PWZ vs VTN

Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF against Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
3.7 pts
PWZ is ahead
Larger fund
PWZ
$1.2B

Side by side

PWZVTN
FundInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETFInvesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals
IssuerInvescoInvesco
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.28%—
Assets$1.2B$144M
Average daily dollar volume$33M$780K
ListedOct 11, 2007May 13, 1992
FrenzyCap score7236
1-month return+2.5%+4.6%
3-month return−4.2%−10.7%
Year to date−4.8%−14.6%
1-year return−5.5%−9.2%
30-day volatility8.1%28.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−10.0%−24.4%
Trailing 12-month yield3.99%—
Holdings1,158—
Top 10 weight5.8%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$41M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility30.0%—
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · PWZ holdings · VTN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.