If Alphabet keeps doing what it has been doing, it could claim the title of the world's second-largest company.
AAPL Apple Inc.
XNAS
343.75
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
AAPL
$343.75
—
Key stats
$343.75
After hours
$343.00
-0.13%
- 52-Week Range
- $243.42 – $348.15
- YTD
- +26.84%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 69.88
- Straddle Price
- $21.40
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 1.48
- Market Cap
- $4991.2B
- Open
- $346.08
- Day Range
- $340.46 – $347.82
- Volume
- 59,982,866
- Prev Close
- $342.00
Fair Value
MODEL: LONG
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 5.21% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.09 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 11.22% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 11.14% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +38.9pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +18.2% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $136.7B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 119.9% |
| Book / Price | 2.1% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 47.9% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 30.3% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.70 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +21.5% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $325.08 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $337.06 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 1.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $28.8B |
| Market Cap | $5086B |
Peers used for multiples: AMD, AVGO, GOOG, GOOGL, META, MSFT, MU, NVDA
60-Day Conviction
67%
20-Day Fair Value
≈ by Nov 16, 2026
$352.64
α +2.7%
rank 13%
conviction
96%
40-Day Fair Value
≈ by Dec 15, 2026
$351.30
α +2.3%
rank 15%
conviction
67%
60-Day Fair Value
≈ by Jan 13, 2027
$350.13
α +1.9%
rank 22%
conviction
67%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $280.33 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $251.23 | 9% | median 27.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $290.32 | 9% | median 24.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $58.82 | 2% | median 8.2× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $358.61 | 6% | median 10.7× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $325.08 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $343.14 | 19% | 61 strikes · skew -0.76 |
As of 2026-10-16 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS (3571) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $4991.2B
- Employees
- 166,000
- List Date
- 1980-12-12
- CIK
- 0000320193
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-02 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- $1.99 (7 est.)
- Headquarters
- Cupertino, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.apple.com
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone accounts for the majority of the firm's sales, and Apple's other products, such as the Mac, iPad, and Watch, are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, such as streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors and works with subcontractors such as Foxconn and TSMC to build i…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 1.97% | -3.97% | 15.37% | -0.67% | -3.22% | -4.25% | 0.87% |
| Feb | -9.60% | -5.43% | 1.36% | -3.27% | 6.07% | -2.16% | -2.17% |
| Mar | -4.41% | 6.99% | 13.48% | -4.55% | -6.68% | -4.13% | 0.12% |
| Apr | 6.88% | -9.56% | 2.11% | 0.18% | -4.79% | 6.15% | 0.16% |
| May | -5.98% | -5.77% | 4.52% | 13.56% | -5.85% | 11.39% | 1.98% |
| Jun | 10.20% | -8.06% | 7.71% | 8.55% | 1.72% | -5.53% | 2.43% |
| Jul | 6.26% | 16.97% | 2.07% | 2.46% | -0.12% | 4.98% | 5.44% |
| Aug | 4.34% | -2.66% | -3.95% | 4.87% | 14.71% | 4.43% | 3.62% |
| Sep | -7.22% | -12.51% | -9.63% | 4.59% | 10.84% | 2.43% | -1.92% |
| Oct | 5.01% | 7.64% | -1.72% | -0.13% | 5.84% | 3.98%* | 3.44% |
| Nov | 10.97% | -1.74% | 9.19% | 6.47% | 3.64% | -- | 5.71% |
| Dec | 7.77% | -12.39% | 0.67% | 4.52% | -3.97% | -- | -0.68% |
| Total | 26.06% | -29.73% | 46.01% | 41.45% | 16.85% | 17.14% | 19.63% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $337.42
SMA 50: $325.70
SMA 200: $292.46
Current: $343.46
EMA 12: $339.21
EMA 26: $335.08
MACD: 4.1326 | Signal: 0.1967
BULLISH
ADX (14): 17.74
RANGE
+DI: 27.33
−DI: 17.33
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 62.07
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 76.08
Stoch %D: 75.66
Williams %R: -20.99
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $345.59
BB Lower: $329.26
NEUTRAL
OBV: 1,941,608,242
Vol SMA 20: 37,035,306
Vol ROC: 75.73%
ATR: $6.70
True Range: $7.36
HV 20: 16.3%
HV 30: 19.8%
HV 60: 25.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-18T00:00:00 – 2026-10-16T00:00:00
AI Analysis
AAPL Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with Confidence Level: 6/10
Key Drivers:
- Technical price action trapped in consolidation range with mixed directional signals
- Low volatility regime (Beta 0.68) suggests defensive positioning but limits upside catalysts
- Options market pricing modest expected moves; bullish put/call ratios contrast with range-bound technicals
- Absence of recent news removes near-term catalyst clarity
Primary Risks:
- Volume collapse (-73.10% ROC) indicates waning institutional interest and potential breakout confirmation issues
- ADX 15.82 signals weak trend strength in range-bound environment
- Price sitting $1.61 below 20-day SMA suggests minor downside pressure
Investment Thesis: AAPL is trading in a consolidation phase with neutral momentum (RSI 52.36) and weakening volume conviction. While options positioning leans bullish and technical support remains intact at the 50-day MA ($322.31), the absence of catalysts and deteriorating volume flow suggest caution. Current structure favors mean reversion to the SMA 20 ($333.31) rather than breakout above resistance at $344.30.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available - this is a significant data gap that limits catalyst-driven analysis and increases reliance on technical signals alone.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Assessment | Rationale | |-----------|-----------|-----------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | NEUTRAL/SLIGHTLY BEARISH | Price $1.61 below 20-SMA; RSI neutral at 52.36; ADX 15.82 indicates weak trend | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BULLISH | Price above all major moving averages; EMA 12 ($333.08) > EMA 26 ($329.98); 50-SMA ($322.31) gaining momentum | | Long-term (3-12 months) | BULLISH | Price well above 200-SMA ($289.75); $42.05 above support; established uptrend from lower levels |
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Distance | Implication | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | $344.30 | Resistance (Bollinger Upper Band) | +$12.60 (3.8%) | Major overhead; breakout would target $350+ | | $333.31 | Dynamic Resistance (SMA 20) | +$1.61 (0.5%) | Immediate resistance; price pulled back below this key moving average | | $322.31 | Support (SMA 50) | -$9.39 (2.8%) | Major intermediate support; strong technical floor | | $322.33 | Support (Bollinger Lower Band) | -$9.37 (2.8%) | Oversold floor; aligns perfectly with SMA 50 | | $289.75 | Support (SMA 200) | -$41.95 (12.7%) | Long-term support; structural floor for uptrend |
Key Observation: Support cluster at $322.31-$322.33 is extremely well-defined, providing confidence in downside protection.
Momentum Signals
RSI (14) = 52.36 (Neutral Zone)
- Positioned squarely in the neutral 30-70 range with no overbought/oversold extremes
- Indicates balanced supply/demand dynamics with no momentum exhaustion
- Neither confirming bullish breakout nor signaling reversal risk
- Suggests room for directional move in either direction without requiring mean reversion
MACD = 3.10 | Signal = -1.17 | Histogram = 4.26 (BULLISH CROSSOVER SETUP)
- MACD line (3.10) trading well above signal line (-1.17) with +4.26 histogram
- Positive histogram expanding, indicating building bullish momentum
- Signal Conflict: MACD bullish divergence NOT confirmed by price strength or volume conviction
- Suggests early-stage bullish momentum that requires follow-through confirmation
Stochastic Oscillators (Bearish Divergence Warning)
- Stochastic %K: 35.59, %D: 33.91 (both in oversold territory <35)
- Indicates recent pullback has oversold short-term conditions
- Williams %R: -69.84 (moderately bearish, in lower half of range)
- Interpretation: Mean reversion bounce off SMA 20 likely; not indicating capitulation-level weakness
Bollinger Bands = Neutral Squeeze
- Width: 6.59 (relatively tight), suggesting low volatility consolidation
- Price at $331.70 = 48.4% of band width (centered position)
- Position in middle third of bands = equilibrium, not extremes
- Implication: Environment ripe for directional breakout once volatility expands
Volume Analysis
CRITICAL RED FLAG: Volume Collapse
| Metric | Value | Assessment | |--------|-------|-----------| | Volume ROC | -73.10% | SEVERE deterioration; massive withdrawal of trading interest | | Volume SMA 20 | 40.8M | Recent volume running well below 20-day average | | OBV | 1,842,566,859 | Elevated absolute level but trending flat/declining |
Interpretation:
- -73.10% Volume ROC is a critical warning signal indicating institutional participation has collapsed
- This is the most concerning technical signal in the dataset
- Breakout Risk: Any move above $344.30 would be on thin volume, reducing credibility
- Trend Continuation Risk: Without volume confirmation, momentum signals (MACD) carry less conviction
- Suggests market waiting for catalysts before committing capital
Institutional Interest Assessment:
- Low volume environment typically precedes consolidation resolution
- Absence of volume-driven rallies suggests institutions accumulating cautiously
- Risk: breakout could be false if volume doesn't confirm at resistance
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
DATA GAP: No recent news available for analysis.
Analysis Impact: This is a significant limitation that prevents:
- Identification of near-term catalysts
- Assessment of sentiment-driven technical divergences
- Understanding of why volume has collapsed
- Timing of potential institutional rotation
Sentiment Assessment
Unable to Assess — Insufficient data for news sentiment scoring.
Catalyst Identification
Immediate Gaps (Next 7 Days):
- No earnings data available
- No FDA approvals, product launches, or regulatory decisions noted
- News absence may indicate pre-announcement quiet period or between-event consolidation
Upcoming Catalysts to Monitor:
- Q4 earnings season timing (typically January for calendar-year companies)
- Product announcements (typical Apple cadence: WWDC, fall events)
- Macro economic data (Fed policy signals, inflation data)
- Market-wide events (market breadth changes, sector rotation)
Market Narrative Alignment
Conflict Assessment:
- Technical Bullish Signals: MACD bullish crossover, price above all MAs, long-term uptrend intact
- Volume Bearish Signals: -73.10% volume ROC, weak conviction, institutional withdrawal
- Sentiment Data Gap: No news to confirm or contradict technical positioning
Conclusion: Technical structure is bullish (price action, moving averages), but execution is weak (volume, breadth). Suggests market positioning for move but awaiting catalyst.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation
Beta: 0.68 (Low Volatility / Defensive)
| Aspect | Analysis | |--------|----------| | Risk Profile | DEFENSIVE — Stock moves only 68% as much as broad market (SPY) | | Volatility Characteristic | Lower systematic risk; typically outperforms in down markets | | Upside Limitation | Also means smaller participation in broad market rallies | | Portfolio Role | Suitable for risk-averse positioning; dampens portfolio volatility | | Correlation: 0.36 | Only moderate correlation to SPY — AAPL has idiosyncratic drivers | | Alpha: +0.18 | Slight positive alpha suggests minor outperformance vs risk profile |
Implication: Low beta reduces downside risk but also limits upside potential. Current consolidation fits defensive profile.
Volatility Regime Analysis
Historical Volatility Trend (Increasing): | Period
Generated
News
All AAPL news →
On Oct. 16, 2026, preorders for the new iPhone Duo sold out quickly, stretching delivery estimates into January.
Apple’s rise into one of the world’s most valuable companies was powered in large part by China. However, that relationship came with enormous geopolitical consequences. Investigative journalist and former Financial Times reporter Patrick McGee joins Bloomberg Businessweek Daily…
Deliveries of the $2,000 Duo slip to 2027 within hours of going on sale
Looking for something new to stream this week? Here’s every major new movie and show hitting Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video, Apple TV and more.
The company's latest product announcement is dividing even its most devoted customers.
A week that tested the financial markets showed the resilience of Dow Jones stocks. Apple and Coca-Cola were among nine standouts. The post 9 Dow Jones Stocks Make Bullish Moves In A Defensive Market Rotation appeared first on Investor's Business Daily .
Apple’s $1,999 iPhone Duo is drawing early demand as analysts assess whether the foldable can lift iPhone pricing and revenue.
At a market capitalization of $5 trillion right now, Apple trails only Nvidia.
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
Earnings History
17 of 23 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
4.19%
Avg Actual Move
2.93%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-27 | After-Close | 6.62% | 3.50% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2021-04-28 | After-Close | 3.86% | 0.07% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2021-07-27 | After-Close | 3.90% | 1.22% | 0.31x | Within |
| 2021-10-28 | After-Close | 2.84% | 1.82% | 0.64x | Within |
| 2022-01-27 | After-Close | 4.96% | 6.98% | 1.41x | Exceeded |
| 2022-04-28 | After-Close | 5.05% | 3.66% | 0.72x | Within |
| 2022-07-28 | After-Close | 3.66% | 3.28% | 0.90x | Within |
| 2022-10-27 | After-Close | 5.49% | 7.56% | 1.38x | Exceeded |
| 2023-02-02 | After-Close | 4.44% | 2.44% | 0.55x | Within |
| 2023-05-04 | After-Close | 4.21% | 4.69% | 1.11x | Exceeded |
| 2023-08-03 | After-Close | 3.57% | 4.80% | 1.34x | Exceeded |
| 2023-11-02 | After-Close | 3.71% | 0.52% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2024-02-01 | After-Close | 3.53% | 0.54% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2024-05-02 | After-Close | 3.81% | 5.98% | 1.57x | Exceeded |
| 2024-08-01 | After-Close | 4.11% | 0.69% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | After-Close | 3.97% | 1.33% | 0.34x | Within |
| 2025-01-30 | After-Close | 4.40% | 0.67% | 0.15x | Within |
| 2025-05-01 | After-Close | 4.30% | 3.74% | 0.87x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 4.38% | 2.50% | 0.57x | Within |
| 2025-10-30 | After-Close | 3.33% | 0.38% | 0.11x | Within |
| 2026-01-29 | After-Close | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.10x | Within |
| 2026-04-30 | After-Close | 3.89% | 3.24% | 0.83x | Within |
| 2026-07-30 | After-Close | 3.71% | 7.35% | 1.98x | Exceeded |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
AAPL Options Activity & IV Rank
AAPL IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: 27.7%
7-DTE IV: 24.5%
Expected Move: $21.40
7-DTE Move: $9.65
Days to Exp: 28 (2026-11-13)
Options Flow
Call Volume: 2,528
Put Volume: 3,731
P/C Volume: 1.476
BEARISH
Call OI: 14,015
Put OI: 9,315
P/C OI: 0.665
Total OI: 23,330
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: $10.43
ATM Put: $10.97
Call %: 3.0%
Put %: 3.2%
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 2,113,891
Chain OI: 5,214,185
Last Updated: 10/16/2026
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Dealer Positioning
TYPICAL γ
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 58th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Gamma percentile
58%
vs own history
GEX tilt
+0.35
OI-weighted, today
Vanna tilt
+0.44
δ-sensitivity to IV
Charm tilt
-0.63
δ-decay vs time
Vanna tilt +0.44: the estimated dealer exposure leans positive, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably if implied volatility changed.
Charm tilt -0.63: the estimated dealer exposure leans negative, so the modeled hedge would shift noticeably as time passes and options approach expiry.
? What is this?
· 521 ATM contracts, 1626k total OI
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
73%
+5.5
pts
EXTREME
ATM 24.5% / Wing 30.0%
30 DTE / 10d
79%
+6.6
pts
EXTREME
ATM 28.0% / Wing 34.5%
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)21.3LowOct 16
IV Rank (30 DTE)69.9MediumOct 16
Straddle Price (30 DTE)$21.40Oct 16
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.6180
Alpha: 26.47%
Correlation: 0.3220
R-Squared: 10.4%
Stock Volatility: 24.4%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own AAPL
10 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Holding company Warren Buffett, Greg Abel | $65.95B | #1 of 32 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $2.11B | #4 of 6285 | +39.9% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $2.05B | #2 of 4729 | +5.9% | 13F | |
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $459.1M | #19 of 3138 | -48.4% | 13F | |
| Markel Group Holding company Tom Gayner | $355.1M | #9 of 130 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $219.0M | #122 of 3716 | -83.8% | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $153.2M | #11 of 251 | +5.8% | 13F | |
| Bridgewater Associates Hedge fund Ray Dalio | $105.4M | #37 of 997 | -35.3% | 13F | |
| Himalaya Capital Hedge fund Li Lu | $32.0M | #8 of 8 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| ICONIQ Capital Family office | $425K | #65 of 76 | -54.3% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
AAPL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 14,872,276,250 (as of 2026-03-28)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
159 filers$74.79B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $12.48B | 16.68% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $10.30B | 13.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $9.04B | 12.08% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $5.06B | 6.77% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $3.95B | 5.28% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | CTC LLC | $3.28B | 4.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Polar Capital Holdings Plc | $2.78B | 3.72% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $2.54B | 3.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $2.36B | 3.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.85B | 2.47% | 2025-09-30 |
| 11 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $1.79B | 2.40% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian | $1.79B | 2.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Walleye Trading LLC | $1.42B | 1.90% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $1.40B | 1.87% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Citigroup Inc. Custodian | $1.12B | 1.49% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian | $939.96M | 1.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | National Bank of Canada Custodian | $889.52M | 1.19% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | ALKEON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC | $867.82M | 1.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Royal Bank of Canada Custodian | $850.49M | 1.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | TORONTO DOMINION BANK | $817.44M | 1.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $680.40M | 0.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $621.78M | 0.83% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | BlackRock, Inc. Custodian | $480.68M | 0.64% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | Rokos Capital Management LLP | $468.66M | 0.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | HSBC Holdings plc Custodian | $396.70M | 0.53% | 2026-06-30 |
224 filers$62.50B notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $7.85B | 12.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $6.24B | 9.99% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $5.83B | 9.33% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Citigroup Inc. Custodian | $3.66B | 5.86% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $3.21B | 5.13% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Goldman Sachs Group Inc Custodian | $3.16B | 5.05% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | CTC LLC | $2.82B | 4.51% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Millennium Management LLC Custodian | $2.63B | 4.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $2.43B | 3.89% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian | $2.17B | 3.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Barclays PLC Custodian | $1.93B | 3.09% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.72B | 2.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $1.57B | 2.52% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian | $1.44B | 2.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $1.21B | 1.94% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Wolverine Trading, LLC Custodian | $1.13B | 1.81% | 2025-09-30 |
| 17 | Clear Street Group Inc. | $1.09B | 1.74% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Balyasny Asset Management L.P. | $1.06B | 1.69% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Eisler Capital Management Ltd. | $1.00B | 1.61% | 2025-09-30 |
| 20 | Assenagon Asset Management S.A. | $995.40M | 1.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Wells Fargo & Company Custodian | $696.06M | 1.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Walleye Trading LLC | $629.21M | 1.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Belvedere Trading LLC | $622.15M | 1.00% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | National Bank of Canada Custodian | $567.32M | 0.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | ExodusPoint Capital Management, LP | $434.04M | 0.69% | 2026-06-30 |
AAPL Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-15Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | Jennifer Newstead | SVP, GC and Government Affairs | Sell (S) | −2,399 | $345.00 | -$827.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-08 | Jennifer Newstead | SVP, GC and Government Affairs | Sell (S) | −2,399 | $332.01 | -$796.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | Sabih Khan | COO | Mixed | +47,024 | $330.32 | -$17.46M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | John Ternus | CEO | Mixed | +25,412 | $331.22 | -$24.66M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | Timothy D Cook | Executive Chair | Mixed | −42,575 | $331.61 | -$129.59M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-05 | Deirdre O'Brien | Senior Vice President | Mixed | — | $331.76 | -$33.14M | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-01 | Jennifer Newstead | SVP, GC and Government Affairs | Sell (S) | −2,399 | $336.18 | -$806.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-29 | Timothy D Cook | Executive Chair | Grant (A) | +131,938 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-29 | Kevan Parekh | Senior Vice President, CFO | Grant (A) | +95,290 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-29 | Jennifer Newstead | SVP, GC and Government Affairs | Grant (A) | +95,290 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-29 | Sabih Khan | COO | Grant (A) | +95,290 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-29 | John Ternus | CEO | Grant (A) | +161,258 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-29 | Deirdre O'Brien | Senior Vice President | Grant (A) | +95,290 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-24 | Jennifer Newstead | SVP, GC and Government Affairs | Sell (S) | −2,399 | $340.06 | -$815.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-17 | Jennifer Newstead | SVP, GC and Government Affairs | Mixed | +12,438 | $331.25 | -$5.85M | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
AAPL Insider Holdings
17 insiders · @ $343.46
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arthur D Levinson | Director | 3,755,576 | $1.29B | -$313.51M | 64 | 2026-05-29 |
| 2 | Timothy D Cook | Executive Chair | 3,305,047 | $1.14B | -$1.21B | 64 | 2026-10-05 |
| 3 | Sabih Khan | COO | 1,152,551 | $395.86M | $0 | 5 | 2026-10-05 |
| 4 | Jeffrey E Williams | COO | 520,538 | $178.78M | -$403.25M | 79 | 2025-04-03 |
| 5 | Katherine L. Adams | SVP, GC and Secretary | 298,856 | $102.65M | -$161.75M | 38 | 2025-11-14 |
| 6 | Deirdre O'Brien | Senior Vice President | 142,435 | $48.92M | -$150.52M | 31 | 2026-10-05 |
| 7 | John Ternus | CEO | 134,033 | $46.03M | -$8.46M | 3 | 2026-10-05 |
| 8 | Ronald D Sugar | Director | 110,566 | $37.97M | $0 | 33 | 2026-02-26 |
| 9 | Andrea Jung | Director | 77,664 | $26.67M | -$21.60M | 36 | 2026-02-26 |
| 10 | Susan Wagner | Director | 69,788 | $23.97M | $469.3K | 26 | 2026-02-26 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
AAPL Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2026-10-02
? Form 144 Guide
Last 30d:
4 filings
· $34.5M notice value
· Last 90d:
5 filings
· $37.2M notice value
· 4 unique filers
· 100% under 10b5-1 plans
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
Top 90-day filers:
O'BRIEN DEIRDRE (1, $15.5M) · JENNIFER NEWSTEAD (2, $13.2M) · John Ternus (1, $8.5M) · COOK TIMOTHY D (1)
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | O'BRIEN DEIRDRE | Officer | 46,389 | $15.46M | 2026-10-02 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | COOK TIMOTHY D | Officer, Director | 218,078 | — | 2026-10-02 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-10-02 | John Ternus | Officer | 25,412 | $8.48M | 2026-10-02 | Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-09-22 | JENNIFER NEWSTEAD | Officer | 31,182 | $10.57M | 2026-09-22 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | JENNIFER NEWSTEAD | Officer | 8,632 | $2.66M | 2026-08-11 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | LEVINSON ARTHUR D | Director | 50,000 | $15.55M | 2026-05-27 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | LEVINSON ARTHUR D | Director | 250,000 | $71.19M | 2026-05-06 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-05 | KATHERINE L ADAMS | Former officer | 43,000 | $12.04M | 2026-05-05 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-23 | KEVAN PAREKH | Officer | 1,534 | $419.0K | 2026-04-23 | Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC … | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-02 | O'BRIEN DEIRDRE | Officer | 30,002 | $7.66M | 2026-04-02 | UBS Financial Services Inc. | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
Notice value is the aggregate market value the filer states they intend to sell — not a confirmed transaction. Compare to Insider Activity (Form 4) to see which planned sales actually executed. Market-wide feed: Planned sales (Form 144).
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-05-01
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 0000320193-26-000011 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-20 | 0001140361-26-015711 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-24 | 0001140361-26-006577 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-29 | 0000320193-26-000005 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-02 | 0001140361-26-000199 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-05 | 0001140361-25-044561 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-30 | 0000320193-25-000077 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0000320193-25-000071 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-25 | 0001140361-25-027340 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-09 | 0001140361-25-025275 | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-31 | 0000320193-25-000079 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-01 | 0000320193-24-000123 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-03 | 0000320193-23-000106 | EDGAR |
| 2022-10-28 | 0000320193-22-000108 | EDGAR |
| 2021-10-29 | 0000320193-21-000105 | EDGAR |
| 2020-10-30 | 0000320193-20-000096 | EDGAR |
| 2019-10-31 | 0000320193-19-000119 | EDGAR |
| 2018-11-05 | 0000320193-18-000145 | EDGAR |
| 2017-11-03 | 0000320193-17-000070 | EDGAR |
| 2016-10-26 | 0001628280-16-020309 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | 0000320193-26-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-30 | 0000320193-26-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-01 | 0000320193-25-000073 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-02 | 0000320193-25-000057 | EDGAR |
| 2025-01-31 | 0000320193-25-000008 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-02 | 0000320193-24-000081 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-03 | 0000320193-24-000069 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-02 | 0000320193-24-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-04 | 0000320193-23-000077 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-05 | 0000320193-23-000064 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
692 ETFs hold AAPL
25 shown · $645.18B total exposure · 7.87% AUM-weighted avg weight
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | Vanguard | 6.63% | $154.3B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | Vanguard | 7.39% | $127.6B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 3 | IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 7.51% | $66.6B | $890.0B | 2026-10-14 |
| 4 | SPY State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust | SPDR (State Street) | 7.53% | $61.2B | $812.7B | 2026-10-14 |
| 5 | VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | Vanguard | 12.51% | $49.0B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 6 | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | Invesco | 7.71% | $37.9B | — | 2026-10-14 |
| 7 | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | Vanguard | 15.92% | $28.4B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 8 | XLK State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 14.38% | $18.1B | $125.6B | 2026-10-14 |
| 9 | SPYM State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 7.52% | $13.8B | $183.2B | 2026-10-14 |
| 10 | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 7.96% | $10.2B | $127.6B | 2026-10-14 |
| 11 | QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | Invesco | 7.71% | $8.4B | — | 2026-10-14 |
| 12 | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 6.72% | $6.5B | $97.1B | 2026-10-14 |
| 13 | VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | Vanguard | 4.91% | $6.2B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 14 | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | Nport | 9.83% | $6.0B | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 15 | VV Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF | Vanguard | 7.55% | $5.7B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 16 | IVW iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 6.81% | $5.3B | $78.4B | 2026-10-14 |
| 17 | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 6.11% | $5.1B | $83.8B | 2026-10-14 |
| 18 | DFAC Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF | Dimensional | 5.76% | $5.1B | — | 2026-10-14 |
| 19 | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | Nport | 6.69% | $4.9B | — | 2026-05-31 |
| 20 | MGK Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Growth ETF | Vanguard | 12.55% | $4.4B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 21 | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | Vanguard | 7.67% | $4.3B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 22 | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | Vanguard | 4.11% | $4.2B | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 23 | IVE iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 8.40% | $4.2B | $49.9B | 2026-10-14 |
| 24 | IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | iShares (BlackRock) | 16.20% | $4.1B | $25.1B | 2026-10-14 |
| 25 | SPYG State Street® SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500® Growth ETF | SPDR (State Street) | 6.81% | $3.9B | $56.7B | 2026-10-14 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
41.58
TTM Diluted EPS
$8.26
TTM Revenue
$451.44B
TTM Net Income
$122.58B
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$140.22B
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-03-28 | $111.18B | $29.58B | $2.01 | $28.70B |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-12-27 | $143.76B | $42.10B | $2.84 | $53.92B |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-09-27 | $102.47B | $27.47B | $1.84 | $29.73B |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-06-28 | $94.04B | $23.43B | $1.57 | $27.87B |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-03-29 | $95.36B | $24.78B | $1.65 | $23.95B |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-12-28 | $124.30B | $36.33B | $2.40 | $29.93B |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-09-28 | $94.93B | $14.74B | $0.97 | $26.81B |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-06-29 | $85.78B | $21.45B | $1.40 | $28.86B |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-03-30 | $90.75B | $23.64B | $1.53 | $22.69B |
| Q1 '24 | 2023-12-30 | $119.58B | $33.92B | $2.18 | $39.90B |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $89.50B | $22.96B | $1.46 | $21.60B |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-07-01 | $81.80B | $19.88B | $1.26 | $26.38B |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-03-28 • filed 2026-05-01
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
41.58
P/B
47.97
P/S
11.31
EV/EBITDA
32.11
EV/Sales
11.38
ROE
115.1%
ROA
33.0%
Div Yield
0.31%
FCF Yield
2.75%
Debt/Equity
0.70
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$5.11T
as of 2026-10-16
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
120.76M
SI % of Float
0.89%
Days to Cover
3.03
Short Vol Ratio
57.6%
Free Float
13.52B
Float %
92.1%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-15 • Float 2026-05-14