ALZN Alzamend Neuro, Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.07 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 10.30% |
| WACC | 10.44% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -156.8% |
| Book / Price | 129.5% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $1.56 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $1.35 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 3621.6% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 39.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 19.2× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $5.18 | 100% | median 3.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 3.9× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $1.56 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
- Industry (SIC)
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 6
- List Date
- 2021-06-15
- CIK
- 0001677077
- Next Earnings
- 2026-12-08
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.23) (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Atlanta, GA
- Homepage
- https://www.alzamend.com
Alzamend Neuro Inc is an early clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel products for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease. The Company has two therapeutic drug candidates, AL001 and ALZN002. Its pipeline consists of AL001, a patented ionic cocrystal technology delivering lithium through a therapeutic combination of lithium, proline and salicylate; and ALZN002, a patented method using a mutant-peptide sensitized cell as a cell-based therapeutic vaccine that seeks to restore the ability of a patient's imm…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -23.88% | 14.43% | -6.52% | -5.42% | 13.16% | -1.65% |
| Feb | -- | -24.36% | -21.04% | 5.15% | -28.07% | -7.37% | -15.14% |
| Mar | -- | -0.81% | -23.01% | 8.93% | 25.50% | -47.26% | -7.33% |
| Apr | -- | -12.07% | 11.69% | -19.20% | -33.68% | 11.76% | -8.30% |
| May | -- | -7.70% | 36.68% | -17.83% | -36.02% | 6.25% | -3.72% |
| Jun | -35.26% | -7.05% | -34.02% | -32.00% | -16.86% | 2.56% | -20.44% |
| Jul | -42.38% | 1.56% | -11.18% | -12.65% | -22.95% | 20.21% | -11.23% |
| Aug | -31.54% | 0.80% | -44.09% | -33.14% | 10.91% | 19.40% | -12.94% |
| Sep | -2.84% | 27.14% | -13.97% | -29.58% | -1.65% | 5.69% | -2.53% |
| Oct | -25.69% | -4.10% | -46.19% | -7.65% | 3.27% | -13.31%* | -15.61% |
| Nov | 0.47% | 0.88% | -21.94% | -20.97% | -13.78% | -- | -11.07% |
| Dec | -2.56% | -51.30% | -20.54% | -7.20% | -12.92% | -- | -18.90% |
| Total | -81.95% | -73.58% | -90.01% | -86.53% | -80.37% | -11.46% | -70.65% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report - ALZN
Executive Summary Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Strong momentum in bipolar disorder treatment pipeline, with multiple pharma companies involved
- High volatility, indicating potential for significant price movements
Primary Risks:
- Earnings misses or disappointing news impacting sentiment
- Regulatory changes affecting the company's products
Investment Thesis: ALZN has a strong foundation in its bipolar disorder treatment pipeline, which could drive future growth. However, high volatility and lack of earnings data create uncertainty around investment potential.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been generally neutral, with some positive sentiment from the bipolar disorder treatment pipeline. This could contribute to the stock's momentum.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish
- Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.58 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $1.74 (resistance)
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (61.62) - not oversold or overbought MACD signal: Bullish - above the signal line Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 108857.51 (increasing)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 62404379.84 (strongly positive)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The news headlines have been generally neutral, with some positive sentiment from the bipolar disorder treatment pipeline.
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral - a mix of positive and neutral sentiments
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming events: Earnings data availability or regulatory changes affecting the company's products
Market Narrative: The technical signals are strong, but the news headlines have been neutral. This suggests that the stock is driven more by sentiment than fundamentals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk - beta of 1.84 indicates high volatility relative to the market
Volatility Regime: Current: High (0.77) Historical: Medium-to-high (HV20: 53.9%, HV30: 53.1%, HV60: 62.4%)
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: Low (0.0%) - suggests historically low volatility Put/Call Volume Ratio: Neutral (0.00)
Downside Protection: Support levels: SMA 20 ($1.58), Upper Bollinger Band ($1.74)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: ALZN's sector has been trending upward
Institutional Activity: Increasing volume flow and open interest suggest institutional interest
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation: Weak correlation (0.31) - the stock moves relatively independently of the market
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range - not overbought or oversold
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20 ($1.58) - support
- Upper Bollinger Band ($1.74) - resistance
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- $1.80 (short-term bullish target)
- $1.40 (medium-term bearish target)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings data availability or regulatory changes affecting the company's products
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels: SMA 20 ($1.58), Upper Bollinger Band ($1.74); position sizing considerations: consider reducing exposure due to high volatility.
This comprehensive analysis highlights ALZN's strong momentum in its bipolar disorder treatment pipeline, which could drive future growth. However, high volatility and lack of earnings data create uncertainty around investment potential. As a neutral assessment suggests, caution is advised when considering investment in this stock.
ALZN Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
ALZN Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
ALZN Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-31| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-31 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Sell (S) | −2,000 | $1.56 | -$3.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Buy (P) | +110,388 | $1.01 | $111.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-31 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Buy (P) | +110,388 | $1.01 | $111.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-20 | Ault Capital Group, Inc. | Director | Grant (A) | +22,500 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-04 | Hyperscale Data, Inc. | Director | Grant (A) | +7,500 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-04 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Grant (A) | +7,500 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-16 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Buy (P) | +108,388 | $1.00 | $108.9K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-30 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Sell (S) | −1,851 | $2.07 | -$3.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-12-23 | William B. Horne | Director | Sell (S) | −3,333 | $2.12 | -$7.1K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-24 | Lynne Fahey McGrath | Director | Sell (S) | −30 | $2.29 | -$69 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-10 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Mixed | −60,048 | $2.39 | -$151.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-08 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Mixed | +60,588 | $2.38 | $119.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-03 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Mixed | −23,366 | $2.37 | -$64.8K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-30 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Sell (S) | −79,628 | $2.31 | -$184.2K | EDGAR |
| 2025-09-25 | Milton C Ault III | Director | Mixed | +2,994 | $2.33 | $5.1K | EDGAR |
ALZN Insider Holdings
3 insiders · @ $1.14| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milton C Ault III | Director | 118,648 | $135.3K | $17.23M | 108 | 2026-08-31 |
| 2 | David J Katzoff | Chief Financial Officer | 616 | $702 | $26.4K | 4 | 2025-03-24 |
| 3 | Lynne Fahey McGrath | Director | 32 | $36 | $4.3K | 8 | 2025-10-24 |
ALZN Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 31, 2026Directors 10
- Henry Carl Nisser · since Jun 14, 2021
- Jeffrey Oram · since Jun 14, 2021
- Lynne Fahey McGrath · since Jun 14, 2021
- Mark Gustafson · since Jun 14, 2021
- Stephan Jackman · since Jun 14, 2021
- William B. Horne · since Jun 14, 2021
- Milton C Ault III · listed since Jan 2024
- Ault Capital Group, Inc. (entity) · since Jul 29, 2026
- Ault Lending, LLC (entity) · since Jul 29, 2026
- Hyperscale Data, Inc. (entity) · since Jul 29, 2026
Officers 3
- Stephan Jackman · Chief Executive Officer · since Jun 14, 2021
- David J Katzoff · Chief Financial Officer · listed since Sep 2022
- Henry Carl Nisser · Exec VP and General Counsel · since Jun 14, 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (19)
| Jul 29, 2026 | Hyperscale Data, Inc. became a director |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Ault Lending, LLC became a director |
| Jul 29, 2026 | Ault Capital Group, Inc. became a director |
| Oct 3, 2025 | Milton C Ault III no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jan 9, 2024 | Milton C Ault III first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Sep 14, 2022 | David J Katzoff listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jun 14, 2021 | William B. Horne became a director |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Stephan Jackman became a director |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Stephan Jackman became Chief Executive Officer |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Milton C Ault III became a 10% owner |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Mark Gustafson became a director |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Lynne Fahey McGrath became a director |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Kenneth S Cragun became SVP of Finance |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Jeffrey Oram became a director |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Henry Carl Nisser became a director |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Henry Carl Nisser became Exec VP and General Counsel |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Escalona Lien became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jun 14, 2021 | David J Katzoff became Chief Operating Officer |
| Jun 14, 2021 | Andrew H. Woo became a director |
Not reported recently (3)
- Andrew H. Woo · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 13, 2025
- Kenneth S Cragun · Last reported as SVP of Finance in an SEC filing dated Nov 30, 2022
- Escalona Lien · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Jun 14, 2021
ALZN Proposed Insider Sales (Form 144)
Latest: 2025-07-11What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. An amended notice (Form 144/A) replaces the original it amends, and cancelled notices are dropped, so neither is double-counted above. A filed value that is clearly inconsistent with the share count at the stock's price (a filer typo) shows as a dash and is left out of the totals.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-11 144/A | Hyperscale Data, Inc. | 10% stockholder | 939,281 | $3.01M | 2025-07-14 | ETRADE Financial Corporation | — | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $62,633 | — | 2026-09-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 '27 | 2026-07-31 | $0.00 | $-3.03M | $-0.68 | $-1.14M |
| Q4 '26 | 2026-04-30 | — | $-2.87M | $-0.74 | $-2.80M |
| Q3 '26 | 2026-01-31 | — | $-2.20M | $-0.58 | $-1.74M |
| Q2 '26 | 2025-10-31 | — | $-1.00M | $-0.30 | $-1.17M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-07-31 | $0.00 | $-2.70M | $-1.28 | $-2.36M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-04-30 | — | $-1.64M | $-1.78 | $-688.71K |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-01-31 | — | $-1.07M | $-1.75 | $-1.42M |
| Q2 '25 | 2024-10-31 | — | $-1.42M | $-3.60 | $-3.40M |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-07-31 | — | $-974.41K | $-11.42 | $-1.06M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-04-30 | — | $-851.53K | $106.98 | $-1.43M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-01-31 | — | $-2.66M | $-33.93 | $-2.03M |
| Q2 '24 | 2023-10-31 | — | $-2.91M | $-39.87 | $-1.51M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.