Cerence Inc. Common Stock(CRNC)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$10.77
- 52-Week Range
- $5.85 – $13.74
- YTD
- -6.83%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 44.77
- Straddle Price
- $2.15
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.26
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.43% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.69 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 13.72% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 9.13% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +45.4pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.1% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.1B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -12.4% |
| Book / Price | 33.0% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 78.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 24.8% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.09 |
| Quality Score | 3/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $9.94 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $11.18 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 326.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $0.1B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: CDNS, CRM, CRWD, MSFT, NOW, ORCL, PLTR, SHOP, SNOW, SNPS
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$40.38
Current Price
$10.77
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $25.58 | 48% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 73.9× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $39.25 | 14% | median 40.6× · 9 peers |
| Peer P/B | $44.34 | 19% | median 12.5× · 10 peers |
| Peer P/S | $75.26 | 19% | median 10.8× · 10 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $9.94 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-06-19 · updated 2026-06-19 18:43:30.312000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE (7372)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.5B
Cerence Inc is a United States-based software company. It is involved in developing mobility-based solutions for drivers and their cars. The customers include all automobile original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, or their tier 1 suppliers. The company's revenue is generated by selling software licenses and cloud-connected services. Geographically, it derives a majority of its revenue from the United States and also has a presence in Other Americas; Germany; Other Europe, the Middle East, Africa; Japan, and Other Asia-Pacific.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +5.57% | 6 |
| Feb | -15.97% | 6 |
| Mar | -6.08% | 6 |
| Apr | -0.26% | 6 |
| May | -1.25% | 6 |
| Jun | -2.24% | 6 |
| Jul | -0.94% | 5 |
| Aug | -4.50% | 5 |
| Sep | -8.40% | 5 |
| Oct | -4.96% | 5 |
| Nov | +23.75% | 5 |
| Dec | +5.83% | 5 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $11.18
SMA 50: $9.94
SMA 200: $10.03
Current: $10.77
EMA 12: $10.71
EMA 26: $10.61
MACD: 0.0980 | Signal: -0.2030
BULLISH
ADX (14): 20.61
WEAK TREND
+DI: 24.94
−DI: 26.02
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 51.36
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 24.85
Stoch %D: 26.90
Williams %R: -63.23
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $13.23
BB Lower: $9.14
NEUTRAL
OBV: 351,462,881
Vol SMA 20: 1,289,385
Vol ROC: 294.93%
ATR: $0.93
True Range: $1.32
HV 20: 105.0%
HV 30: 93.9%
HV 60: 82.4%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-18T21:15:29.705000
Date Range: 2024-06-21T00:00:00 – 2026-06-18T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Earnings History
6 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 13.59% | 8.70% | 0.64x | Within |
| 2024-10-07 | After-Close | 17.15% | 2.37% | 0.14x | Within |
| 2024-11-21 | After-Close | 26.89% | 21.01% | 0.78x | Within |
| 2025-02-06 | After-Close | 25.55% | 5.11% | 0.20x | Within |
| 2025-05-07 | After-Close | 20.44% | 12.33% | 0.60x | Within |
| 2025-11-19 | After-Close | 14.12% | 18.82% | 1.33x | Exceeded |
| 2026-02-04 | After-Close | 23.21% | 31.16% | 1.34x | Exceeded |
| 2026-05-07 | After-Close | 20.87% | 8.44% | 0.40x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 44.77
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 139.3%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.15
- Straddle (7D)
- $0.38
- P/C Volume
- 0.26
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 2.99
- Correlation (SPY)
- 42.4%
- R²
- 0.18
- Ann. Volatility
- 87.7%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.4%
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 44,573,500 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
12 filers$7.16M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.74M | 24.35% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.24M | 17.38% | 2025-09-30 |
| 3 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $1.06M | 14.82% | 2025-09-30 |
| 4 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $772.98K | 10.80% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $452.43K | 6.32% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | PEAK6 LLC | $441.70K | 6.17% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $381.12K | 5.33% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $366.61K | 5.12% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $338.22K | 4.73% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $196.87K | 2.75% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | Walleye Capital LLC | $80.77K | 1.13% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | Walleye Trading LLC | $79.51K | 1.11% | 2026-03-31 |
12 filers$8.70M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cubist Systematic Strategies, LLC | $2.94M | 33.78% | 2025-09-30 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $1.29M | 14.82% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | Crawford Fund Management, LLC | $1.17M | 13.42% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $1.03M | 11.89% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $842.80K | 9.69% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $400.05K | 4.60% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $237.26K | 2.73% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Point72 Asset Management, L.P. | $187.41K | 2.15% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC | $184.25K | 2.12% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Walleye Trading LLC | $162.80K | 1.87% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $136.93K | 1.57% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $118.00K | 1.36% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-02-13
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-13 | Marcy S Klevorn | Director | Award (A) | +12,968 | $0.01 | $130 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | Marianne Budnik | Director | Award (A) | +12,968 | $0.01 | $130 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | Kristi Ann Matus | Director | Award (A) | +12,968 | $0.01 | $130 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | DOUGLAS LEE DAVIS | Director | Award (A) | +12,968 | $0.01 | $130 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-13 | Marion Harris | Director | Award (A) | +12,968 | $0.01 | $130 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Christian Mentz | EVP, Chief Revenue Officer | Award (A) | +131,694 | $12.35 | $1.63M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Brian M Krzanich | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +263,338 | $12.35 | $3.25M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Nils Schanz | EVP Product & Technology | Award (A) | +87,796 | $12.35 | $1.08M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Jennifer Salinas | EVP Chief Admin Officer | Award (A) | +131,694 | $12.35 | $1.63M | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-12 | Antonio Rodriquez | CFO | Award (A) | +131,694 | $12.35 | $1.63M | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-24 | Antonio Rodriquez | CFO | Award (A) | +166,821 | $10.35 | $1.73M | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-24 | Brian M Krzanich | Chief Executive Officer | Award (A) | +552,766 | $10.35 | $5.72M | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-24 | Jennifer Salinas | EVP Chief Admin Officer | Award (A) | +242,044 | $10.35 | $2.51M | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-24 | Nils Schanz | EVP Product & Technology | Award (A) | +49,905 | $10.35 | $516.5K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-24 | Christian Mentz | EVP, Chief Revenue Officer | Award (A) | +49,905 | $10.35 | $516.5K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
24 insiders · @ $10.77
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brian M Krzanich | Chief Executive Officer | 1,722,091 | $18.55M | -$1.51M | 4 | 2026-01-12 |
| 2 | Jennifer Salinas | EVP Chief Admin Officer | 720,027 | $7.75M | -$2.11M | 6 | 2026-01-12 |
| 3 | Antonio Rodriquez | CFO | 575,246 | $6.20M | -$489.2K | 4 | 2026-01-12 |
| 4 | Stefan Ortmanns | Chief Executive Officer | 511,597 | $5.51M | -$8.16M | 38 | 2024-06-26 |
| 5 | Nils Schanz | EVP Product & Technology | 342,682 | $3.69M | -$494.6K | 6 | 2026-01-12 |
| 6 | Christian Mentz | EVP, Chief Revenue Officer | 293,474 | $3.16M | -$446.8K | 6 | 2026-01-12 |
| 7 | Sanjay Dhawan | Chief Executive Officer | 288,187 | $3.10M | -$33.61M | 31 | 2021-12-07 |
| 8 | Iqbal Arshad | EVP, CTO | 238,685 | $2.57M | -$423.8K | 6 | 2024-01-09 |
| 9 | Prateek Kathpal | EVP, CTO | 210,718 | $2.27M | -$562.7K | 6 | 2023-01-26 |
| 10 | THOMAS L BEAUDOIN | Director | 173,966 | $1.87M | -$888.9K | 32 | 2025-02-04 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/B Ratio | 2.9 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.9 |
| TTM Revenue | $0.3B |
| TTM Net Income | $-0.0B |
| TTM EPS | $-0.45 |
| ROE | -12.4% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.09 |