SMH vs TINY
VanEck Semiconductor ETF against ProShares Nanotechnology ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
18%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
23 bp
SMH is cheaper
1-year return gap
22.8 pts
SMH is ahead
Larger fund
SMH
$72.8B
Side by side
| SMH | TINY | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | VanEck Semiconductor ETF | ProShares Nanotechnology ETF |
| Issuer | VanEck | ProShares |
| Category | Semiconductors | Internet & Innovation |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Assets | $72.8B | $14M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $3.7B | $99K |
| Listed | Dec 20, 2011 | Oct 26, 2021 |
| FrenzyCap score | 83 | 27 |
| 1-month return | +7.7% | +6.1% |
| 3-month return | +3.0% | −5.4% |
| Year to date | +67.5% | +47.8% |
| 1-year return | +74.3% | +51.6% |
| 30-day volatility | 30.9% | 28.4% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −24.6% | −27.9% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Holdings | 27 | 30 |
| Top 10 weight | 67.7% | 53.2% |
| Look-through P/E | 44.2 | 70.4 |
| Holdings vs fair value | −3.2% | +5.6% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 92% | 77% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$4.5B thru Jun 2026 | $0 thru May 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | 32.4% | 34.1% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 8, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 9, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
33% of SMH · 21% of TINY
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | SMH | TINY | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 91.2% | 32.1% | +59.2% |
| Industrials | 8.7% | 18.9% | −10.2% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 8.8% | −8.8% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 0.6% | −0.6% |
More: full overlap table · SMH holdings · TINY holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.