SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
ETF 29.33 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $24.28 – $30.15
- YTD
- +11.48%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 39.36
- Straddle Price
- $1.35
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.15
- Open
- $29.43
- Day Range
- $29.23 – $29.48
- Volume
- 19,249,458
- Prev Close
- $29.69
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2009-11-03
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 0.03% prospectus, filed Dec 22, 2025
- Assets
- $45.1B shares × price, Oct 21, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 1.04% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $337M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 2,394 top 10 are 35.2%
- Listed
- Nov 3, 2009 NYSE Arca
- Tracking difference
- -0.04 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (96% of its variance, beta 0.98). These factors explain 99% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The funds goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. (from the fund's prospectus)
All 2,394 holdingsFlow historySimilar fundsOverlap toolAll Total Market ETFs
- May 2026
- +$191M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$633M +1.5% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$1.2B +2.8% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | +$191M |
| Apr 2026 | +$206M |
| Mar 2026 | +$236M |
| Feb 2026 | +$109M |
| Jan 2026 | +$43M |
| Dec 2025 | +$13M |
| Nov 2025 | +$982K |
| Oct 2025 | +$50M |
| Sep 2025 | +$99M |
| Aug 2025 | +$80M |
| Jul 2025 | +$161M |
| Jun 2025 | +$42M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 81 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTIVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | 97% | 0.03% | $698.3B | +14.6% | compare |
| VTHRVanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 97% | 0.06% | $4.9B | +14.5% | compare |
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 96% | 0.03% | $97.4B | +14.6% | compare |
| SCHKSchwab 1000 Index ETF | 96% | 0.03% | $5.8B | +14.7% | compare |
| IWViShares Russell 3000 ETF | 95% | 0.20% | $20.6B | +14.7% | compare |
Ranked by how much of the two portfolios is the same securities.
- Holdings vs fair value
- +2.8% 27% under, 27% over · 100% covered
- Price / earnings
- 27.4 5% loss-making · 99% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 4.8 · 3.2 revenue growth +14.2%
- Above 200-day average
- 68% 54% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 2.7% of float, weighted · 3.0 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 5% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 68% net selling
- 13F holders
- +2.5% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 35.3% of weight in 7 days; 59.2% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
| Action | Holding | Weight before | Weight after | Shares vs flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exit | CCLCarnival Corp | 0.05% | — | — |
| Increase | BEBloom Energy Corp | 0.05% | 0.10% | +18.5% |
| New position | Carnival Corp Ltd | — | 0.05% | — |
| Exit | CTRACoterra Energy Inc | 0.04% | — | — |
| Exit | Amcor PLC | 0.03% | — | — |
| Increase | COHRCoherent Corp | 0.06% | 0.09% | +19.0% |
| Exit | EXASExact Sciences Corp | 0.03% | — | — |
| Increase | DVNDevon Energy Corp | 0.04% | 0.07% | +83.9% |
| Exit | HOLXHologic Inc | 0.03% | — | — |
| New position | Amcor PLC | — | 0.02% | — |
- Authorized participants
- 8 active of 28 with agreements; top 3 did 73%
- Created · redeemed
- $1.6B · $664M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 92% creations 92% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- 0.10% of assets on loan on average; earned 0.6 bp
- Return vs index
- -0.04 pts after fees; +0.00 before; daily s.d. 0.00
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-28 | $0.0809 | CD |
| 2026-06-24 | 2026-06-29 | $0.0753 | CD |
| 2026-03-25 | 2026-03-30 | $0.0692 | CD |
| 2025-12-10 | 2025-12-15 | $0.0821 | CD |
| 2025-09-24 | 2025-09-29 | $0.0743 | CD |
| 2025-06-25 | 2025-06-30 | $0.0703 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 7.02% | Equity (common) | US |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 6.26% | Equity (common) | US |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 4.57% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 3.62% | Equity (common) | US |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 3.03% | Equity (common) | US |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 2.90% | Equity (common) | US |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc | 2.41% | Equity (common) | US |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 1.89% | Equity (common) | US |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 1.68% | Equity (common) | US |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 1.49% | Equity (common) | US |
| LLY | Eli Lilly & Co | 1.20% | Equity (common) | US |
| BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 1.19% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.15% | Equity (common) | US |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.10% | Equity (common) | US |
| XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp | 0.83% | Equity (common) | US |
| V | Visa Inc | 0.75% | Equity (common) | US |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 0.74% | Equity (common) | US |
| INTC | Intel Corp | 0.74% | Equity (common) | US |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 0.69% | Equity (common) | US |
| CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc | 0.65% | Equity (common) | US |
| COST | Costco Wholesale Corp | 0.58% | Equity (common) | US |
| CAT | Caterpillar Inc | 0.56% | Equity (common) | US |
| MA | Mastercard Inc | 0.55% | Equity (common) | US |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 0.54% | Equity (common) | US |
| ABBV | AbbVie Inc | 0.53% | Equity (common) | US |
| ORCL | Oracle Corp | 0.52% | Equity (common) | US |
| NFLX | Netflix Inc | 0.50% | Equity (common) | US |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc | 0.49% | Equity (common) | US |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc | 0.49% | Equity (common) | US |
| UNH | UnitedHealth Group Inc | 0.47% | Equity (common) | US |
| BAC | Bank of America Corp | 0.47% | Equity (common) | US |
| CVX | Chevron Corp | 0.47% | Equity (common) | US |
| GE | General Electric Co | 0.46% | Equity (common) | US |
| PG | Procter & Gamble Co/The | 0.46% | Equity (common) | US |
| HD | Home Depot Inc/The | 0.43% | Equity (common) | US |
| GS | Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 0.42% | Equity (common) | US |
| KO | Coca-Cola Co/The | 0.42% | Equity (common) | US |
| MRK | Merck & Co Inc | 0.40% | Equity (common) | US |
| IBM | International Business Machines Corp | 0.38% | Equity (common) | US |
| TXN | Texas Instruments Inc | 0.38% | Equity (common) | US |
| PM | Philip Morris International Inc | 0.38% | Equity (common) | US |
| QCOM | QUALCOMM Inc | 0.37% | Equity (common) | US |
| GEV | GE Vernova Inc | 0.36% | Equity (common) | US |
| KLAC | KLA Corp | 0.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| MS | Morgan Stanley | 0.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| SNDK | Sandisk Corp/DE | 0.34% | Equity (common) | US |
| RTX | RTX Corp | 0.33% | Equity (common) | US |
| WFC | Wells Fargo & Co | 0.33% | Equity (common) | US |
| — | Linde PLC | 0.32% | Equity (common) | IE |
| PANW | Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.31% | Equity (common) | US |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.95% | -6.63% | 7.38% | 1.75% | 3.09% | 1.29% | 1.30% |
| Feb | 1.39% | -3.30% | -3.47% | 4.07% | -1.21% | -1.12% | -0.61% |
| Mar | 0.81% | 4.71% | 2.62% | 2.06% | -4.44% | -5.35% | 0.07% |
| Apr | 3.87% | -9.47% | 0.75% | -4.09% | -1.20% | 9.60% | -0.09% |
| May | 0.20% | -0.90% | 0.56% | 5.10% | 5.72% | 4.85% | 2.59% |
| Jun | 2.13% | -8.05% | 5.36% | 2.68% | 4.38% | -0.99% | 0.92% |
| Jul | 1.25% | 8.22% | 3.40% | 1.68% | 2.31% | -0.40% | 2.74% |
| Aug | 3.00% | -3.63% | -1.65% | 3.68% | 4.05% | 1.13% | 1.10% |
| Sep | -4.97% | -9.78% | -5.39% | 4.04% | 3.79% | -0.24% | -2.09% |
| Oct | 5.50% | 5.36% | -2.55% | 0.23% | 1.86% | -0.20%* | 1.70% |
| Nov | -1.88% | 5.52% | 8.35% | 6.24% | 0.08% | -- | 3.66% |
| Dec | 4.95% | -6.27% | 4.02% | -3.53% | 0.15% | -- | -0.14% |
| Total | 18.09% | -23.53% | 19.98% | 26.03% | 19.69% | 8.16% | 11.40% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
SCHB Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level 6/10
SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) presents a NEUTRAL outlook reflecting the structural nature of a passive broad-market index fund rather than a dynamic trading opportunity. The fund is performing its intended function—providing low-cost, diversified U.S. equity exposure—but technical signals show a fund caught between consolidation and modest momentum, with conflicting directional cues.
Key Drivers & Primary Risks:
- Driver: Positive fund flows (+$1.2B annually, +2.8% of assets) and the fund's ultra-low 0.03% expense ratio (cheaper than 88% of peers) attract steady capital
- Risk: Heavy concentration in mega-cap tech (NVDA 7.6%, AAPL 6.5%, MSFT 5.2%) creates directional dependency on large-cap performance; 66% of holdings above 200-day averages suggests crowding into overbought positions
Investment Thesis: SCHB serves as a core holding for passive index exposure with competitive costs, supported by consistent positive inflows and holdings trading 4.3% above fair value. However, the fund's beta of 1.01 and current technical positioning (price below both 20/50-day SMAs, neutral RSI, weak trend strength with ADX 11.93) suggest limited near-term momentum. The bullish news sentiment reflects ongoing media favorability for the fund as a low-cost alternative, but this represents structural appeal rather than a price catalyst.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction
| Timeframe | Assessment | Rationale | |-----------|-----------|-----------| | Short-term (1-4 weeks) | RANGE-BOUND/SLIGHTLY BEARISH | Price $29.28 sits below SMA 20 ($29.65) and SMA 50 ($29.63), suggesting minor downward pressure. ADX 11.93 indicates weak trend strength in a consolidation regime. | | Medium-term (1-3 months) | BULLISH | Price trades $1.30 above SMA 200 ($27.98), establishing a longer-term uptrend foundation. EMA 12 ($29.63) and EMA 26 ($29.61) remain closely clustered and aligned above the 200-day, supporting uptrend structure. | | Long-term (3-12 months) | BULLISH | Clear separation between price and 200-day MA (+4.6% above) indicates established uptrend; consistent positive fund flows suggest sustained institutional support. |
Support/Resistance Levels
| Level | Type | Significance | |-------|------|--------------| | $29.22 | Support | Bollinger Bands lower band; immediate floor for consolidation | | $29.28 | Current | Trading at middle-lower range of Bollinger Band width (2.88 cents) | | $29.63-$29.65 | Resistance | Convergence of SMA 20 and SMA 50; short-term supply zone | | $30.08 | Resistance | Bollinger Bands upper band; near-term ceiling | | $27.98 | Support | SMA 200; strong longer-term support; 1.7% below current price |
Momentum Signals
RSI (14): 42.52 — Neutral Zone
- Reading is solidly neutral (30-70 range), indicating neither overbought nor oversold conditions
- Suggests the fund lacks strong momentum in either direction; typical for a consolidating index fund
- Not warning of reversal or exhaustion
MACD: 0.02 / Signal: -0.03 / Histogram: +0.06 — Bullish Setup
- Histogram is positive (0.06), indicating MACD line above signal line
- MACD approaching bullish crossover or recently crossed above
- This is the only clear bullish technical signal, suggesting early-stage momentum building
- However, absolute MACD values are very small, indicating weak signal strength—consistent with a ranging market
Bollinger Bands: Neutral Compression
- Price $29.28 sits almost exactly at middle band ($29.65), equidistant from support and resistance
- Band width of 2.88 cents is modest, not indicating extreme squeeze or volatility breakout
- Position suggests mean-reversion potential rather than directional breakout
- Neither overbought (upper band) nor oversold (lower band) pressure
Williams %R: -87.78 — Oversold Signal
- Extreme reading near -100 indicates strong oversold condition
- Suggests potential for near-term bounce/mean reversion toward middle bands
- Conflicts with neutral RSI; Williams %R may be signaling localized short-term weakness
Volume Analysis
Volume Trends:
- Volume Rate of Change: +31.05% — significant increase in trading activity
- Current volume elevated vs 20-day SMA (12.3M shares), suggesting institutional interest or rebalancing
- Spike coincides with MACD bullish setup, indicating volume backing potential momentum
On-Balance Volume (OBV): -12,209,886.35 — Bearish Divergence
- Negative OBV indicates cumulative selling pressure despite price holding above 200-day MA
- Data Quality Flag: OBV appearing as absolute value rather than indexed; this may reflect fund's size but warrants noting
- Suggests accumulation may not be matching price strength—potential warning sign for continuation
Institutional Interest Signals:
- Volume spike (+31%) combined with modest OBV divergence suggests institutional activity but mixed conviction
- Positive fund flows through May 2026 indicate structural capital inflows, not necessarily price-driven demand
- VolumeROC spike likely reflects rebalancing or portfolio inclusion rather than sentiment shift
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary
All six recent headlines (spanning October 2026 back to January 2025) focus on comparative analysis of SCHB versus alternative broad-market ETFs (VTI, SPTM, ITOT). Key themes:
- Cost Advantage: Articles emphasize SCHB's competitive 0.03% expense ratio
- Equivalence Messaging: Consistent positioning that SCHB and VTI offer "nearly identical" or "excellent" broad-market exposure
- Investor Education: Content targets choice between similar products rather than discussing fund performance or holdings changes
- Favorability Tone: All six articles rated POSITIVE, presenting SCHB as a legitimate, cost-effective choice
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE (Structural, Not Cyclical)
- Aggregate Sentiment: 100% positive across recent coverage (6/6 articles)
- Sentiment Type: Structural favorability (low costs, reliable exposure) rather than cyclical momentum (holdings rallying, performance outperformance)
- Relevance to Price: News sentiment reflects fund quality/structure, not catalysts for price movement
- The positive sentiment has remained consistent across 9+ months, indicating stable narrative without breaking developments
Catalyst Identification
No Near-Term Catalysts for SCHB Itself:
- ETFs don't have earnings dates or product launches
- Fund Flows: Latest reported flows through May 2026 show +$191M (latest month) and +1.5% of assets over 3 months; positive but not accelerating
- Regulatory: No announced changes to fund structure, expense ratio, or holdings methodology
Holding-Level Catalysts (13% of weight reports earnings within 7 days):
- Significant portion of portfolio holdings approaching earnings announcements
- With top 10 positions representing 35.2% of assets, earnings from NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL would drive portfolio performance
- Time-Sensitive Risk: Earnings from mega-cap holdings could create 1-3% swings in fund NAV
Structural Catalyst:
- Continued fund inflows may provide steady bid for the fund and holdings, but unlikely to create outsized moves
- Asset base of $44.4B provides scale; inflows of +$191M represent 0.43% of assets per month—modest relative impact
Market Narrative: Alignment Assessment
| Signal Category | Direction | Confidence | Alignment | |---|---|---|---| | Technical | Mixed (Bullish MACD, Bearish OBV, Neutral RSI) | Moderate | ❌ No clear consensus | | News | Positive (Structural) | High | ➜ Supports long-term holding, not near-term
SCHB Options Activity & IV Rank
SCHB IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 73rd percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
SCHB Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $4.11M | 44.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $3.54M | 38.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $1.48M | 16.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LPL Financial LLC Custodian | $338.83K | 100.00% | 2026-06-30 |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|