ACES vs WATS

ALPS Clean Energy ETF against Corgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
28%
12 shared positions
Fee gap
20 bp
WATS is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
ACES
$93M

Side by side

ACESWATS
FundALPS Clean Energy ETFCorgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF
IssuerALPSCorgi
CategoryClean Energy & ClimateEVs & Batteries
Expense ratio0.55%0.35%
Assets$93M$548K
Average daily dollar volume$541K$20K
ListedJun 27, 2018May 5, 2026
FrenzyCap score4236
1-month return−10.8%−12.9%
3-month return−17.0%−12.2%
Year to date−19.1%—
1-year return−26.7%—
30-day volatility25.3%33.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−40.6%−45.1%
Trailing 12-month yield0.71%—
Holdings3924
Top 10 weight51.3%67.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value+19.3%+3.6%
Holdings above 200-day average1%17%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13K thru May 2026+$2.2M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility35.8%—
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

32% of ACES · 50% of WATS
HoldingACESWATS
ENPH6.53%6.42%
TSLA4.23%20.05%
RUN4.18%3.71%
ALB4.17%3.31%
AMPX2.43%2.64%
AMSC2.58%1.99%
EOSE3.10%1.56%
FLNC1.36%2.04%
TE1.95%1.20%
NRGV0.65%3.41%
ABAT0.51%2.12%
MVST0.34%1.44%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorACESWATSGap
Industrials28.2%46.7%−18.6%
Technology27.9%12.7%+15.2%
Consumer Discretionary9.3%20.1%−10.8%
Materials7.8%9.3%−1.6%
Utilities10.3%4.7%+5.6%
Financials4.4%0.0%+4.4%
Other0.3%0.0%+0.3%

More: full overlap table · ACES holdings · WATS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.