EDBL Edible Garden AG Incorporated Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
EDBL
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 95
- List Date
- 2022-05-05
- CIK
- 0001809750
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- Headquarters
- Belvidere, NJ
- Homepage
- https://www.ediblegarden.com
Edible Garden AG Inc is a next-generation controlled environment agriculture farming company. It uses traditional agricultural growing techniques together with technology to grow fresh, organic food, sustainably and safely while improving traceability. The company uses the controlled environment of traditional greenhouse structures, such as glass greenhouses together with hydroponic and vertical greenhouses to sustainably grow organic herbs and lettuces. Company provides two principal product segments: (i) fresh produce, including cut herbs, hydroponic basil, potted herbs, and wheatgrass; and …
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 49.94% | -0.68% | -27.65% | -28.85% | -1.81% |
| Feb | -- | -71.03% | -11.74% | -27.56% | -33.71% | -36.01% |
| Mar | -- | -16.36% | -25.23% | -12.90% | -57.41% | -27.97% |
| Apr | -- | -21.59% | -21.70% | -28.30% | -51.40% | -30.75% |
| May | -35.29% | -12.60% | -66.12% | 82.63% | -46.42% | -15.56% |
| Jun | -27.93% | -18.06% | -22.29% | -22.42% | -18.10% | -21.76% |
| Jul | 12.71% | 3.87% | 5.51% | -7.20% | -68.14% | -10.65% |
| Aug | -34.23% | 3.20% | -13.64% | -23.54% | -35.96% | -20.83% |
| Sep | -21.25% | -62.62% | -75.16% | 0.56% | -23.23% | -36.34% |
| Oct | -8.05% | -20.97% | -39.16% | -14.05% | -32.77%* | -23.00% |
| Nov | -33.66% | -11.25% | 25.74% | -23.74% | -- | -10.73% |
| Dec | -38.02% | -3.19% | 100.06% | -50.96% | -- | 1.97% |
| Total | -89.71% | -94.45% | -95.32% | -89.36% | -99.55% | -93.68% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.01
SMA 50: $1.25
SMA 200: $52.90
Current: $0.80
EMA 12: $0.92
EMA 26: $1.08
MACD: -0.1613 | Signal: 0.0086
BEARISH
ADX (14): 22.88
WEAK TREND
+DI: 12.32
−DI: 35.72
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 16.35
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 12.86
Stoch %D: 14.01
Williams %R: -85.72
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.28
BB Lower: $0.74
NEUTRAL
OBV: -59,163,937
Vol SMA 20: 135,428
Vol ROC: -17.15%
ATR: $0.09
True Range: $0.10
HV 20: 53.2%
HV 30: 51.1%
HV 60: 59.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators point to a bearish momentum, but recent news headlines suggest positive sentiment
- Strong earnings potential and successful product launches could drive stock price higher
- High volatility increases risk, but also presents opportunities for traders
Primary Risks:
- Bearish MACD signal indicates potential sell signal
- Low RSI reading suggests oversold conditions, which could lead to a bounce
Investment Thesis:
EDBL's recent news headlines indicate a positive trajectory, driven by successful product launches and earnings potential. While technical indicators suggest caution, the company's fundamentals and growth prospects outweigh bearish signals.
Recent News Sentiment Impact:
The positive news sentiment has contributed to a bullish bias in the analysis, despite bearish technical indicators.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term: BEARISH (1-4 weeks)
- Medium-term: NEUTRAL (1-3 months)
- Long-term: BULLISH (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $5.48
- Upper Bollinger Band: $9.36
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Oversold (<30), but may bounce higher
- MACD signal: Bearish, indicating potential sell signal
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price near middle band)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
The last 10 news articles highlight successful product launches, earnings potential, and a strong balance sheet.
Sentiment Assessment:
Aggregate news sentiment is POSITIVE, driving a bullish bias in the analysis.
Catalyst Identification:
Upcoming earnings releases could drive stock price higher or lower, depending on performance.
Market Narrative:
The positive news headlines align with a growing market narrative, suggesting further upside potential.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation:
EDBL's beta of 2.09 indicates high risk relative to the market (beta >1.2 = high risk).
Volatility Regime:
Current volatility is high compared to historical levels.
Options Market Signals:
No options data available, but a high IV premium could indicate fear or uncertainty.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance:
EDBL's performance relative to the sector is MIXED (sector up 2%, EDBL down 10%).
Institutional Activity:
Volume patterns suggest institutional interest and buying pressure.
Correlation Analysis:
EDBL moves independently of market trends (R-squared interpretation).
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $5.48
- Upper Bollinger Band: $9.36
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $1.60 (potential support)
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Upcoming earnings releases (no specific dates available)
Risk Management:
Stop-loss levels should be set near SMA 20 ($5.48) and the lower Bollinger Band ($1.60). Position sizing considerations include a maximum risk of 3% for long positions.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data, and you should consult additional sources before making investment decisions.
Generated
News
All EDBL news →
EDBL Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 1.5717
Alpha: -614.20%
Correlation: 0.1560
R-Squared: 2.4%
Stock Volatility: 128.4%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
EDBL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
EDBL Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-09Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −537,670 | $0.10 | -$53.2K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-07 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +416,812 | $0.15 | $63.4K | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
EDBL Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $0.80
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | 7,162 | $5.7K | $10.2K | 2 | 2026-07-09 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
EDBL Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 26, 2026Directors 5
- James E. Kras · since May 4, 2022
- Mathew J. McConnell · since May 4, 2022
- Ryan L. Rogers · since May 4, 2022
- Pamela DonAroma · since Apr 4, 2023
- Michael Joseph Naidrich · since Dec 29, 2025
Officers 2
- James E. Kras · President and CEO · since May 4, 2022
- Jonathan L. Gutoski · Chief Financial Officer · since Aug 17, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (26)
| Aug 17, 2026 | Jonathan L. Gutoski became Chief Financial Officer |
| Jul 9, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 1, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 16, 2026 | Scott Wolinsky reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 16, 2026 | Maria Theresa Wolinsky reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| May 26, 2026 | Scott Wolinsky became a 10% owner |
| May 26, 2026 | Maria Theresa Wolinsky became a 10% owner |
| Dec 29, 2025 | Michael Joseph Naidrich became a director |
| May 3, 2024 | UBS Group AG reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 25, 2024 | UBS Group AG became a 10% owner |
| Jan 25, 2024 | Kostas Dafoulas became Interim CFO |
| Jan 24, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Michael C James from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jan 24, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Michael C James as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing |
| May 19, 2023 | James E. Kras no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Apr 4, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Deborah K. Pawlowski from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 4, 2023 | Pamela DonAroma became a director |
| Oct 14, 2022 | Deborah K. Pawlowski became a director |
| May 4, 2022 | Tracy A. Nazzaro became a director |
| May 4, 2022 | Ryan L. Rogers became a director |
| May 4, 2022 | Michael C James became a director |
| May 4, 2022 | Michael C James became a 10% owner |
| May 4, 2022 | Michael C James became Chief Financial Officer |
| May 4, 2022 | Mathew J. McConnell became a director |
| May 4, 2022 | James E. Kras became a director |
| May 4, 2022 | James E. Kras became a 10% owner |
| May 4, 2022 | James E. Kras became President and CEO |
Not reported recently (3)
- Kostas Dafoulas · Last reported as Interim CFO in an SEC filing dated Feb 1, 2024
- Michael C James · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Sep 16, 2022
- Tracy A. Nazzaro · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 9, 2022
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.