confirms bearish phase
- No bullish crossover in sight; would need several days of price stabilization to generate reversal signal
- Concern: Negative histogram divergence from oversold RSI suggests momentum hasn't exhausted as severely as price action implies
Stochastic Oscillators: %K 7.79 / %D 9.03 — SEVERE OVERSOLD
- Both values <10 indicate extreme oversold territory (scale 0-100)
- When this extreme, reversals can be swift and violent, but often precede further capitulation
- Positive divergence setup: if price stabilizes while stochastics remain low, bullish signal forms
Williams %R: -95.24 — CAPITULATION EXTREME
- -95 reading (scale -100 to 0) is near the absolute worst reading possible
- Indicates maximum pessimism and potential for sharp mean-reversion bounce
- Historically significant: This level is often associated with panic selling exhaustion
Bollinger Bands Analysis
- Current Band Position: Price $65.78 sits 8 points above the lower band ($73.16), within the lower third but not yet touching extremity
- Band Width: 26.78 (measurement of volatility envelope)
- Signal: Oversold — Confirms the technical extremity; price poised for either:
- Bounce scenario: Mean reversion toward middle band ($84.47) = +28% upside
- Breakdown scenario: Breach below lower band = continuation to $50-55 range
Volume Analysis
Critical Volume Observations:
-
Volume Rate of Change: +382.96% — EXTREME RED FLAG
- Volume spiked 4.8x above normal levels on Oct 14
- This is classic panic-selling volume, confirming capitulation event
- High volume confirms conviction behind the 15% drop (not a thin-volume decline)
-
On-Balance Volume: 183,148,795.99
- OBV near historical highs despite price decline = potential distribution pattern
- Suggests institutional players may have exited positions as price fell
- Volume flows on down days indicate selling pressure, not accumulation
-
Volume SMA 20: 35,422,542
- Today's volume (implied from +382.96% spike) = ~170M shares
- This is 4.8x the 20-day average, confirming extreme capitulation event
- Institutional volume signature: deliberate, high-conviction selling
Interpretation: The extreme volume spike on the downside is concerning because it represents consensus capitulation, not a technical indicator that typically precedes immediate reversals. While oversold, the volume suggests informed selling (possibly institutional exit), not panic liquidation that reverses immediately.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
CRWV-Specific Negative Headlines (Oct 14, 2026):
- Gartner Neocloud Warning — Primary catalyst; suggests fundamentals deteriorating in cloud infrastructure sector
- Jim Cramer Whipsaw — "Real Deal" call followed by 15% crash creates negative narrative; undermines confidence
- Macro Headwinds — Bond yield surge and inflation concerns create broader sector pressure on growth/tech stocks
- Sector Downside — Multiple mentions of market weakness link CRWV decline to market-wide factors
Broader Positive Headlines (but not CRWV-specific):
- Cloud Computing ETF guide (general sector interest)
- IREN global expansion news (unrelated competitor narrative)
Sentiment Assessment
| Category | Sentiment | Strength | |----------|-----------|----------| | CRWV-Specific | NEGATIVE | Very Strong | | Cloud Sector | MIXED | Moderate | | Macro Environment | NEGATIVE | Strong | | Overall Portfolio Context | BEARISH
Generated
News
All CRWV news →
CoreWeave's financial woes contrast sharply with the pristine balance sheets of other neocloud providers.
CoreWeave is the largest neocloud helping to power the artificial intelligence revolution.
Junk bond buyers are increasingly freezing out tech startups looking for financing, as CoreWeave Inc.’s pain raises bigger questions about how artificial intelligence companies will fund themselves.
A stock rout swept up companies from CoreWeave to Alphabet while Treasury yields tumbled.
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
Earnings History
2 of 6 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
14.44%
Avg Actual Move
14.81%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-14 | After-Close | 18.16% | 2.51% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2025-08-12 | After-Close | 15.87% | 20.83% | 1.31x | Exceeded |
| 2025-11-10 | After-Close | 15.24% | 16.31% | 1.07x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-26 | After-Close | 11.93% | 18.51% | 1.55x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-07 | After-Close | 11.72% | 11.40% | 0.97x | Within |
| 2026-08-11 | After-Close | 13.73% | 19.28% | 1.40x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
CRWV Options Activity & IV Rank
CRWV IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 102.3%
7-DTE IV: 100.1%
Expected Move: $14.15
7-DTE Move: $6.83
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-11-13)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 8,698
Put Volume: 12,468
P/C Volume: 1.433
BEARISH
Call OI: 13,037
Put OI: 18,051
P/C OI: 1.385
Total OI: 31,088
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $7.35
ATM Put: $6.80
Call %: 12.0%
Put %: 11.1%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 1,245,242
Chain OI: 3,815,893
Last Updated: 10/16/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
LOW γ vs HISTORY
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 17th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the low end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
17%
vs own history
GEX tilt
-0.59
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
-0.29
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.09
δ-decay vs time
? What is this?
· 197 ATM contracts, 320k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
100%
+25.1
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 16 · ATM 98.4% / Wing 123.4%
30 DTE / 10d
100%
+24.3
pts
EXTREME
as of Oct 16 · ATM 104.9% / Wing 129.3%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)50.1MediumOct 16
IV Rank (30 DTE)70.9MediumOct 16
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$14.15Oct 16
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.4820
Alpha: -91.74%
Correlation: 0.4605
R-Squared: 21.2%
Stock Volatility: 96.3%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own CRWV
6 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appaloosa Hedge fund David Tepper | $107.3M | #17 of 25 | new | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $29.9M | #77 of 251 | -31.7% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $13.5M | #615 of 4729 | +53.4% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $7.8M | #1766 of 6285 | -94.0% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $366K | #3287 of 3716 | -99.6% | 13F | |
| Point72 Hedge fund Steve Cohen | $299K | #1721 of 1945 | -88.8% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
CRWV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 521,500,000 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
97 filers$7.94B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.55B | 19.55% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.33B | 16.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $1.05B | 13.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Value Aligned Research Advisors, LLC | $575.31M | 7.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $430.65M | 5.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | PEAK6 LLC | $336.12M | 4.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $287.11M | 3.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $260.55M | 3.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Walleye Trading LLC | $174.32M | 2.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $172.97M | 2.18% | 2025-09-30 |
| 11 | Situational Awareness Partners LP | $140.57M | 1.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $133.59M | 1.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $133.12M | 1.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Oasis Management Co Ltd. | $124.49M | 1.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $112.40M | 1.42% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $101.00M | 1.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $98.93M | 1.25% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $90.54M | 1.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $86.60M | 1.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Citigroup Inc. Custodian | $85.11M | 1.07% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $63.94M | 0.81% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | SG Americas Securities, LLC | $60.95M | 0.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $59.17M | 0.74% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $57.74M | 0.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Hel Ved Capital Management Ltd | $54.61M | 0.69% | 2026-06-30 |
87 filers$7.72B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $2.19B | 28.37% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $1.25B | 16.20% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $812.57M | 10.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $694.89M | 9.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $295.80M | 3.83% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian | $254.40M | 3.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | PEAK6 LLC | $243.53M | 3.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $161.22M | 2.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $144.78M | 1.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $136.36M | 1.77% | 2025-09-30 |
| 11 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $117.94M | 1.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Walleye Trading LLC | $101.38M | 1.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $96.90M | 1.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $84.82M | 1.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | NOMURA HOLDINGS INC | $78.29M | 1.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Select Equity Group, L.P. | $68.16M | 0.88% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT LLC | $64.70M | 0.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $61.60M | 0.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | SONA ASSET MANAGEMENT (US) LLC | $59.72M | 0.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian | $58.93M | 0.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $49.27M | 0.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $47.89M | 0.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Marshall Wace, LLP Custodian | $45.99M | 0.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $45.74M | 0.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | WHITEBOX ADVISORS LLC | $39.82M | 0.52% | 2026-06-30 |
CRWV Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-14Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | Jonathan Jones | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | +5,392 | $78.67 | -$2.94M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-14 | Nitin Agrawal | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −22,579 | $80.13 | -$1.81M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-08 | Karen Boone | Director | Exer (M) | +1,460 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-08 | Nitin Agrawal | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −3 | $88.60 | -$266 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Sachin Jain | Chief Operating Officer | Mixed | +4 | $87.69 | -$351 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Brannin McBee | Chief Development Officer | Mixed | +64,588 | $87.69 | -$4.96M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Michael N Intrator | CEO and President | Mixed | +61,806 | $87.69 | -$6.89M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Nitin Agrawal | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +3 | $87.69 | -$438 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Jeff Baker | Principal Accounting Officer | Mixed | +3 | $87.69 | -$438 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Kristen J McVeety | GC and Secretary | Mixed | +3 | $87.69 | -$438 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Chen Goldberg | EVP, Product & Engineering | Mixed | +3 | $87.69 | -$438 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | Brian M Venturo | Chief Strategy Officer | Mixed | +61,155 | $87.69 | -$5.75M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-01 | Michael N Intrator | CEO and President | Mixed | −200,000 | $86.65 | -$26.66M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-24 | Michael N Intrator | CEO and President | Mixed | −200,000 | $86.82 | -$26.71M | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-24 | Nitin Agrawal | Chief Financial Officer | Sell (S) | −55,764 | $86.83 | -$4.84M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
CRWV Insider Holdings
18 insiders · @ $61.39
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CW Opportunity LLC | 10%+ Owner | 29,545,300 | $1.81B | $0 | 1 | 2025-04-01 |
| 2 | Jack D Cogen | Director | 9,032,784 | $554.52M | -$753.84M | 8 | 2026-06-02 |
| 3 | David J. Snyderman | 10%+ Owner | 3,309,861 | $203.19M | -$3.07B | 23 | 2026-08-18 |
| 4 | Magnetar Capital Partners LP | 10%+ Owner | 1,954,824 | $120.01M | -$6.74B | 34 | 2026-09-18 |
| 5 | Magnetar Financial LLC | 10%+ Owner | 1,891,986 | $116.15M | -$6.63B | 37 | 2026-08-14 |
| 6 | Michael N Intrator | CEO and President | 656,627 | $40.31M | -$1.02B | 58 | 2026-10-02 |
| 7 | Supernova Management LLC | 10%+ Owner | 631,075 | $38.74M | -$7.73B | 39 | 2026-08-14 |
| 8 | Brian M Venturo | Chief Strategy Officer | 450,821 | $27.68M | -$1.29B | 54 | 2026-10-02 |
| 9 | Brannin McBee | Chief Development Officer | 438,871 | $26.94M | -$1.07B | 99 | 2026-10-02 |
| 10 | Sachin Jain | Chief Operating Officer | 157,099 | $9.64M | -$7.35M | 13 | 2026-10-02 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
CRWV Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-10-13
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
16 filings
· $79.7M notice value
· Last 90d:
94 filings
· $488.9M notice value
· 8 unique filers
· 81% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
OMNADORA CAPITAL LLC (24, $296.6M) · BRANNIN J. MCBEE 2022 IRR TRUST (44, $130.4M) · KRISTEN MCVEETY (5, $31.3M) · NITIN AGRAWAL (7, $13.6M) · BRIAN VENTURO (2, $6.3M)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | JONATHAN JONES | Officer | 21,569 | $1.73M | 2026-10-13 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-13 | JONATHAN JONES | Officer | 15,811 | $1.27M | 2026-10-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-13 | NITIN AGRAWAL | Officer | 22,579 | $1.85M | 2026-10-12 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-06 | NITIN AGRAWAL | Officer | 3 | $262 | 2026-10-06 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-30 | KRISTEN MCVEETY | Officer | 5 | $438 | 2026-09-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-30 | NITIN AGRAWAL | Officer | 5 | $438 | 2026-09-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-30 | BRANNIN MCBEE | Officer | 56,531 | $4.96M | 2026-09-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-30 | BRIAN VENTURO | Officer, Director | 65,616 | $5.75M | 2026-09-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-30 | CHEN GOLDBERG | Officer | 5 | $438 | 2026-09-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-30 | MICHAEL INTRATOR | Officer, Director, 10% Stockholder | 78,552 | $6.89M | 2026-09-30 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
ETF Holders
213 ETFs hold CRWV
25 shown · $4.86B total exposure · 0.25% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.05% | $1.1B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VO Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.34% | $727.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | Invesco | 0.12% | $586.1M | — | 2026-10-17 |
| 4 | VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.11% | $449.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 5 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.41% | $378.2M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | VOT Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.80% | $266.8M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 7 | BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 1.50% | $199.2M | $12.7B | 2026-10-15 |
| 8 | ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 3.66% | $141.6M | $3.7B | 2026-10-15 |
| 9 | QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | Invesco | 0.12% | $131.5M | — | 2026-10-17 |
| 10 | IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.63% | $122.8M | $18.9B | 2026-10-15 |
| 11 | IWR iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.16% | $91.0M | $56.3B | 2026-10-15 |
| 12 | AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | Avantis | 0.38% | $83.3M | $22.1B | 2026-10-15 |
| 13 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.06% | $82.1M | $124.6B | 2026-10-15 |
| 14 | QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund | First Trust | 1.64% | $72.3M | $4.4B | 2026-10-16 |
| 15 | SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing ETF | First Trust | 2.16% | $71.8M | $3.3B | 2026-10-16 |
| 16 | QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | Nport | 1.11% | $69.2M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | Nport | 2.58% | $45.8M | — | 2026-07-31 |
| 18 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 0.08% | $44.4M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 19 | FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | First Trust | 0.81% | $42.0M | $5.2B | 2026-10-16 |
| 20 | VV Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 0.05% | $40.0M | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 21 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.04% | $34.8M | $96.0B | 2026-10-15 |
| 22 | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | Nport | 0.04% | $28.1M | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 23 | IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 0.11% | $26.7M | $24.4B | 2026-10-15 |
| 24 | QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF | Nport | 0.19% | $25.0M | — | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 0.02% | $23.6M | — | 2026-09-30 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-3.65
TTM Revenue
$7.59B
TTM Net Income
$-1.93B
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$6.91B
Quarterly figures (6 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $2.58B | $-626.00M | $-1.14 | $679.00M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $2.08B | $-740.00M | $-1.40 | $2.98B |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $1.57B | $-452.00M | $-0.94 | $1.56B |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $1.36B | $-110.12M | $-0.22 | $1.69B |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $1.21B | $-290.00M | $-0.60 | $-251.00M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $982.00M | $-343.00M | $-1.49 | $61.00M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-08-12
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
6.37
P/S
4.22
EV/EBITDA
14.43
EV/Sales
7.15
ROE
-38.4%
ROA
-2.5%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
21.59%
Debt/Equity
5.53
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$32.01B
as of 2026-10-16
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
59.95M
SI % of Float
15.44%
Days to Cover
1.75
Short Vol Ratio
48.6%
Free Float
388.39M
Float %
84.6%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-16 • Float 2026-08-24