Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.(TMO)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $435.27 – $643.99
- YTD
- -5.31%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 64.97
- Straddle Price
- $39.90
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.30
- Market Cap
- $212.7B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.63% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.03% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.31% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +11.0pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +40bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +1.4% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.01 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $6.7B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 13.2% |
| Book / Price | 24.1% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 40.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 14.9% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.77 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +25.2% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $489.83 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $524.12 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 2.2% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $36.8B |
| Market Cap | $216B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $159.29 | 19% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $566.43 | 6% | median 30.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $729.78 | 6% | median 27.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $2085.18 | 6% | median 15.1× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $1245.42 | 6% | median 10.2× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $489.83 | 38% | stability 100% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $493.98 | 19% | 55 strikes · skew -0.21 |
- Industry (SIC)
- MEASURING & CONTROLLING DEVICES, NEC (3829)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $212.7B
Thermo Fisher Scientific sells scientific instruments and laboratory equipment, diagnostics consumables, and life science reagents. The firm operates through four segments as of year-end 2025 (revenue figures include some cross-segment revenue): analytical technologies (17% of sales); specialty diagnostic products (11%); life science solutions (23%); and lab products and services, which includes CRO services (the remainder).
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +3.92% | 23 |
| Feb | -1.30% | 23 |
| Mar | +0.91% | 23 |
| Apr | +1.69% | 23 |
| May | +1.69% | 23 |
| Jun | +0.21% | 23 |
| Jul | +5.24% | 23 |
| Aug | -0.84% | 22 |
| Sep | +0.24% | 23 |
| Oct | +0.79% | 23 |
| Nov | +1.99% | 23 |
| Dec | +0.61% | 23 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-23 | Pre-Market | 4.31% | 1.73% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2025-01-30 | Pre-Market | 4.01% | 6.86% | 1.71x | Exceeded |
| 2025-04-23 | After-Close | 3.29% | 1.43% | 0.43x | Within |
| 2025-07-23 | Pre-Market | 4.86% | 9.85% | 2.03x | Exceeded |
| 2025-10-22 | Pre-Market | 4.96% | 1.65% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2026-01-29 | Pre-Market | 4.39% | 2.38% | 0.54x | Within |
| 2026-04-23 | Pre-Market | 4.81% | 8.96% | 1.86x | Exceeded |
| 2026-07-23 | Pre-Market | 5.79% | 8.71% | 1.50x | Exceeded |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 64.97
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 46.4%
- Straddle (30D)
- $39.90
- Straddle (7D)
- $20.70
- P/C Volume
- 0.30
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.69
- Correlation (SPY)
- 28.4%
- R²
- 0.08
- Ann. Volatility
- 30.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.7%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $233.92M | 23.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $144.31M | 14.28% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $125.24M | 12.39% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $88.39M | 8.75% | 2025-09-30 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $57.80M | 5.72% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $32.24M | 3.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $32.05M | 3.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $31.11M | 3.08% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $29.68M | 2.94% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $27.36M | 2.71% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Arvin Capital Management LP | $24.58M | 2.43% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $24.23M | 2.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $18.14M | 1.79% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $16.86M | 1.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | PEAK6 LLC | $16.17M | 1.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $12.04M | 1.19% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $11.98M | 1.19% | 2025-09-30 |
| 18 | BlackRock, Inc. Custodian | $11.55M | 1.14% | 2026-03-31 |
| 19 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $10.76M | 1.07% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | Eisler Capital Management Ltd. | $7.99M | 0.79% | 2025-09-30 |
| 21 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $7.08M | 0.70% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $6.19M | 0.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 23 | BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P. | $5.65M | 0.56% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $5.16M | 0.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $4.08M | 0.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $329.37M | 24.96% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $261.15M | 19.79% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $97.13M | 7.36% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $71.57M | 5.42% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $65.52M | 4.96% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $47.38M | 3.59% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | BNP PARIBAS FINANCIAL MARKETS Custodian | $45.37M | 3.44% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $43.52M | 3.30% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $36.62M | 2.77% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Caption Management, LLC | $35.19M | 2.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $33.13M | 2.51% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Temasek Holdings (Private) Ltd | $25.36M | 1.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 13 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $22.22M | 1.68% | 2026-03-31 |
| 14 | CAPSTONE INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC | $21.82M | 1.65% | 2026-03-31 |
| 15 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $20.05M | 1.52% | 2026-03-31 |
| 16 | Walleye Trading LLC | $18.24M | 1.38% | 2026-03-31 |
| 17 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $16.22M | 1.23% | 2026-03-31 |
| 18 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $16.05M | 1.22% | 2025-09-30 |
| 19 | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Custodian | $15.27M | 1.16% | 2026-03-31 |
| 20 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $12.63M | 0.96% | 2026-03-31 |
| 21 | CITIGROUP INC Custodian | $12.19M | 0.92% | 2026-03-31 |
| 22 | Eisler Capital Management Ltd. | $11.73M | 0.89% | 2025-09-30 |
| 23 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $11.50M | 0.87% | 2026-03-31 |
| 24 | Allianz Asset Management GmbH | $7.96M | 0.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 25 | CREDIT AGRICOLE S A | $7.37M | 0.56% | 2026-03-31 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 | Nelson Chai | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | RUBY R CHANDY | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | C MARTIN HARRIS | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | Tyler Jacks | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | JENNIFER M JOHNSON | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | R. Alexandra Keith | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | Karen S Lynch | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | Debora L Spar | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | SCOTT M SPERLING | Director | Award (A) | +499 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-22 | DION J WEISLER | Director | Mixed | +418 | $451.79 | -$36.3K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-29 | Gianluca Pettiti | President & COO | Sell (S) | −400 | $462.66 | -$185.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-31 | DION J WEISLER | Director | Grant (A) | +79 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-31 | JENNIFER M JOHNSON | Director | Grant (A) | +66 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-31 | Karen S Lynch | Director | Grant (A) | +66 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-31 | R. Alexandra Keith | Director | Grant (A) | +66 RSU | — | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PAUL M MEISTER | Director | 450,000 | $250.68M | -$33.12M | 2 | 2007-01-09 |
| 2 | MARC N CASPER | Chairman & CEO | 142,533 | $79.40M | -$756.80M | 186 | 2026-03-09 |
| 3 | Yuh-Geng Tsay | Senior Vice President | 110,369 | $61.48M | $0 | 6 | 2010-03-02 |
| 4 | MARIJN E DEKKERS | Chief Executive Officer | 102,814 | $57.28M | -$123.13M | 29 | 2009-08-18 |
| 5 | Edward A Pesicka | Senior Vice President | 87,891 | $48.96M | -$55.49M | 43 | 2015-03-09 |
| 6 | Michel Lagarde | Executive Vice President | 85,151 | $47.44M | -$132.44M | 56 | 2026-03-02 |
| 7 | SCOTT M SPERLING | Director | 69,479 | $38.71M | -$3.47M | 103 | 2026-05-22 |
| 8 | PETER M WILVER | Exec. VP & Chief Admin Officer | 68,467 | $38.14M | -$67.40M | 63 | 2017-03-16 |
| 9 | Mark P Stevenson | Retiring Executive VP & COO | 67,461 | $37.58M | -$132.90M | 39 | 2022-03-01 |
| 10 | Alan J Malus | Executive Vice President | 61,542 | $34.28M | -$81.66M | 73 | 2016-03-14 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | Lagarde Michel | Former Officer | 45,940 | $22.45M | 2026-05-29 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-27 | Lowery Frederick M. | Former Officer | 14,300 | $6.47M | 2026-05-27 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-27 | Pettiti Gianluca | Officer | 400 | $185.1K | 2026-04-27 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-11 | Shafer Michael D | Officer | 1,607 | $802.5K | 2026-03-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-05 | CASPER MARC N | Officer, Director | 4,000 | $2.01M | 2026-03-05 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-04 | CASPER MARC N | Officer, Director | 5,000 | $2.55M | 2026-03-04 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | CASPER MARC N | Officer, Director | 5,000 | $2.51M | 2026-03-03 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-03 | Williamson Stephen | Officer | 6,000 | $2.99M | 2026-03-03 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-09 | Pettiti Gianluca | Officer | 400 | $216.5K | 2026-02-09 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-04 | Lagarde Michel | Officer | 22,046 | $12.42M | 2025-12-04 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | — | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-26 | 0000097745-26-000117 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-23 | 0000097745-26-000086 | EDGAR |
| 2026-03-24 | 0000097745-26-000066 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | 0001140361-26-005014 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-29 | 0000097745-26-000012 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | 0001140361-26-000871 | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-01 | 0001140361-25-043790 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-29 | 0000097745-25-000156 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-22 | 0000097745-25-000150 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-07 | 0001140361-25-037501 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | 0000097745-26-000092 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-31 | 0000097745-25-000159 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-01 | 0000097745-25-000101 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-02 | 0000097745-25-000041 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-01 | 0000097745-24-000046 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-02 | 0000097745-24-000040 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-03 | 0000097745-24-000023 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-03 | 0000097745-23-000069 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-04 | 0000097745-23-000059 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-05 | 0000097745-23-000033 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 30.8 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.8 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.3 |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.4 |
| TTM Revenue | $45.2B |
| TTM Net Income | $6.8B |
| TTM EPS | $18.19 |
| ROE | 13.2% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.83 |