NYF vs PWZ

iShares New York Muni Bond ETF against Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
19 bp
NYF is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.8 pts
NYF is ahead
Larger fund
NYF
$1.7B

Side by side

NYFPWZ
FundiShares New York Muni Bond ETFInvesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
IssueriSharesInvesco
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.09%0.28%
Assets$1.7B$1.1B
Average daily dollar volume$40M$34M
ListedOct 4, 2007Oct 11, 2007
FrenzyCap score9072
1-month return−0.4%−0.8%
3-month return−3.0%−4.9%
Year to date−4.3%−6.0%
1-year return−4.8%−6.5%
30-day volatility6.4%8.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.1%−10.0%
Trailing 12-month yield3.27%4.04%
Holdings1,0181,158
Top 10 weight5.3%5.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$115M thru May 2026+$41M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—26.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of NYF · 0% of PWZ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · NYF holdings · PWZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.