PWZ Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
ETF 22.71 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $22.03 – $24.59
- YTD
- -6.20%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 8.49
- Straddle Price
- $4.90
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.67
- Open
- $22.71
- Day Range
- $22.61 – $22.74
- Volume
- 950,702
- Prev Close
- $22.66
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- ARCX
- Inception
- 2007-10-11
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- 0.28% prospectus, filed Dec 18, 2025
- Assets
- $1.1B shares × price, Oct 20, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 4.05% paid monthly
- Average daily volume
- $34M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 1,158 top 10 are 5.8%
- Listed
- Oct 11, 2007 NYSE Arca
- Tracking difference
- -0.39 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. Long Treasuries (23% of its variance, beta 0.21); US large-cap stocks (11% of its variance, beta 0.12); High yield over Treasuries (4% of its variance, beta -0.18). These factors explain 40% of its daily moves over the last year.
Stated objective. The Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index (the Underlying Index). (from the fund's prospectus)
All 1,158 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll State Muni ETFs
- May 2026
- +$35M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- +$41M +3.6% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- +$390M +34.5% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| May 2026 | +$35M |
| Apr 2026 | +$12M |
| Mar 2026 | −$5.9M |
| Feb 2026 | +$7.4M |
| Jan 2026 | −$18M |
| Dec 2025 | +$4.8M |
| Nov 2025 | −$1.2M |
| Oct 2025 | −$18M |
| Sep 2025 | +$84M |
| Aug 2025 | +$171M |
| Jul 2025 | +$63M |
| Jun 2025 | +$57M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 81 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMFiShares California Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.08% | $5.2B | −4.6% | compare |
| VTECVanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | — | 0.06% | $2.6B | −4.9% | compare |
| NYFiShares New York Muni Bond ETF | — | 0.09% | $1.7B | −4.8% | compare |
| NYMAB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | — | 0.27% | $1.3B | — | compare |
| CAMAB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | — | 0.27% | $1.2B | −3.4% | compare |
The largest other funds in the State Muni category.
- Authorized participants
- 5 active of 41 with agreements; top 3 did 86%
- Created · redeemed
- $433M · $45M over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 97% creations 100% in kind
- Creation unit
- 50,000 shares
- Securities lending
- not authorized
- Return vs index
- -0.39 pts after fees; -0.12 before; daily s.d. 0.36
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-23 | $0.0782 | CD |
| 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-25 | $0.0727 | CD |
| 2026-08-24 | 2026-08-28 | $0.0786 | CD |
| 2026-07-20 | 2026-07-24 | $0.0784 | CD |
| 2026-06-22 | 2026-06-26 | $0.0737 | CD |
| 2026-05-18 | 2026-05-22 | $0.0778 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | State of California | 0.75% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.74% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center) | 0.67% | Debt | US |
| — | Regents of the University of California Medical Center | 0.63% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Educational Facilities Authority | 0.58% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Educational Facilities Authority (Stanford University) | 0.54% | Debt | US |
| — | Regents of the University of California Medical Center | 0.53% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles Unified School District | 0.50% | Debt | US |
| — | Foothill-Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency | 0.45% | Debt | US |
| — | San Diego Community College District | 0.43% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Educational Facilities Authority (Stanford University) | 0.42% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco (City & County of), CA Public Utilities Commission (Green Bonds) | 0.40% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco (City of), CA | 0.39% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Public Works Board (May Lee State Office Complex) | 0.38% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (Election of 2016) (Green Bonds) | 0.37% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California | 0.36% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.35% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles Unified School District (Green Bonds) | 0.34% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.34% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Educational Facilities Authority (Stanford University) | 0.33% | Debt | US |
| — | Bay Area Toll Authority (San Francisco Bay Area) | 0.32% | Debt | US |
| — | San Diego Unified School District (Election of 2012) | 0.32% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.30% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Educational Facilities Authority (Stanford University) | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (Providence St. Joseph Health) | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | California State University | 0.29% | Debt | US |
| — | California State University | 0.28% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.28% | Debt | US |
| — | Long Beach (City of), CA (Green Bonds) | 0.28% | Debt | US |
| — | San Diego Unified School District/CA | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco (City & County of), CA Airport Commission (San Francisco International Airport) | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | Los Angeles (City of), CA Department of Water & Power | 0.27% | Debt | US |
| — | State of California | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | San Diego Unified School District (Election of 2018) (Green Bonds) | 0.26% | Debt | US |
| — | San Diego Community College District | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco Community College District (Election of 2020) | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | San Mateo County Community College District (Election of 2014) | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) Public Works Board (Various Capital) | 0.25% | Debt | US |
| — | San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | Municipal Improvement Corp of Los Angeles | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | San Francisco (City of), CA | 0.24% | Debt | US |
| — | Southern California Public Power Authority | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | San Diego Unified School District (Election of 2018) (Green Bonds) | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | California (State of) | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | University of California (Limited) | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | Municipal Improvement Corp of Los Angeles | 0.23% | Debt | US |
| — | Mt. San Antonio Community College District (Election of 2008) | 0.22% | Debt | US |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | 98.29% | $1.11B | 1158 |
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 0.21% | -2.91% | 2.60% | 0.56% | -0.93% | -0.21% | -0.11% |
| Feb | -2.28% | -1.22% | -3.28% | -1.07% | 0.41% | 1.57% | -0.98% |
| Mar | 0.80% | -4.09% | 2.57% | -0.76% | -3.39% | -2.57% | -1.24% |
| Apr | 0.79% | -4.77% | -0.80% | -0.77% | -2.12% | 1.00% | -1.11% |
| May | 0.30% | 2.34% | -0.33% | -0.57% | -0.47% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Jun | 0.21% | -3.18% | 0.37% | 0.90% | 0.47% | 0.78% | -0.08% |
| Jul | 0.55% | 3.19% | -0.25% | 1.38% | -1.72% | -2.49% | 0.11% |
| Aug | -0.71% | -3.89% | -1.22% | -0.56% | 0.13% | -0.75% | -1.17% |
| Sep | -1.00% | -3.94% | -3.14% | 0.52% | 3.77% | -5.06% | -1.47% |
| Oct | -0.29% | -1.94% | -3.04% | -2.22% | 1.29% | 1.47%* | -0.79% |
| Nov | 1.12% | 5.80% | 7.88% | 1.50% | 0.37% | -- | 3.33% |
| Dec | -0.18% | -1.11% | 1.67% | -1.36% | -0.21% | -- | -0.24% |
| Total | -0.53% | -15.17% | 2.52% | -2.50% | -2.55% | -6.05% | -4.04% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for PWZ:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers: Positive recent news headlines, oversold technical indicators, low volatility
Primary Risks: High expectations, potential profit taking
Investment Thesis: PWZ has a strong technical foundation and is poised for a potential upswing, driven by positive recent news sentiment. However, the stock may face challenges as market expectations rise.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The accumulation of positive recent news headlines has contributed to the stock's current bullish momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: Uptrend; Medium-term: Bullish; Long-term: Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $23.85
- SMA 50: $24.08
- Upper Bollinger Band: $24.35
Momentum Signals: RSI (14): Oversold at 26.81 MACD: Bearish, but trending upward Bollinger Bands: Neutral, with price testing the middle band
Volume Analysis: Volume is trending downward, suggesting reduced institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Positive news headlines on PWZ's growth prospects and industry trends.
- No significant negative news stories.
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE (Average sentiment from recent headlines)
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming earnings release
- Product launch announcements
Market Narrative: The market is increasingly positive about PWZ, driving the stock price higher. However, the pace of growth may be slowing due to reduced institutional interest.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment: LOW (Beta 0.12, volatility 0.04)
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: Low (22.2%)
- Current IV: 37.6%
- Expected Move: $1.88 (42 DTE), 7-DTE: $3.10
- Volume Flow: Neutral (50 calls vs 50 puts)
- Open Interest: Neutral (50 calls vs 50 puts)
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 and Bollinger Band middle.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: PWZ is outperforming its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: Reduced institutional interest, as reflected in volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: PWZ has a moderate positive correlation with the market (R-squared 0.36).
Relative Valuation: PWZ is trading within a relatively narrow range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support at SMA 20 ($23.85)
- Resistance at Upper Bollinger Band ($24.35)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Short-term breakout above $24.08 (SMA 50)
- Downtrend confirmation below $23.36 (Bollinger Band lower)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings release and product launch announcements.
Risk Management: Monitor volume and sentiment to adjust position sizing and stop-loss levels as needed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if there's anything else I can help with!
PWZ Options Activity & IV Rank
PWZ IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
PWZ Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|