BRLN vs PAAA

iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF against PGIM AAA CLO ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
36 bp
PAAA is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.7 pts
PAAA is ahead
Larger fund
PAAA
$15.0B

Side by side

BRLNPAAA
FundiShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETFPGIM AAA CLO ETF
IssueriSharesPGIM
CategoryBank Loans & CLOsBank Loans & CLOs
Expense ratio0.55%0.19%
Assets$51M$15.0B
Average daily dollar volume$343K$152M
ListedOct 4, 2022Jul 19, 2023
FrenzyCap score3687
1-month return−0.1%+0.0%
3-month return−0.4%+0.0%
Year to date−2.5%+0.1%
1-year return−2.9%−0.2%
30-day volatility4.7%1.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−3.4%−0.7%
Trailing 12-month yield6.11%5.06%
Holdings496312
Top 10 weight11.0%11.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months$0 thru Jul 2026+$2.3B thru Aug 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 29, 2026issuer dataas of Aug 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BRLN · 0% of PAAA

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BRLN holdings · PAAA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.