GGM vs MPRO

GGM Macro Alignment ETF against Monarch ProCap Index ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
24%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
GGM is cheaper
1-year return gap
7.6 pts
GGM is ahead
Larger fund
MPRO
$256M

Side by side

GGMMPRO
FundGGM Macro Alignment ETFMonarch ProCap Index ETF
IssuerGGMMonarch
CategoryTactical & RotationUS Equity (Other)
Expense ratio0.94%1.03%
Assets$18M$256M
Average daily dollar volume$53K$566K
ListedSep 25, 2023Mar 23, 2021
FrenzyCap score1218
1-month return−2.2%+1.4%
3-month return+0.6%+0.6%
Year to date+11.8%+6.5%
1-year return+12.9%+5.3%
30-day volatility10.3%7.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.5%−5.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.41%1.84%
Holdings57
Top 10 weight99.7%100.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.2M thru May 2026+$6.4M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 9, 2026third-party data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

39% of GGM · 24% of MPRO
HoldingGGMMPRO
XLU18.91%12.26%
XLP19.70%12.20%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · GGM holdings · MPRO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.