iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF(LMUB · ETF)
ETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) ETF
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2025-03-17
- Has Options
- No
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-04 | $0.1647 | CD |
| 2026-08-03 | 2026-08-06 | $0.1733 | CD |
| 2026-07-01 | 2026-07-07 | $0.1624 | CD |
| 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-04 | $0.1566 | CD |
| 2026-05-01 | 2026-05-06 | $0.1612 | CD |
| 2026-04-01 | 2026-04-07 | $0.0828 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | BlackRock Liquidity Funds | 5.05% | Short-term investment | US |
| — | Commonwealth of Massachusetts | 0.85% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Washington | 0.70% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Illinois | 0.65% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Illinois | 0.65% | Debt | US |
| — | Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission | 0.64% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Texas | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | State of New Jersey | 0.61% | Debt | US |
| — | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania | 0.61% | Debt | US |
| — | Clark County School District | 0.60% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Illinois | 0.58% | Debt | US |
| — | Permanent University Fund - University of Texas System | 0.56% | Debt | US |
| — | Arapahoe County School District No. 5 Cherry Creek | 0.52% | Debt | US |
| — | Empire State Development Corp. | 0.52% | Debt | US |
| — | Metropolitan St Louis Sewer District | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | Multnomah County School District No. 1J Portland | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Seattle | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | New York State Dormitory Authority | 0.49% | Debt | US |
| — | Multnomah County School District No. 1J Portland | 0.49% | Debt | US |
| — | New York State Dormitory Authority | 0.49% | Debt | US |
| — | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority | 0.49% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Ohio | 0.48% | Debt | US |
| — | Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District | 0.48% | Debt | US |
| — | Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority (The) | 0.48% | Debt | US |
| — | County of King | 0.48% | Debt | US |
| — | City of New York | 0.47% | Debt | US |
| — | Texas City Independent School District | 0.47% | Debt | US |
| — | Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha Water System | 0.47% | Debt | US |
| — | Battery Park City Authority | 0.46% | Debt | US |
| — | New York State Thruway Authority | 0.45% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Water System | 0.44% | Debt | US |
| — | Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Dedicated | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | Commonwealth of Pennsylvania | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | City of San Antonio | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | Hurst-Euless-Bedford Independent School District | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | Washoe County School District | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| — | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority | 0.41% | Debt | US |
| — | South Dakota Conservancy District | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | State of Michigan Trunk Line | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Colorado Springs | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | Fontana Public Facilities Financing Authority | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | City of Charlotte | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | Clark County School District | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority | 0.38% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles Unified School District | 0.38% | Debt | US |
| — | Arizona Department of Transportation State Highway Fund | 0.38% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 95.76% | $1.55B | 724 |
| Short-term investment | 5.05% | $81.7M | 1 |
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.65% | 1 |
| Feb | +1.49% | 1 |
| Mar | -1.45% | 2 |
| Apr | +0.10% | 2 |
| May | -0.27% | 2 |
| Jun | +0.90% | 2 |
| Jul | -1.86% | 2 |
| Aug | -0.38% | 2 |
| Sep | +1.52% | 2 |
| Oct | +1.76% | 1 |
| Nov | +0.17% | 1 |
| Dec | -0.08% | 1 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key drivers:
- Oversold RSI reading (19.84) indicating potential buy signal
- MACD histogram is bearish, but the momentum indicators are oversold
- Low volatility and correlation with SPY suggest a relatively stable market environment
Primary risks:
- Technical breakdown if price fails to hold above SMA 200 ($50.43)
- Potential for increased selling pressure if RSI reading remains oversold
Investment thesis: LMUB is likely to experience a short-term bounce back due to its oversold condition and relatively low volatility.
Recent news sentiment impact: N/A (no recent news available)
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Medium-term downtrend (-0.38 MACD histogram) with signs of stabilization around SMA 200 ($50.43).
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels to monitor:
- SMA 20 ($49.43): short-term support
- SMA 50 ($50.00): medium-term resistance
- SMA 200 ($50.43): long-term support
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: oversold (19.84), indicating potential buy signal
- MACD: bearish histogram (-0.38), suggesting continued downtrend
- Bollinger Bands: neutral, with price trading near the middle band
Volume Analysis: Low volume and decreasing OBV suggest market indifference.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: N/A (no recent news available)
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral sentiment due to lack of recent news.
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings or major events reported.
Market Narrative: The absence of recent news and low volume suggest a market environment with limited catalysts for significant price movements.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low beta (0.11) indicating relatively stable stock performance compared to the broader market.
Volatility Regime: Low volatility, with stock moving less than the market.
Options Market Signals: N/A (no options data available)
Downside Protection: SMA 200 ($50.43) and RSI oversold condition provide some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: No sector-specific information available.
Institutional Activity: Decreasing OBV suggests market indifference, with no institutional buying or selling pressure reported.
Correlation Analysis: Low correlation (0.33) with the broader market, suggesting LMUB's performance is relatively independent of market trends.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, with price near the middle band of Bollinger Bands.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20 ($49.43): short-term support
- SMA 50 ($50.00): medium-term resistance
- SMA 200 ($50.43): long-term support
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None reported due to lack of recent price movements.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings or major events reported.
Risk Management: Monitor RSI and MACD signals, with a stop-loss level around SMA 20 ($49.43) in case of continued downtrend.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data only, and it's essential to consider additional information before making investment decisions.
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 0.11
- Correlation (SPY)
- 32.5%
- R²
- 0.11
- Ann. Volatility
- 4.4%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.8%
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|