BBLGW Bone Biologics Corp Warrants
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- ORTHOPEDIC, PROSTHETIC & SURGICAL APPLIANCES & SUPPLIES (3842) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 2
- List Date
- 2021-10-13
- CIK
- 0001419554
- Headquarters
- Burlington, MA
- Homepage
- https://www.bonebiologics.com
Bone Biologics Corp a medical device company that is currently focused on bone regeneration in spinal fusion using the recombinant human protein known as NELL-1. NELL-1 in combination with DBM, demineralized bone matrix, is an osteopromotive recombinant protein that provides target specific control over bone regeneration. It is a clinical-stage entity. The production and marketing of its products and ongoing research and development activities are subject to extensive regulation by numerous governmental authorities in the United States.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is a comprehensive stock analysis report for BBLGW:
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Strong technical signals from RSI and Stochastic indicators, indicating a potential buy signal.
- Positive news sentiment from recent headlines, highlighting operational milestones and corporate outlook.
Primary Risks:
- Negative beta, indicating the stock moves opposite to market trends.
- High volatility levels, which could lead to significant price movements.
Investment Thesis: BBLGW presents an attractive buying opportunity, driven by strong technical signals and positive news sentiment. However, investors should be aware of the stock's negative beta and high volatility levels, which may impact their risk tolerance.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent headline highlighting operational milestones and corporate outlook has a positive impact on the stock price, supporting the bullish stance.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - Bullish, Medium-term (1-3 months) - Neutral, Long-term (3-12 months) - Bearish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Resistance: $16.55 (SMA 20), $17.96 (EMA 26)
- Support: $11.22 (Lower Bollinger Band), $12.45 (Current Price)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (38.90) - not overbought or oversold.
- MACD signal: Bearish - MACD histogram is below the zero line, indicating a bearish momentum signal.
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze - price is consolidating within the bands.
Volume Analysis:
- Volume trends: Bullish - volume has been increasing, supporting the current upmove.
- Institutional interest signals: Moderate - institutional investors are showing some interest in the stock.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The headline highlighting operational milestones and corporate outlook is positive, indicating a strong fundamental story.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate sentiment is positive (70%).
Catalyst Identification: No specific catalysts identified.
Market Narrative: The market narrative is aligned with the technical signals, as the recent news headlines support the bullish trend.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Negative beta (-4.23) indicates that the stock moves opposite to market trends.
Volatility Regime: High volatility levels (2.65) suggest that price movements could be significant.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels: $11.22 (Lower Bollinger Band), $12.45 (Current Price)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: BBLGW is outperforming the sector, indicating relative strength.
Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest signals suggest that investors are taking a closer look at the stock.
Correlation Analysis: R-squared interpretation: 0.42 - BBLGW has a moderate correlation with the market.
Relative Valuation: BBLGW is trading within its historical range, indicating a neutral position.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Resistance: $16.55 (SMA 20), $17.96 (EMA 26)
- Support: $11.22 (Lower Bollinger Band), $12.45 (Current Price)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Breakout level: $17.96 (EMA 26)
- Breakdown level: $11.22 (Lower Bollinger Band)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No specific catalysts identified.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels: $10.50 - a reasonable stop-loss level considering the volatility and risk profile.
I hope this comprehensive analysis meets your requirements!
BBLGW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $396K | #4748 of 6285 | -11.3% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
BBLGW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
BBLGW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-01-21| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | Jeff Frelick | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-21 | Deina H Walsh | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-06 | Robert E. Gagnon | Director | Grant (A) | +62,894 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-06 | Phillip Terry Meikle II | Director | Grant (A) | +62,894 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-06 | Siddhesh Rajendra Angle | Director | Grant (A) | +62,894 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-06 | Bruce Stroever | Director | Grant (A) | +62,894 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-21 | Jeff Frelick | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-21 | Deina H Walsh | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-10-18 | Phillip Terry Meikle II | Director | Grant (A) | +28,194 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-09-19 | Siddhesh Rajendra Angle | Director | Grant (A) | +30,713 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-09-19 | Robert E. Gagnon | Director | Grant (A) | +30,713 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-09-19 | Bruce Stroever | Director | Grant (A) | +30,713 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-01-19 | Deina H Walsh | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-01-19 | Jeff Frelick | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | — | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-01-10 | Robert E. Gagnon | Director | Grant (A) | +17 opt | — | EDGAR |
BBLGW Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $7.70| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeff Frelick | Chief Executive Officer | 360 | $2.8K | $11.6K | 7 | 2026-01-21 |
| 2 | Deina H Walsh | Chief Financial Officer | 313 | $2.4K | $10.1K | 7 | 2026-01-21 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.