Zacks Investment ResearchT3·27d ago
ASPS Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A.
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
ASPS
—
—
Key stats
Fair Value
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.96% |
| WACC | 6.46% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +20.9% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 9.8% |
| Book / Price | -177.7% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.6% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -1.3% |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $5.70 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $5.89 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 383.4% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.2B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Blended Fair Value
—
Deviation
—
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/B | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $5.70 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-27 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS SERVICES (7380) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.1B
- Employees
- 1,236
- List Date
- 2009-08-06
- CIK
- 0001462418
- Next Earnings
- 2026-10-29 (Pre-Market)
- EPS Forecast
- $0.08 (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Grand Duchy Of Luxembourg, N4
- Homepage
- https://www.altisource.com
Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA is an integrated service provider and marketplace for the real estate and mortgage industries. It operates via two reportable segments, namely Servicer and Real Estate, which derive maximum revenue, and Origination. The Servicer and Real Estate segment provides loan servicers and real estate investors with solutions and technologies that span the mortgage and real estate lifecycle. The Origination segment provides originators with solutions and technologies that span the mortgage origination lifecycle. Altisource mainly serves financial institutions, governmen…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -17.91% | -3.19% | -31.84% | -11.01% | -1.28% | -22.96% | -14.70% |
| Feb | -2.68% | 12.77% | -1.03% | -0.71% | 6.17% | 54.88% | 11.57% |
| Mar | -9.90% | -0.25% | -19.30% | -32.64% | -0.32% | -16.51% | -13.15% |
| Apr | -30.46% | -5.00% | -16.33% | 5.29% | 209.04% | 3.42% | 27.66% |
| May | 6.89% | -0.10% | 23.94% | -4.57% | -31.13% | -3.83% | -1.47% |
| Jun | 20.79% | 3.92% | 15.85% | -27.32% | 39.15% | 16.46% | 11.47% |
| Jul | 9.22% | 6.83% | -10.89% | -5.00% | 24.66% | -22.53% | 0.38% |
| Aug | 13.38% | 4.55% | -18.76% | -14.07% | 1.24% | -0.72% | -2.40% |
| Sep | -9.52% | 15.00% | -6.99% | 7.14% | 2.91% | 18.62% | 4.53% |
| Oct | 29.48% | -9.06% | -6.47% | 1.68% | -25.08% | -7.78%* | -2.87% |
| Nov | -22.73% | 34.01% | 12.07% | -27.05% | 7.28% | -- | 0.72% |
| Dec | 1.45% | -34.71% | -18.91% | -19.33% | -18.33% | -- | -17.97% |
| Total | -26.50% | 9.77% | -62.57% | -77.25% | 163.79% | -2.92% | 0.72% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $5.86
SMA 50: $5.71
SMA 200: $6.19
Current: $5.69
EMA 12: $5.67
EMA 26: $5.73
MACD: -0.0633 | Signal: -0.0309
BEARISH
ADX (14): 12.16
RANGE
+DI: 16.95
−DI: 21.37
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 49.04
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 39.13
Stoch %D: 31.98
Williams %R: -51.00
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $6.53
BB Lower: $5.20
NEUTRAL
OBV: -221,469
Vol SMA 20: 14,134
Vol ROC: -49.73%
ATR: $0.39
True Range: $0.36
HV 20: 66.0%
HV 30: 70.2%
HV 60: 56.6%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL with confidence level (6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Bullish technical signals from MACD, RSI, and Stochastic indicators
- Positive recent news headlines highlighting company developments and performance
- Low volatility and beta indicate reduced risk
Primary Risks:
- Consolidation phase could lead to sideways trading or minor pullbacks
- Earnings expectations may impact stock price if not met
Investment Thesis: ASPS appears to be in a consolidation phase, with bullish technical signals and positive news sentiment. However, the low volatility and beta suggest reduced risk, making it an attractive option for investors seeking stability.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have been generally positive, highlighting company developments and performance. This has contributed to the overall neutral assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidation phase
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish trend
- Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish trend
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $7.01 (support)
- SMA 50: $6.71 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $7.54 (resistance)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI: 59.29 (neutral)
- MACD: Bullish signal line crossover
- Stochastic %K/D: Neutral
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 16303.70 (support)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 431055.13 (bullish)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- Positive news highlighting company developments and performance
- General market commentary and routine announcements
Sentiment Assessment: Neutral, with a slight positive bias due to recent news headlines.
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming earnings report (no specific date available)
- Stakeholder warrants distribution (April 3, 2025)
Market Narrative: The recent news headlines have been generally positive, highlighting company developments and performance. This has contributed to the overall neutral assessment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta <0.8).
Volatility Regime: Current volatility is low compared to historical levels.
Options Market Signals:
- IV Rank: 0.0% (Low)
- Put/Call Volume Ratio: 0.00 (Neutral sentiment)
Downside Protection: Support levels at SMA 20 and Bollinger Band lower boundary provide some downside protection.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
- Real Estate sector performance has been mixed, with ASPS slightly outperforming the broader market
Institutional Activity:
- Institutional interest is moderate, with a slight increase in volume flow
Correlation Analysis: The stock has shown low correlation to the market, suggesting reduced risk.
Relative Valuation: ASPS is trading within its historical range, indicating no clear relative value imbalance.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $7.01 (support)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $7.54 (resistance)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Short-term breakout above upper Bollinger Band: Bullish signal
- Short-term breakdown below SMA 20: Bearish signal
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Upcoming earnings report (no specific date available)
- Stakeholder warrants distribution (April 3, 2025)
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at SMA 20 and Bollinger Band lower boundary to manage risk. Position sizing considerations are moderate, with a slight bias towards increased exposure.
By analyzing the provided data, ASPS appears to be in a consolidation phase, with bullish technical signals and positive news sentiment. The low volatility and beta suggest reduced risk, making it an attractive option for investors seeking stability. However, the company's recent performance and future expectations may impact stock price if not met, highlighting the need for ongoing monitoring and risk management.
Generated
News
All ASPS news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·8mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·14mo ago
The Motley FoolT3·15mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·15mo ago
BenzingaT3·19mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·30mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·30mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·30mo ago
BenzingaT3·31mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
Earnings History
4 of 9 under expected move
Avg Expected Move
5.13%
Avg Actual Move
5.46%
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-10 | After-Close | 7.10% | 5.01% | 0.71x | Within |
| 2021-07-29 | Pre-Market | 1.35% | 5.75% | 4.26x | Exceeded |
| 2021-11-04 | After-Close | 12.68% | 0.48% | 0.04x | Within |
| 2022-03-03 | After-Close | 7.64% | 3.12% | 0.41x | Within |
| 2022-04-28 | unknown | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.35x | Exceeded |
| 2022-07-28 | unknown | 1.37% | 2.53% | 1.85x | Exceeded |
| 2022-11-03 | After-Close | 2.54% | 5.22% | 2.06x | Exceeded |
| 2023-02-03 | Pre-Market | 4.00% | 24.44% | 6.11x | Exceeded |
| 2023-03-30 | unknown | 8.58% | 1.29% | 0.15x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
ASPS Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: —
7-DTE Move: —
Days to Exp: — (Unknown)
Options Flow
Call Volume: —
Put Volume: —
P/C Volume: —
Call OI: —
Put OI: —
P/C OI: —
Total OI: —
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: —
ATM Put: —
Call %: —
Put %: —
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 0
Chain OI: 0
Last Updated: 7/21/2023
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Apr 13 · No data
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
as of Apr 13 · No data
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 0.0851
Alpha: -33.57%
Correlation: 0.0143
R-Squared: 0.0%
Stock Volatility: 75.5%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own ASPS
2 of 37 tracked investors
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $402K | #2680 of 3138 | -4.6% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $107K | #5767 of 6285 | +2.4% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
ASPS Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 11,127,500 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
ASPS Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-24Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-24 | Matthew T. Winkler | Director | Buy (P) | +2,000 | $5.60 | $11.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | Joseph L Morettini | Director | Sell (S) | −93,188 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-14 | Joseph L Morettini | Director | Sell (S) | −18,500 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-07 | Joseph L Morettini | Director | Sell (S) | −20,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-07 | Joseph L Morettini | Director | Sell (S) | −20,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-04 | Benefit Street Partners LLC | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +50,000 | $5.77 | $288.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-31 | Matthew T. Winkler | Director | Buy (P) | +1,701 | $5.07 | $8.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-30 | Joseph L Morettini | Director | Sell (S) | −37,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-07-29 | William B Shepro | Chair and CEO | Buy (P) | +4,000 | $5.18 | $20.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-29 | Joseph L Morettini | Director | Sell (S) | −74,071 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-04-09 | Gregory J. Ritts | Chief Legal/Compliance Officer | Buy (P) | +20,000 | $0.48 | $9.6K | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-08 | William B Shepro | Chairman and CEO | Mixed | +8,053,434 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-04-07 | Michelle D. Esterman | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +2,914,270 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-04-07 | Roland Mueller-Ineichen | Director | Grant (A) | +349,810 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-04-07 | John G Aldridge Jr | Director | Grant (A) | +308,932 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
ASPS Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $5.69
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benefit Street Partners LLC | 10%+ Owner | 1,754,054 | $9.98M | $288.5K | 1 | 2026-08-04 |
| 2 | Michael Craig-Scheckman | 10%+ Owner | 840,816 | $4.78M | $79.91M | 6 | 2025-03-05 |
| 3 | William B Shepro | Chair and CEO | 257,064 | $1.46M | -$1.36M | 86 | 2026-07-29 |
| 4 | Michelle D. Esterman | Chief Financial Officer | 165,562 | $942.0K | $233.4K | 64 | 2025-04-07 |
| 5 | Matthew T. Winkler | Director | 41,989 | $238.9K | $19.8K | 2 | 2026-08-24 |
| 6 | Gregory J. Ritts | Chief Legal/Compliance Officer | 34,005 | $193.5K | $36.7K | 63 | 2025-04-09 |
| 7 | Roland Mueller-Ineichen | Director | 27,333 | $155.5K | $713.9K | 22 | 2025-04-07 |
| 8 | John G Aldridge Jr | Director | 22,160 | $126.1K | $200.0K | 6 | 2025-04-07 |
| 9 | Joseph L Morettini | Director | 21,524 | $122.5K | $0 | 15 | 2026-08-19 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ASPS Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 24, 2026Directors 7
- Roland Mueller-Ineichen · since Aug 10, 2009
- William B Shepro · since Aug 10, 2009
- Joseph L Morettini · since May 17, 2017
- Mary Hickok · since Mar 1, 2022
- John G Aldridge Jr · since May 17, 2022
- Matthew T. Winkler · since May 13, 2025
- Wesley G Iseley · since May 13, 2025
Officers 3
- William B Shepro · Chairman and CEO · listed since Oct 2019
- Michelle D. Esterman · Chief Financial Officer · listed since Jan 2019
- Gregory J. Ritts · Chief Legal/Compliance Officer · listed since Apr 2018
10% owners 7
- AgateCreek LLC (entity) · on file since Nov 2017
- Benefit Street Partners LLC (entity) · since Mar 28, 2025
- Deer Park Road Corp (entity) · since May 10, 2017
- Deer Park Road Management Company, LP (entity) · listed since May 2017
- Deer Park Road Management GP, LLC (entity) · since May 10, 2017
- Michael Craig-Scheckman · since May 10, 2017
- Scott Edward Burg · on file since Nov 2017
Changes in the last 10 years (32)
| May 13, 2025 | Wesley G Iseley became a director |
| May 13, 2025 | Matthew T. Winkler became a director |
| Mar 28, 2025 | Benefit Street Partners LLC became a 10% owner |
| May 17, 2022 | John G Aldridge Jr became a director |
| Mar 17, 2022 | Deer Park Road Management Company, LP no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Mar 1, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Scott Edward Burg from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 1, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Scott Edward Burg from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 1, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Scott Edward Burg from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 1, 2022 | Mary Hickok became a director |
| Feb 14, 2022 | Scott Edward Burg first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Jul 10, 2020 | Scott Edward Burg first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Nov 4, 2019 | Deer Park Road Management Company, LP first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Oct 30, 2019 | William B Shepro listed as Chairman and CEO (previously Chief Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Aug 5, 2019 | Marcello Mastioni listed as Chief Operating Officer (previously Pres, Real Estate Marketplace) in SEC filings |
| Jan 31, 2019 | Michelle D. Esterman listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously EVP, Finance) in SEC filings |
| Dec 14, 2018 | Marcello Mastioni became Pres, Real Estate Marketplace |
| Sep 27, 2018 | Scott Edward Burg first listed as a director in an SEC filing |
| Apr 10, 2018 | Gregory J. Ritts listed as Chief Legal/Compliance Officer (previously General Counsel) in SEC filings |
| Feb 14, 2018 | Michelle D. Esterman listed as EVP, Finance (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Nov 13, 2017 | Scott Edward Burg first on file as a 10% owner |
| Nov 13, 2017 | AgateCreek LLC first on file as a 10% owner |
| Oct 5, 2017 | Indroneel Chatterjee became Chief Financial Officer |
| May 17, 2017 | Joseph L Morettini became a director |
| May 12, 2017 | Deer Park Road Management Company, LP first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| May 10, 2017 | Michael Craig-Scheckman became a 10% owner |
| May 10, 2017 | Deer Park Road Management GP, LLC became a 10% owner |
| May 10, 2017 | Deer Park Road Corp became a 10% owner |
| Apr 11, 2017 | Kevin James Wilcox listed as Chief Admin & Risk Officer (previously Chief Administration Officer) in SEC filings |
| Apr 11, 2017 | Joseph A. Davila listed as President, Servicer Solutions (previously President, Mortgage Services) in SEC filings |
| Mar 29, 2017 | Deer Park Road Management Company, LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Mar 21, 2017 | Deer Park Road Management Company, LP became a 10% owner |
| Nov 2, 2016 | Leon G Cooperman reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
Not reported recently (8)
- Marcello Mastioni · Last reported as Chief Operating Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 23, 2021
- Kevin James Wilcox · Last reported as Chief Admin & Risk Officer in an SEC filing dated Mar 24, 2020
- W Michael Linn · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 10, 2019
- Joseph A. Davila · Last reported as President, Servicer Solutions in an SEC filing dated Nov 15, 2018
- Timo Vatto · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 17, 2018
- Orin S Kramer · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 17, 2018
- Indroneel Chatterjee · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Feb 14, 2018
- Vivek Bhandari · Last reported as President, REIS in an SEC filing dated Apr 18, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
2 ETFs hold ASPS
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-0.99
TTM Revenue
$182.50M
TTM Net Income
$-10.82M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-1.96M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $50.66M | $-562.00K | $-0.05 | $-6.63M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $47.58M | $-635.00K | $-0.06 | $4.45M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $42.34M | $-7.23M | $-0.66 | $-505.00K |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $41.91M | $-2.40M | $-0.22 | $718.00K |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $43.29M | $16.58M | $1.48 | $-306.00K |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $43.44M | $-5.34M | $-0.74 | $-4.97M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $41.01M | $-8.77M | $-2.44 | $-1.40M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $40.53M | $-9.36M | $-2.61 | $-1.57M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $39.12M | $-8.31M | $-2.33 | $180.00K |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $39.47M | $-9.20M | $-2.64 | $-2.24M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $34.16M | $-13.15M | $-1.25 | $-4.24M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $36.21M | $-11.34M | $-1.55 | $-6.66M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-07-23
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
—
P/S
0.35
EV/EBITDA
20.77
EV/Sales
1.23
ROE
—
ROA
-7.9%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-3.10%
Debt/Equity
—
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$63.32M
as of 2026-10-27
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
151.47K
SI % of Float
1.38%
Days to Cover
12.34
Short Vol Ratio
7.6%
Free Float
10.97M
Float %
96.1%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-26 • Float 2026-08-07