GDMA vs PRTO
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF against RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
13%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
7 bp
GDMA is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
GDMA
$213M
Side by side
| GDMA | PRTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF |
| Issuer | Gadsden | RCN |
| Category | Allocation | Allocation |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.82% |
| Assets | $213M | $16M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $360K | $14K |
| Listed | Nov 14, 2018 | Mar 24, 2026 |
| FrenzyCap score | 33 | 15 |
| 1-month return | −2.6% | −2.4% |
| 3-month return | −2.1% | −0.0% |
| Year to date | +5.3% | — |
| 1-year return | +3.1% | — |
| 30-day volatility | 9.0% | 11.1% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −8.4% | −6.0% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 2.65% | — |
| Holdings | 24 | 19 |
| Top 10 weight | 74.2% | 91.7% |
| Look-through P/E | — | 20.0 |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | +10.5% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | 38% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$8.3M thru Jun 2026 | +$1.6M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 1, 2026third-party data | as of May 31, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
13% of GDMA · 23% of PRTO
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | GDMA | PRTO | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 0.0% | 2.4% | −2.4% |
| Energy | 0.0% | 1.1% | −1.1% |
| Technology | 0.0% | 1.1% | −1.1% |
| Materials | 0.9% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
More: full overlap table · GDMA holdings · PRTO holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.