JAGX Jaguar Health, Inc.
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
JAGX
—
—
Key stats
Fair Value
+50.0% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.61 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.99% |
| WACC | 8.18% |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -10.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 10 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -792.4% |
| Book / Price | 537.7% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 82.3% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | -24.2% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.35 |
| Quality Score | 2/6 — normal (10y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $3.88 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $2.38 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 2591.7% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
Peers used for multiples: ABT, NVS, PFE
(SIC-code peers; ETF co-membership was sector-incoherent)
Blended Fair Value
$53.31
Deviation
+50.0%
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 39.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 19.2× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $44.73 | 16% | median 3.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | $277.33 | 16% | median 3.9× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $3.88 | 69% | stability 85% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-10-27 · updated
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 47
- List Date
- 2015-05-13
- CIK
- 0001585608
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, CA
- Homepage
- http://www.jaguar.health
Jaguar Health Inc is a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company developing novel proprietary prescription medicines sustainably derived from plants from rainforest areas for gastrointestinal disease states in humans and animals. The Company focuses on conditions associated with overactive bowel, including chronic debilitating diarrhea, urgency, and bowel incontinence. It operates through two segments: animal health, which develops and commercializes products for animals, and human health, with the human health segment generating the maximum revenue and focusing on products such as Mytesi, focus…
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 58.43% | -23.96% | -31.05% | -31.48% | -18.86% | -32.38% | -13.22% |
| Feb | -25.53% | -45.87% | -57.71% | -40.88% | -26.57% | 38.71% | -26.31% |
| Mar | -16.28% | 50.77% | -63.31% | 1.35% | -66.94% | -53.73% | -24.69% |
| Apr | -23.74% | -28.94% | -14.74% | 178.96% | 157.14% | -51.02% | 36.28% |
| May | 8.84% | -19.10% | 25.25% | -68.74% | -62.93% | -46.94% | -27.27% |
| Jun | -12.22% | -17.18% | -9.47% | -14.56% | -37.93% | -8.26% | -16.60% |
| Jul | -13.58% | -16.61% | 20.19% | -64.66% | -18.40% | -67.11% | -26.69% |
| Aug | -17.24% | -5.55% | -39.56% | -4.20% | -17.68% | -20.88% | -17.52% |
| Sep | -37.47% | -29.09% | -30.96% | 20.54% | 39.52% | -58.96% | -16.07% |
| Oct | -2.29% | -14.44% | 44.17% | -14.63% | -13.00% | 20.00%* | 3.30% |
| Nov | -38.50% | -6.48% | 1.84% | -1.89% | -27.03% | -- | -14.41% |
| Dec | -14.05% | -33.08% | -57.47% | -0.98% | -20.75% | -- | -25.27% |
| Total | -83.38% | -91.16% | -96.76% | -89.65% | -94.50% | -98.67% | -92.35% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $2.38
SMA 50: $3.88
SMA 200: $61.48
Current: $2.37
EMA 12: $2.45
EMA 26: $2.93
MACD: -0.4772 | Signal: 0.0980
BEARISH
ADX (14): 46.86
STRONG TREND
+DI: 46.07
−DI: 18.95
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 46.62
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 13.78
Stoch %D: 16.94
Williams %R: -78.37
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $3.12
BB Lower: $1.65
NEUTRAL
OBV: 178,533,477
Vol SMA 20: 5,966,665
Vol ROC: 137.85%
ATR: $0.99
True Range: $0.71
HV 20: 256.2%
HV 30: 892.9%
HV 60: 635.2%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Leverage MagnaExxon (JAGX) Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
- Overall assessment: BEARISH with confidence level 7/10
- Key drivers: Negative momentum signals, high volatility, and lack of recent news
- Primary risks: Potential breakdown below $1.13 support level and continued market pressure
- Recent news sentiment impact: No recent news available, but historical data suggests negative sentiment
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bearish, Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral, Long-term (3-12 months): Bullish
- Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages:
- SMA 20: $1.62 resistance
- SMA 50: $1.91 resistance
- SMA 200: $5.05 support
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 32.52 (neutral)
- MACD: -0.19 / Signal: -0.04 / Histogram: -0.15 (bearish)
- Bollinger Bands position: neutral
- Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals:
- Volume SMA 20: 120037.60, indicating moderate volume
- OBV: 2312446.72, suggesting increasing buying pressure
- Volume Rate of Change: 13.14%, indicating a slight increase in volume
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news available, but historical data suggests negative sentiment
- Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment: Negative (no recent news)
- Catalyst Identification: None identified based on available data
- Market Narrative: Lack of recent news and bearish momentum signals suggest a neutral market narrative
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: Beta: 1.69, indicating high risk relative to the market (beta >1.2 = high risk)
- Volatility Regime: Current volatility level: 1.20, higher than historical average
- Options Market Signals: No options data available
- Downside Protection: Support levels:
- SMA 200: $5.05
- Bollinger Bands lower band: $1.13
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Neutral (no recent news)
- Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggesting institutional interest: Moderate volume and increasing buying pressure
- Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY: 0.28, indicating a weak positive correlation
- Relative Valuation: Position within trading range: Below the 20-day SMA
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance to monitor:
- SMA 200: $5.05 support
- SMA 50: $1.91 resistance
- Bollinger Bands upper band: $2.11
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves:
- Breakdown below $1.13 support level
- Breakout above $1.62 resistance level
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: None identified based on available data
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations:
- Set stop-loss at $1.05 to limit potential losses
- Consider reducing position size due to high volatility
Generated
News
All JAGX news →
JAGX Options Activity & IV Rank
Volatility Metrics
Current IV: —
7-DTE IV: —
Expected Move: —
7-DTE Move: —
Days to Exp: — (Unknown)
Options Flow
Call Volume: —
Put Volume: —
P/C Volume: —
Call OI: —
Put OI: —
P/C OI: —
Total OI: —
ATM Options Pricing
ATM Call: —
ATM Put: —
Call %: —
Put %: —
Chain Summary
Chain Volume: 0
Chain OI: 0
Last Updated: 1/19/2024
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.4280
Alpha: 603.58%
Correlation: 0.0255
R-Squared: 0.1%
Stock Volatility: 1211.4%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
JAGX Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 386,143 (as of 2026-06-30)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
JAGX Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-03-12Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | John Micek | Director | Award (A) | +7,377 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-21 | Steven R. King | See Remarks | Award (A) | +11,740 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-21 | Lisa A Conte | See Remarks | Award (A) | +28,592 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-01-21 | Jonathan S. Wolin | See Remarks | Award (A) | +11,740 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-15 | Jonathan B. Siegel | Director | Award (A) | +7,377 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-15 | Anula Jayasuriya | Director | Award (A) | +5,870 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-15 | Carol R. Lizak | Chief Financial Officer | Award (A) | +11,740 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-15 | Pravin R Chaturvedi | Chief Scientific Officer | Award (A) | +11,740 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-15 | James J Bochnowski | Director | Award (A) | +6,363 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-26 | Steven R. King | See Remarks | Mixed | +7,489 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-26 | James J Bochnowski | Director | Mixed | +56,172 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-26 | Jonathan S. Wolin | See Remarks | Mixed | +18,724 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-26 | John Micek | Director | Mixed | +18,724 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-26 | Jonathan B. Siegel | Director | Mixed | +18,724 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-06-26 | Lisa A Conte | CEO and President | Mixed | +18,724 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
JAGX Insider Holdings
9 insiders · @ $2.37
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lisa A Conte | See Remarks | 56 | $133 | $21.7K | 23 | 2026-01-21 |
| 2 | Steven R. King | See Remarks | 23 | $55 | $0 | 22 | 2026-01-21 |
| 3 | Carol R. Lizak | Chief Financial Officer | 23 | $55 | $20.0K | 13 | 2025-12-15 |
| 4 | Jonathan S. Wolin | See Remarks | 23 | $55 | $10 | 15 | 2026-01-21 |
| 5 | Pravin R Chaturvedi | Chief Scientific Officer | 23 | $55 | $0 | 14 | 2025-12-15 |
| 6 | John Micek | Director | 14 | $33 | $0 | 13 | 2026-03-12 |
| 7 | Jonathan B. Siegel | Director | 14 | $33 | $59.1K | 16 | 2025-12-15 |
| 8 | James J Bochnowski | Director | 12 | $28 | $810.4K | 20 | 2025-12-15 |
| 9 | Anula Jayasuriya | Director | 11 | $26 | $0 | 4 | 2025-12-15 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
JAGX Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Mar 12, 2026Directors 4
- James J Bochnowski · since May 13, 2015
- Lisa A Conte · since May 13, 2015
- John Micek · since Apr 1, 2016
- Jonathan B. Siegel · since Mar 29, 2018
Officers 5
- Lisa A Conte · CEO and President · since May 13, 2015
- Carol R. Lizak · Chief Financial Officer · listed since Apr 2021
- Steven R. King · Chief of Sustainable Supply · listed since Apr 2021
- Pravin R Chaturvedi · Chief Scientific Officer · since Mar 1, 2022
- Jonathan S. Wolin · Chief of Staff, Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel · listed since Oct 2024
10% owners 1
- Lincoln Alternative Strategies LLC (entity) · since Aug 28, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (38)
| Aug 28, 2025 | Lincoln Alternative Strategies LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 10, 2024 | Jonathan S. Wolin listed as Chief of Staff, Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel (previously Chief of Staff, CCO & GC) in SEC filings |
| Jul 1, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Anula Jayasuriya from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 1, 2022 | Anula Jayasuriya became a director |
| Jun 30, 2022 | The company announced the departure of Gregory J Divis from the board in an SEC filing |
| Mar 1, 2022 | Pravin R Chaturvedi became Chief Scientific Officer |
| Apr 7, 2021 | Steven R. King listed as Chief of Sustainable Supply (previously Executive VP and Secretary) in SEC filings |
| Apr 7, 2021 | Carol R. Lizak listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously Chief Accounting Officer) in SEC filings |
| Feb 27, 2020 | Murray David MacNaughtan reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Feb 27, 2020 | Jeffery C. Johnson reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Sep 4, 2019 | Jonathan S. Wolin became Chief of Staff, CCO & GC |
| Aug 21, 2019 | Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 21, 2019 | Sagard Capital Partners Management Corp reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 21, 2019 | Sagard Capital Partners GP, Inc. reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Aug 13, 2019 | Carol R. Lizak became Chief Accounting Officer |
| Oct 24, 2018 | Nantucket Investments Ltd reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 24, 2018 | Burford Capital Ltd reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 12, 2018 | Bryan Ezralow reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 12, 2018 | Bryan Ezralow 1994 Trust dated December 22, 1994 reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Oct 2, 2018 | Bryan Ezralow became a 10% owner |
| Oct 2, 2018 | Bryan Ezralow 1994 Trust dated December 22, 1994 became a 10% owner |
| Sep 25, 2018 | Jonathan M Glaser reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 18, 2018 | Jonathan M Glaser became a 10% owner |
| Jun 18, 2018 | Murray David MacNaughtan became a director |
| Jun 14, 2018 | Gregory J Divis became a director |
| Jun 6, 2018 | Zhi Yang reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jun 6, 2018 | Zhi Yang reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jun 6, 2018 | Karen Steil Wright listed as CFO and Treasurer (previously Chief Financial Officer) in SEC filings |
| Jun 6, 2018 | Folkert W. Kamphuis reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Jun 6, 2018 | Ari Azhir reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Mar 29, 2018 | Jonathan B. Siegel became a director |
| Mar 23, 2018 | Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. became a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2018 | Sagard Capital Partners Management Corp became a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2018 | Sagard Capital Partners GP, Inc. became a 10% owner |
| Mar 23, 2018 | Jeffery C. Johnson became a director |
| Jul 31, 2017 | Nantucket Investments Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Jul 31, 2017 | Burford Capital Ltd became a 10% owner |
| Dec 15, 2016 | Ari Azhir became a director |
Not reported recently (3)
- Karen Steil Wright · Last reported as CFO and Treasurer in an SEC filing dated Jul 26, 2019
- Jiahao Qiu · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 6, 2018
- Roger J. Waltzman · Last reported as Chief Scientific Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 21, 2016
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Trailing P/E
—
TTM Diluted EPS
$-349.59
TTM Revenue
$27.82M
TTM Net Income
$-52.42M
TTM Op. Cash Flow
$-6.68M
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-06-30 | $1.23M | $-12.70M | $-15.70 | $-5.34M |
| Q1 '26 | 2026-03-31 | $20.27M | $-7.01M | $-13.60 | $8.83M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-12-31 | $3.23M | $-23.20M | $-149.94 | $-5.49M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-09-30 | $3.08M | $-9.50M | $-181.65 | $-4.69M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-06-30 | $2.98M | $-10.41M | $-358.94 | $-6.20M |
| Q1 '25 | 2025-03-31 | $2.21M | $-10.46M | $-584.45 | $-7.31M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-12-31 | $3.51M | $-9.92M | $-214.48 | $-7.83M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $3.11M | $-9.85M | $-760.45 | $-6.34M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-06-30 | $2.72M | $-9.49M | $-76.94 | $-8.17M |
| Q1 '24 | 2024-03-31 | $2.35M | $-9.23M | $-2520.00 | $-7.05M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-12-31 | $2.30M | $-9.17M | $18341.16 | $-7.45M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $2.81M | $-7.78M | $-16270.66 | $-6.79M |
Q2 2026 • period ending 2026-06-30 • filed 2026-08-19
Valuation
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
Price Multiples
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
Profitability & Yields
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
Balance Sheet
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
Reading the history chart
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
P/E
—
P/B
0.19
P/S
0.03
EV/EBITDA
—
EV/Sales
-0.04
ROE
-1065.2%
ROA
-153.3%
Div Yield
0.00%
FCF Yield
-730.47%
Debt/Equity
0.35
Current Ratio
—
Market Cap
$915.16K
as of 2026-10-26
Short Interest & Float
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
Metric definitions
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
How to read the signals
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
History chart
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Short Interest
84.16K
SI % of Float
1.17%
Days to Cover
1.00
Short Vol Ratio
59.2%
Free Float
7.20M
Float %
92.2%
Short interest 2026-09-30 • Short volume 2026-10-26 • Float 2026-09-15