JMUB vs LMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF against iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
2%
53 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
LMUB is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.0 pts
JMUB is ahead
Larger fund
JMUB
$8.7B
Side by side
| JMUB | LMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | JPMorgan Municipal ETF | iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF |
| Issuer | JPMorgan | iShares |
| Category | National Muni | National Muni |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.09% |
| Assets | $8.7B | $1.7B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $176M | $45M |
| Listed | Oct 29, 2018 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| FrenzyCap score | 90 | 89 |
| 1-month return | −0.5% | −0.8% |
| 3-month return | −2.8% | −5.0% |
| Year to date | −4.5% | −6.3% |
| 1-year return | −4.9% | −6.9% |
| 30-day volatility | 6.1% | 9.4% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −7.8% | −10.5% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.55% | 4.12% |
| Holdings | 2,181 | 1,027 |
| Top 10 weight | 5.5% | 4.8% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$751M thru May 2026 | +$236M thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
3% of JMUB · 5% of LMUB| Holding | JMUB | LMUB |
|---|---|---|
| TRIBOROUGH 5.375% 12/52, due Dec 1, 2052 | 0.22% | 0.18% |
| JEFFERSON 5.25% 10/49, due Oct 1, 2049 | 0.23% | 0.17% |
| LAMAR TEX CONS 4% 02/48, due Feb 15, 2048 | 0.18% | 0.15% |
| JEFFERSON CNTY 5.5% 10/53, due Oct 1, 2053 | 0.21% | 0.14% |
| TEXAS TRANSN 5% 10/42, due Oct 1, 2042 | 0.48% | 0.12% |
| NEW YORK N Y 5.25% 11/50, due Nov 1, 2050 | 0.24% | 0.12% |
| MONROE CNTY N Y 4% 07/50, due Jul 1, 2050 | 0.11% | 0.14% |
| NEW YORK N Y 5.5% 05/50, due May 1, 2050 | 0.10% | 0.09% |
| NEW YORK ST DORM 5% 03/55, due Mar 15, 2055 | 0.08% | 0.16% |
| OHIO ST WTR 5.5% 06/52, due Jun 1, 2052 | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| TEXAS ST GEN 5% 10/43, due Oct 1, 2043 | 0.06% | 0.18% |
| NEW YORK N Y 5% 06/46, due Jun 15, 2046 | 0.06% | 0.14% |
| OHIO ST WTR DEV 5% 12/43, due Dec 1, 2043 | 0.05% | 0.07% |
| MANSFIELD TEX 4% 02/54, due Feb 15, 2054 | 0.05% | 0.09% |
| LOS ANGELES 5.5% 06/51, due Jun 1, 2051 | 0.05% | 0.06% |
| NEW YORK N Y 5% 11/47, due Nov 1, 2047 | 0.04% | 0.10% |
| RICHARDSON TEX 5% 02/41, due Feb 15, 2041 | 0.06% | 0.04% |
| TRIBOROUGH BRDG 5% 11/48, due Nov 15, 2048 | 0.04% | 0.21% |
| PENNSYLVANIA 5.5% 12/54, due Dec 1, 2054 | 0.13% | 0.04% |
| TOHOPEKALIGA WTR 5% 10/56, due Oct 1, 2056 | 0.04% | 0.09% |
| NORTH TEX TWY 5% 01/39, due Jan 1, 2039 | 0.04% | 0.09% |
| NEW YORK N Y 5.5% 11/54, due Nov 1, 2054 | 0.12% | 0.04% |
| GRAND PARKWAY 4% 10/49, due Oct 1, 2049 | 0.03% | 0.17% |
| SALT RIV PROJ 5% 01/47, due Jan 1, 2047 | 0.03% | 0.10% |
| CUYAHOGA CNTY 5% 12/45, due Dec 1, 2045 | 0.04% | 0.03% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.
More: full overlap table · JMUB holdings · LMUB holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.