MATR vs PRTO

Harbor Multi-Asset Total Return ETF against RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
12%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
2 bp
MATR is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
PRTO
$16M

Side by side

MATRPRTO
FundHarbor Multi-Asset Total Return ETFRCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF
IssuerHarborRCN
CategoryMultisector BondAllocation
Expense ratio0.80%0.82%
Assets$11M$16M
Average daily dollar volume$19K$10K
ListedSep 13, 2023Mar 24, 2026
FrenzyCap score1016
1-month return+0.7%−1.0%
3-month return—+0.6%
Year to date——
1-year return——
30-day volatility9.9%11.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.9%−5.1%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings2219
Top 10 weight77.2%91.7%
Look-through P/E—19.2
Holdings vs fair value—+12.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—38%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$686K thru Jul 2026+$1.6M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

26% of MATR · 32% of PRTO
HoldingMATRPRTO
GLDM6.34%7.25%
XLK3.74%2.60%
IWM2.01%21.05%
IVV13.65%1.03%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorMATRPRTOGap
Industrials0.0%2.4%−2.4%
Energy0.0%1.1%−1.1%
Technology0.0%1.1%−1.1%

More: full overlap table · MATR holdings · PRTO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.