BBLG Bone Biologics Corp Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- ORTHOPEDIC, PROSTHETIC & SURGICAL APPLIANCES & SUPPLIES (3842) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 2
- List Date
- 2015-11-27
- CIK
- 0001419554
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.19) (1 est.)
- Headquarters
- Burlington, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.bonebiologics.com
Bone Biologics Corp a medical device company that is currently focused on bone regeneration in spinal fusion using the recombinant human protein known as NELL-1. NELL-1 in combination with DBM, demineralized bone matrix, is an osteopromotive recombinant protein that provides target specific control over bone regeneration. It is a clinical-stage entity. The production and marketing of its products and ongoing research and development activities are subject to extensive regulation by numerous governmental authorities in the United States.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -40.56% | 33.30% | -12.32% | 13.05% | 6.49% | -0.01% |
| Feb | -- | -14.55% | -0.14% | -26.65% | -30.02% | -29.33% | -20.14% |
| Mar | -- | 53.59% | -18.45% | -12.35% | -2.62% | -7.56% | 2.52% |
| Apr | -- | -16.15% | -3.67% | -26.69% | -19.41% | 11.21% | -10.94% |
| May | -- | -24.16% | -30.16% | -1.19% | 25.73% | 0.50% | -5.86% |
| Jun | -- | -9.68% | -74.02% | -22.78% | -18.06% | 7.03% | -23.50% |
| Jul | -- | 0.00% | -10.49% | 80.00% | -23.91% | -38.72% | 1.38% |
| Aug | -- | 7.20% | -47.11% | -48.53% | -21.25% | -35.89% | -29.12% |
| Sep | -- | -22.22% | 5.89% | 83.62% | 31.60% | -11.91% | 17.40% |
| Oct | -1.77% | -58.72% | -15.32% | -35.10% | -23.66% | -20.63%* | -25.87% |
| Nov | -33.76% | -25.03% | -22.82% | -6.15% | -26.65% | -- | -22.88% |
| Dec | -8.09% | -25.13% | 29.56% | -22.93% | -4.61% | -- | -6.24% |
| Total | -40.20% | -91.34% | -91.95% | -74.82% | -73.06% | -77.14% | -74.75% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Click Frenzy-Pro™ for an AI analysis of this ticker.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
BBLG Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Moderate volatility - stock generally follows market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $33K | #6094 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BBLG Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
BBLG Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-09-30| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | Phillip Terry Meikle II | Director | Grant (A) | +113,896 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | Robert E. Gagnon | Director | Grant (A) | +113,896 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | Bruce Stroever | Director | Grant (A) | +113,896 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-09-30 | Siddhesh Rajendra Angle | Director | Grant (A) | +113,896 opt | — | EDGAR |
BBLG Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Sep 30, 2026Directors 4
- Bruce Stroever · since Sep 19, 2014
- Siddhesh Rajendra Angle · since Oct 15, 2021
- Robert E. Gagnon · since Jan 8, 2024
- Phillip Terry Meikle II · since Oct 16, 2024
Officers 2
- Jeff Frelick · Chief Executive Officer · listed since Feb 2022
- Deina H Walsh · Chief Financial Officer · since Nov 4, 2014
Changes in the last 10 years (15)
| Oct 16, 2024 | Phillip Terry Meikle II became a director |
| Jan 8, 2024 | Robert E. Gagnon became a director |
| Dec 27, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Erick Lucera from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 29, 2023 | Knight Insurance Company, Ltd first on file as a 10% owner |
| Feb 28, 2022 | Jeff Frelick listed as Chief Executive Officer (previously Chief Operating Officer) in SEC filings |
| Oct 15, 2021 | Siddhesh Rajendra Angle became a director |
| Oct 15, 2021 | Erick Lucera became a director |
| Mar 26, 2019 | Don Hankey Trust no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Jul 16, 2018 | Hankey Capital, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jul 16, 2018 | Don Hankey became a director |
| Jul 16, 2018 | Don Hankey became a 10% owner |
| Jul 16, 2018 | Don Hankey became Chairman of the Board |
| Jul 16, 2018 | Don Hankey Trust became a 10% owner |
| Dec 5, 2017 | Amir F Heshmatpour first listed as a 10% owner in an SEC filing |
| Jul 31, 2017 | Bret Hankey became a director |
Not reported recently (9)
- Don Hankey · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Sep 17, 2024
- Knight Insurance Company, Ltd · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 29, 2023
- Hankey Capital, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Oct 19, 2021
- Bret Hankey · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jan 17, 2020
- John J Booth · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 23, 2019
- Stephen R. La Neve · Last reported as CEO and President in an SEC filing dated Mar 20, 2018
- Jim Delshad · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Mar 20, 2018
- AFH Holding & Advisory, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Dec 5, 2017
- Amir F Heshmatpour · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Dec 5, 2017
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.