GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·17mo ago
GDC GD Culture Group Limited Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
GDC
—
—
Key stats
About
- Industry (SIC)
- WHOLESALE-METALS & MINERALS (NO PETROLEUM) (5050) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 5
- List Date
- 2015-12-29
- CIK
- 0001641398
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-02
- Headquarters
- Jersey City, NJ
- Homepage
- https://www.gdculturegroup.com
GD Culture Group Ltd operates and manages its business as a single segment and has one operating and reportable segment, the Virtual Content Production. The company has relentlessly been focusing on serving its customers and creating value for them through the continual innovation and optimization of its products and services. For the AI-driven digital human creation and customization sector, the Company uses AI algorithms and software to generate realistic 3D or 2D digital human models. AI algorithms and machine learning models are used to simulate human characteristics, such as facial expres…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 12.06% | -33.45% | -26.43% | -8.87% | -14.17% |
| Feb | -12.95% | 9.52% | 42.22% | -8.15% | 7.66% |
| Mar | -25.67% | -50.48% | 33.52% | -25.27% | -16.97% |
| Apr | -9.58% | -28.66% | 4.49% | 35.59% | 0.46% |
| May | -84.16% | 36.48% | 0.00% | -97.47% | -36.29% |
| Jun | -12.14% | 21.37% | 39.26% | -93.49% | -11.25% |
| Jul | -23.75% | 24.78% | 0.92% | -25.66% | -5.93% |
| Aug | -15.74% | 322.22% | 23.11% | -15.93% | 78.42% |
| Sep | 7.17% | -45.79% | 55.24% | -7.33% | 2.32% |
| Oct | 3.11% | -54.01% | -15.94% | -21.64%* | -22.12% |
| Nov | 16.91% | 75.17% | 15.25% | -- | 35.78% |
| Dec | -15.74% | -15.25% | 5.71% | -- | -8.43% |
| Total | -93.62% | -16.83% | 301.54% | -99.94% | 22.79% |
* Only 4 year(s) of data available.
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $1.27
SMA 50: $1.43
SMA 200: $382.47
Current: $1.05
EMA 12: $1.19
EMA 26: $1.40
MACD: -0.2090 | Signal: 0.0404
BEARISH
ADX (14): 15.28
RANGE
+DI: 20.93
−DI: 21.33
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 31.14
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 0.00
Stoch %D: 6.67
Williams %R: -100.00
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $1.47
BB Lower: $1.07
OVERSOLD
OBV: 31,700,854
Vol SMA 20: 165,979
Vol ROC: -44.84%
ATR: $0.17
True Range: $0.10
HV 20: 67.6%
HV 30: 83.7%
HV 60: 129.0%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
LLM Stock Analysis Report: GDC
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH (confidence level: 6/10)
Key drivers:
- Bearish momentum signals from MACD
- Overbought RSI indicating potential reversal
- High volatility and correlation with market (beta >1.2)
Primary risks:
- Potential correction or reversal due to overbought conditions
- Market sentiment and news may continue to drive price lower
Investment thesis: GDC is likely to experience a short-term correction or reversal due to bearish momentum signals, despite recent positive news.
Recent news sentiment impact: Positive news headlines have had little impact on the stock's price movement, suggesting that market sentiment is currently driven by technical factors.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks) - BEARISH, Medium-term (1-3 months) - NEUTRAL, Long-term (3-12 months) - BULLISH
Support/Resistance Levels: $1.79 (SMA 20), $2.22 (Upper BB)
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Overbought (>70) indicating potential sell signal
- MACD signal: Bearish momentum, suggesting continued price decline
- Bollinger Bands position: Overbought (price touching upper band)
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals indicate a lack of significant buying or selling pressure.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The last 10 news headlines have been neutral, with no significant impact on the stock's price movement. Recent positive news has not led to a meaningful increase in price.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL, with no clear bullish or bearish bias.
Catalyst Identification: None identified; recent news has had little impact on the stock's price movement.
Market Narrative: The market narrative suggests that GDC is not being driven by fundamental factors and is instead reacting to technical momentum signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk relative to market (beta >1.2), indicating increased volatility.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are above historical averages, suggesting a high-risk environment.
Options Market Signals: IV rank: N/A, put/call ratios: N/A, unusual activity: None identified.
Downside Protection: Support level at $1.79 (SMA 20) and risk management considerations suggest that stop-loss levels should be set accordingly.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: GDC is underperforming its sector peers.
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional buying or selling pressure has been identified.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with market is high (R-squared: 0.8), indicating that GDC's price movement is strongly influenced by broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, suggesting that the stock may be undervalued.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: $1.79 (SMA 20) and $2.22 (Upper BB)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified; no clear technical signals to indicate a significant move in price.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Earnings dates: None available; FDA approvals: None available
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $1.79 (SMA 20) and position sizing considerations should be made to manage risk.
Generated
News
All GDC news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·26mo ago
BenzingaT3·30mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·30mo ago
BenzingaT3·31mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·31mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·32mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·33mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·34mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·35mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 45
Page 1 of 5
GDC Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 3.0387
Alpha: -374.86%
Correlation: 0.1944
R-Squared: 3.8%
Stock Volatility: 199.2%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
GDC Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
GDC Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-29Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-29 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | +2,371,373 | $0.02 | $85.4K | EDGAR |
| 2023-03-16 | Wei Xu | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | +162,667 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
GDC Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $1.05
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | 6,898,144 | $7.24M | $85.4K | 1 | 2026-06-29 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
GDC Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jun 29, 2026Directors 2
- Shuaiheng Zhang · since Feb 9, 2023
- Xiao Jian Wang · since Apr 21, 2023
Changes in the last 10 years (40)
| Jun 29, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 24, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP became a 10% owner |
| Apr 26, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Shuang Zhang from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 21, 2023 | Zihao Zhao became CFO |
| Apr 21, 2023 | Xiao Jian Wang became a director |
| Apr 21, 2023 | Xiao Jian Wang became CEO |
| Apr 21, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Hongxiang Yu from the board in an SEC filing |
| Apr 21, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Hongxiang Yu as Vice President in an SEC filing |
| Feb 17, 2023 | Yi Zhong became a director |
| Feb 9, 2023 | Shuaiheng Zhang became a director |
| Feb 9, 2023 | Lu Cai became COO |
| Sep 29, 2022 | Shuang Zhang became vice president |
| Sep 29, 2022 | Shuang Zhang became a director |
| Sep 29, 2022 | Hongxiang Yu became a director |
| Sep 29, 2022 | Hongxiang Yu became a 10% owner |
| Sep 29, 2022 | Hongxiang Yu became Vice President |
| Feb 9, 2021 | Wei Xu first listed as President in an SEC filing |
| Nov 16, 2020 | Yajing Li became a director |
| Jan 24, 2020 | Wei Xu became a director |
| Jan 24, 2020 | Wei Xu became a 10% owner |
| Dec 4, 2019 | Yimin Jin first on file as a director |
| Dec 4, 2019 | Yimin Jin first on file as a 10% owner |
| Dec 4, 2019 | Yimin Jin first on file as Chief Executive Officer |
| Apr 24, 2019 | Qihai Wang became a director |
| Feb 8, 2018 | Qi Zhang no longer listed as a director in SEC filings |
| Feb 8, 2018 | Qi Zhang no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Feb 8, 2018 | Kurt Jetta reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Feb 8, 2018 | Arthur B Drogue reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Yaqing Hu became a director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Xiaoyan Shen became CFO and Secretary |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Xiaonian Zhang became a director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Xiaonian Zhang became President and Director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Wenting Zou became a director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Jiazhen Li became a director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Jiazhen Li became a 10% owner |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Jiazhen Li became Co-Chair |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Hui Zhu became a director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Chuanliu Ni became a director |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Chuanliu Ni became Co-Chair & CEO |
| Feb 6, 2018 | Chenchen Zhang became a director |
Not reported recently (20)
- Yi Zhong · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 20, 2024
- Lu Cai · Last reported as COO in an SEC filing dated Feb 14, 2024
- Zihao Zhao · Last reported as CFO in an SEC filing dated Feb 14, 2024
- Wei Xu · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 16, 2023
- Hongxiang Yu · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Feb 17, 2023
- Shuang Zhang · Last reported as vice president in an SEC filing dated Feb 14, 2023
- Yaqing Hu · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 31, 2021
- Yimin Jin · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 9, 2021
- Yajing Li · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 9, 2021
- Qihai Wang · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 9, 2021
- Zhong Hui Holding Ltd · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Mar 9, 2018
- Jiazhen Li · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 26, 2018
- Xiaoyan Shen · Last reported as CFO and Secretary in an SEC filing dated Feb 26, 2018
- Chuanliu Ni · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 26, 2018
- Wenting Zou · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2018
- Xiaonian Zhang · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2018
- Hui Zhu · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2018
- Chenchen Zhang · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Feb 13, 2018
- Peter Nathanial · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 13, 2017
- Timothy James Richerson · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 12, 2017
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
5 ETFs hold GDC
5 shown · $1.85K total exposure
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $1,813 | — | 2026-09-30 |
| 2 | ITWO ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | ProShares | 0.00% | $14 | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 3 | URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $12 | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 4 | UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | ProShares | 0.00% | $9 | — | 2026-10-26 |
| 5 | RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | Global X | 0.00% | $1 | — | 2026-10-26 |
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.