GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares

ETF

ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Fibonacci levels

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

GLDM — —
Key stats
About

SPDR Gold MiniShares (GLDM) ETF

No description available.

Exchange
ARCX
Inception
2018-06-25
Has Options
No
Fund profile
Expense ratio
—
Assets
$30.7B
shares × price, Oct 20, 2026
Trailing yield
—
Average daily volume
$334M
30 sessions
Holdings
—
Listed
Jun 25, 2018
NYSE Arca
Closure risk, 12 months
0.1%
low · model
FrenzyCap ETF score
100
how it is built
Costn/a
Liquidity100
Scale100
Diversificationn/a

Moves with. Gold (100% of its variance, beta 0.99). These factors explain 100% of its daily moves over the last year.

Overlap toolAll Gold ETFs

Fund flows

This product is not a registered investment company, so it does not file the monthly flow reports that funds file with the SEC.

Similar funds
FundOverlapFeeAssets1Y
GLDSPDR Gold Trust, SPDR Gold Shares——$139.6B−2.9%compare
IAUiShares Gold Trust—0.25%$61.5B−2.8%compare
PHYSSprott Physical Gold Trust——$15.1B−3.4%compare
IAUMiShares Gold Trust Micro—0.09%$8.0B−2.5%compare
SGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF——$6.9B−2.7%compare

The largest other funds in the Gold category.

ETF Profile
Holdings
—
AUM
—
Provider
—
Inception
2018-06-25
Exchange
ARCX
Data As Of
—
Expense Ratio
—
Dividend Yield
—
Distribution
—
Chart
Seasonality
Month'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan-5.27%-0.11%4.88%-1.15%5.30%11.98%2.60%
Feb-7.13%6.09%-6.57%-0.52%1.31%13.21%1.07%
Mar-0.93%-0.52%7.21%6.66%8.07%-12.18%1.39%
Apr2.27%-1.39%0.20%1.98%5.62%-3.11%0.93%
May6.23%-1.41%-0.89%0.72%2.07%-1.40%0.89%
Jun-6.87%-2.23%-2.96%-0.95%-2.18%-10.41%-4.27%
Jul2.15%-2.45%2.18%5.11%-1.42%-0.11%0.91%
Aug0.11%-3.41%-0.26%2.46%2.92%9.95%1.96%
Sep-3.22%-2.02%-4.80%5.57%9.14%-3.98%0.12%
Oct1.37%-4.03%8.52%3.23%3.44%-0.99%*1.92%
Nov-1.18%7.40%2.91%-2.71%5.15%--2.31%
Dec2.83%1.06%-0.39%-0.50%1.80%--0.96%
Total-10.10%-3.64%9.27%21.24%49.07%-0.51%10.89%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $82.34
SMA 50: $85.41
SMA 200: $89.38
Current: $81.79
EMA 12: $82.18
EMA 26: $83.04
MACD: -0.8630 | Signal: 0.0806
BEARISH
ADX (14): 16.28
RANGE
+DI: 24.24
−DI: 32.05

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 43.48
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 45.84
Stoch %D: 56.54
Williams %R: -52.06

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $84.21
BB Lower: $80.48
NEUTRAL
OBV: 80,336,194
Vol SMA 20: 4,041,890
Vol ROC: 6.99%
ATR: $1.18
True Range: $0.72
HV 20: 20.4%
HV 30: 19.6%
HV 60: 23.7%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-23T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: GLDM

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)

Key Drivers: Recent neutral news headlines, stable price action, and low volatility.

Primary Risks: Potential catalysts lacking, increasing competition in the gold ETF market.

Investment Thesis: GLDM is a neutral stock with potential for modest gains. However, the absence of significant news drivers or earnings releases may limit its upside. The stock's low volatility and beta suggest it can be a defensive play during market turmoil.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: Neutral headlines have had a minor impact on the stock price, as there are no strong trends or catalysts driving the move.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Sideways; Medium-term (1-3 months): Uptrend; Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $91.24
  • SMA 50: $92.36
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $94.39

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI: 40.01 (neutral)
  • MACD: Bearish signal with a histogram reading of -0.75
  • Stochastic %K and %D are converging, indicating a neutral momentum

Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20 is trending higher, indicating increasing institutional interest.

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral headlines have dominated the news cycle, highlighting market trends and general sentiment.

Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is neutral, reflecting the lack of significant news drivers or earnings releases.

Catalyst Identification: None identified in recent news; however, potential catalysts could include changes in interest rates, commodity prices, or macroeconomic events.

Market Narrative: The current market narrative suggests a stable environment with no strong trends or catalysts driving the market. This aligns with GLDM's neutral price action.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: Beta of 0.40 indicates low volatility, suggesting that GLDM moves less than the broader market.

Volatility Regime: Current volatility is below historical averages, indicating a relatively stable environment.

Options Market Signals: No options data available; however, this suggests limited institutional interest and potential for low volatility.

Downside Protection: Support levels include SMA 20 ($91.24) and SMA 50 ($92.36), which can provide some downside protection.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: GLDM is outperforming the broader market (GOLD ETFs).

Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is increasing, as evidenced by rising volume on the SMA 20.

Correlation Analysis: GLDM has a low correlation with the broader market (R-squared interpretation), suggesting it can be a defensive play during market turmoil.

Relative Valuation: GLDM is trading within its historical range, indicating no significant valuation concerns.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels: SMA 20 ($91.24) and SMA 50 ($92.36) provide support levels for potential pullbacks.

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The upper Bollinger Band ($94.39) represents a potential breakout level, while the lower band ($88.09) could trigger a breakdown.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None identified in recent news; however, changes in interest rates or commodity prices could provide catalysts for the stock.

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels can be set at SMA 20 ($91.24) to limit potential losses during pullbacks.

This comprehensive analysis provides an objective assessment of GLDM's technical and fundamental characteristics, highlighting both bullish and bearish cases. The neutral sentiment from recent news headlines and stable price action suggest a cautious approach, with potential for modest gains if the stock can break above the upper Bollinger Band or below the lower band.

Generated
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5

GLDM Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: 0.7885
Alpha: -7.23%
Correlation: 0.3546
R-Squared: 12.6%
Stock Volatility: 28.2%
Market Volatility: 12.7%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time

GLDM Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-09-30
Diluted shares outstanding: 228,914,750 (as of 2025-12-31)

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

957 filers179,037,241 shares$14.27B value78.21% of float
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group, Inc. 20,057,308 $1.59B 11.16% 8.76% 2026-06-30
2 Wells Fargo & Company Custodian 10,614,311 $842.99M 5.91% 4.64% 2026-06-30
3 Morgan Stanley Custodian 8,429,598 $669.48M 4.69% 3.68% 2026-06-30
4 SBI Okasan Asset Management Co.Ltd. 7,865,470 $624.91M 4.38% 3.44% 2026-06-30
5 MAI Capital Management 7,497,358 $595.44M 4.17% 3.28% 2026-06-30
6 Bank of America Corp Custodian 7,179,195 $570.17M 4.00% 3.14% 2026-06-30
7 Empower Advisory Group, LLC 6,581,765 $522.72M 3.66% 2.88% 2026-06-30
8 State Street Corp 3,992,972 $317.12M 2.22% 1.74% 2026-06-30
9 Resona Asset Management Co.,Ltd. 3,708,700 $294.66M 2.07% 1.62% 2026-06-30
10 LPL Financial LLC Custodian 3,371,974 $267.80M 1.88% 1.47% 2026-06-30
11 Arizona PSPRS Trust 3,356,524 $266.58M 1.87% 1.47% 2026-06-30
12 Cassaday & Co Wealth Management LLC 3,334,702 $264.84M 1.86% 1.46% 2026-06-30
13 UBS Group AG Custodian 3,215,193 $255.35M 1.79% 1.40% 2026-06-30
14 Ameriprise Financial, Inc. Custodian 2,752,229 $219.93M 1.54% 1.20% 2026-06-30
15 Sumitomo Mitsui DS Asset Management Company, Ltd 2,108,788 $167.48M 1.17% 0.92% 2026-06-30
16 Cerity Partners LLC Custodian 2,003,763 $159.14M 1.12% 0.88% 2026-06-30
17 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO 1,985,600 $157.70M 1.11% 0.87% 2026-06-30
18 Stifel Financial Corp Custodian 1,866,900 $148.27M 1.04% 0.82% 2026-06-30
19 HighTower Advisors, LLC 1,770,810 $140.64M 0.99% 0.77% 2026-06-30
20 PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 1,751,574 $139.11M 0.97% 0.77% 2026-06-30
21 MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd. 1,629,472 $129.41M 0.91% 0.71% 2026-06-30
22 WealthNavi Inc. 1,614,358 $128.21M 0.90% 0.71% 2026-06-30
23 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 1,601,335 $127.18M 0.89% 0.70% 2026-06-30
24 Evergreen Quality Fund GP, Ltd. 1,487,700 $118.15M 0.83% 0.65% 2026-06-30
25 Asset Management One Co., Ltd. 1,444,626 $114.73M 0.80% 0.63% 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
Constituent Performance

Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.

Constituents
Symbol Name Weight % Price 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month