INLF INLIF LIMITED Class A Ordinary Shares
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT, NEC (3569) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 156
- List Date
- 2025-01-02
- CIK
- 0001991592
- Homepage
- https://www.yiwate88.com
INLIF Ltd, through its subsidiary, is engaged in the research, development, manufacturing, and sales of injection molding machine-dedicated manipulator arms. In addition, it offers installation and warranty services for manipulator arms, and accessories and raw materials for manipulator arms. Its portfolio includes injection molding machine-dedicated manipulator arms, including transverse single and double-axis manipulator arms, transverse and longitudinal multi-axis manipulator arms, and large bullhead multi-axis manipulator arms.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -3.37% | 193.03% | 94.83% |
| Feb | -58.48% | 0.19% | -29.14% |
| Mar | -16.09% | -22.98% | -19.54% |
| Apr | -25.60% | -30.25% | -27.93% |
| May | -4.88% | 19.12% | 7.12% |
| Jun | -0.85% | -98.40% | -49.62% |
| Jul | -4.39% | -35.21% | -19.80% |
| Aug | 5.50% | 7.24% | 6.37% |
| Sep | -37.49% | 1.24% | -18.12% |
| Oct | 10.33% | -95.57%* | -42.62% |
| Nov | -25.72% | -- | -25.72% |
| Dec | -15.28% | -- | -15.28% |
| Total | -89.66% | -99.91% | -94.78% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: INLF
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key Drivers: High volatility, negative news sentiment, technical breakdown
Primary Risks: High risk due to beta >1.5 and high volatility
Investment Thesis: Sell the stock, expecting further price decline based on bearish technical signals and lack of recent positive news.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news available, which contributes to the bearish assessment.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term: BEARISH (1-4 weeks), Medium-term: NEUTRAL (1-3 months), Long-term: BULLISH (3-12 months)
Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages and technical patterns: * SMA 20: $5.55 * SMA 50: $442.10 * SMA 200: $1289.05
Momentum Signals: * RSI interpretation: OVERSOLD (20.25), potential buy signal * MACD signal: BEARISH crossover * Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL, price touching lower band
Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals: * Volume SMA 20: 1705387.78 * On-Balance Volume (OBV): 7962599.79 * Volume Rate of Change: -61.93%
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL, no significant sentiment impact due to lack of recent news.
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming events or releases that could significantly impact the stock price.
Market Narrative: Technical signals are dominant, with bearish momentum and high volatility.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: High risk (beta >1.5) relative to market.
Volatility Regime: Current vs historical volatility levels: * Stock Volatility: 3.53 * Historical Volatility (HV20, HV30, HV60): 454.2%, 755.2%, and 557.4%
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels to monitor: * SMA 20: $5.55
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: INLF is a standalone stock, not part of a specific sector.
Institutional Activity: No recent institutional activity reported.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY: 0.06 (low correlation).
Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: NEUTRAL.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance to monitor: * SMA 20: $5.55 * SMA 50: $442.10 * SMA 200: $1289.05
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: * Bollinger Bands upper/lower band touch
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming events or releases.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations: * Set stop-loss below SMA 20: $4.23 * Consider reducing position size due to high volatility
This comprehensive analysis provides a detailed evaluation of the stock, highlighting technical signals, news sentiment, risk metrics, and market positioning.
INLF Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
INLF Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
INLF Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-02| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −3,691,666 | $0.03 | -$125.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-07-01 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | −912,003 | $0.06 | -$31.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-29 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Buy (P) | +4,420,814 | $0.04 | $188.9K | EDGAR |
INLF Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $0.18| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | 3,631 | $654 | $31.8K | 3 | 2026-07-02 |
INLF Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jul 2, 2026Directors 5
- Wenzao Huang · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yaner Zhang · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yongfu Zeng · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yongjun Zhou · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yunjun Huang · since Mar 18, 2026
Officers 2
- Rongjun Xu · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Yanting Chen · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (9)
| Jul 2, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 24, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP became a 10% owner |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yunjun Huang became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yongjun Zhou became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yongfu Zeng became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yanting Chen became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Yaner Zhang became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Wenzao Huang became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Rongjun Xu became Chief Executive Officer |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.