MTR Mesa Royalty Trust

XNYS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

MTR — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
OIL ROYALTY TRADERS (6792) · industry map
Exchange
XNYS
Market Cap
$0.0B
List Date
1979-10-15
CIK
0000313364
Next Earnings
2026-11-12
Headquarters
Houston, TX
Homepage
https://mtr.q4web.com

Mesa Royalty Trust holds net overriding royalty interests in various oil and gas properties located in the: Hugoton field of Kansas, San Juan Basin field of New Mexico, and San Juan Basin Field of Colorado.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
'21'22'23'24'25'26Avg
Jan13.67%30.44%15.23%-18.71%14.05%20.28%12.49%
Feb7.46%0.29%-8.89%-1.85%-7.45%6.71%-0.62%
Mar-2.46%3.23%-5.79%-1.67%0.38%-5.96%-2.04%
Apr-6.12%34.53%8.95%-15.96%-16.03%-0.72%0.77%
May23.98%64.12%24.12%1.58%-4.94%-19.70%14.86%
Jun13.23%-48.51%3.14%2.56%6.01%-18.20%-6.96%
Jul-7.48%13.02%-20.62%-5.71%3.07%-5.25%-3.83%
Aug-5.70%37.51%-3.42%-23.43%-4.45%-21.60%-3.52%
Sep0.00%-19.41%-22.07%-10.77%-4.18%12.44%-7.33%
Oct12.37%11.95%-9.59%5.51%-9.79%-14.88%*-0.74%
Nov-11.21%6.52%25.66%22.90%1.28%--9.03%
Dec5.49%29.32%-26.67%-16.29%-10.56%---3.74%
Total44.19%196.53%-31.34%-51.97%-30.86%-44.04%13.75%
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $2.20
SMA 50: $2.40
SMA 200: $3.76
Current: $2.07
EMA 12: $2.08
EMA 26: $2.22
MACD: -0.1311 | Signal: -0.0083
BEARISH
ADX (14): 21.68
WEAK TREND
+DI: 21.96
−DI: 24.13

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 38.20
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 7.51
Stoch %D: 6.17
Williams %R: -77.48

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $2.58
BB Lower: $1.83
NEUTRAL
OBV: 2,242,903
Vol SMA 20: 7,181
Vol ROC: -55.14%
ATR: $0.14
True Range: $0.20
HV 20: 48.5%
HV 30: 40.5%
HV 60: 51.5%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-18T00:00:00 – 2026-10-21T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: MTR

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)

Key Drivers:

  • Oversold RSI reading indicating potential buy signal
  • Bearish MACD signal suggesting further decline possible
  • Strong Bollinger Bands squeezing, suggesting a breakout or mean reversion is likely

Primary Risks:

  • Continued downtrend due to bearish momentum indicators
  • Lack of catalysts for a near-term reversal
  • Negative beta suggesting the stock may move opposite the market

Investment Thesis: MTR appears oversold, but the bearish MACD signal and negative beta suggest caution. A potential rebound is possible if the stock can break above the upper Bollinger Band or technical resistance levels.

Recent News Sentiment Impact: NEUTRAL (no significant news headlines affecting the stock)

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): BEARISH, Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH, Long-term (3-12 months): NEUTRAL

Support/Resistance Levels:

  • Lower Bollinger Band: $3.61
  • Previous low: $3.53
  • Technical support: SMA 50 ($4.66)

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI: Oversold (28.01)
  • MACD: Bearish signal (-0.25 / -0.04 / -0.21)
  • Bollinger Bands: Squeezing, suggesting a breakout or mean reversion is likely

Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals:

  • Volume SMA 20: 7822.35
  • On-Balance Volume (OBV): 2478689.88
  • Volume Rate of Change: -67.42%

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: NEUTRAL (no significant news headlines affecting the stock)

Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL (news sentiment is mixed, with no clear impact on the stock's price movement)

Catalyst Identification: No near-term catalysts identified

Market Narrative: The market narrative is neutral, with no specific events or themes driving the stock's movement.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Risk Metrics:

  • Beta: -0.43 (vs SPY)
  • Alpha: 0.09
  • Correlation: -0.07
  • Stock Volatility: 0.71

Interpretation: Negative beta suggests the stock may move opposite the market.

Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels.

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: MTR's sector (Communication Services) has been performing relatively well, but this has not translated to a significant increase in the stock price.

Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is low, with no clear signals of accumulation or distribution.

Correlation Analysis: The stock moves opposite to the market (negative beta), suggesting it may be an attractive option for traders looking to hedge their portfolios.

Relative Valuation: MTR's relative valuation is neutral, with no significant deviation from its peers or sector averages.

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels: Support at $3.61 and resistance at SMA 50 ($4.66)

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical breakdown below the lower Bollinger Band ($3.61) would be a negative signal, while a breakout above the upper Bollinger Band or technical resistance levels could trigger a rebound.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No near-term catalysts identified

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set around $3.50 to mitigate potential losses in case of further decline. Position sizing considerations should focus on the stock's volatility and beta.

Please note that this analysis is for demonstration purposes only and should not be used as actual investment advice.

Generated

MTR Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis

Risk Metrics

Beta: -0.3688
Alpha: -69.01%
Correlation: -0.1032
R-Squared: 1.1%
Stock Volatility: 45.7%
Market Volatility: 12.8%

Analysis Details

Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 250
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Notable investors who own MTR
1 of 37 tracked investors
InvestorValueShare of their portfolioRankQ/Q sharesSource
Citadel Hedge fund
Ken Griffin
$46K
0.00%
#6018 of 6285+21.5%13F

Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions

MTR Institutional Ownership (13F)

Latest filings — 2026-06-30

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

14 filers311,890 shares$979.62K value
# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
1 Ashton Thomas Private Wealth, LLC 234,323 $726.42K 74.15% — 2026-06-30
2 Welch Group, LLC 22,570 $69.97K 7.14% — 2026-06-30
3 Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian 14,789 $45.85K 4.68% — 2026-06-30
4 McGowan Group Asset Management, Inc. 13,115 $40.66K 4.15% — 2026-06-30
5 CWM, LLC Custodian 7,196 $34.97K 3.57% — 2026-03-31
6 OSAIC HOLDINGS, INC. Custodian 9,855 $30.55K 3.12% — 2026-06-30
7 Morgan Stanley Custodian 3,941 $12.22K 1.25% — 2026-06-30
8 US BANCORP \DE\ Custodian 3,341 $10.36K 1.06% — 2026-06-30
9 JPMorgan Chase & Co Custodian 1,300 $4.09K 0.42% — 2026-06-30
10 UBS Group AG Custodian 550 $1.71K 0.17% — 2026-06-30
11 BNP Paribas Financial Markets Custodian 460 $1.43K 0.15% — 2026-06-30
12 CHILTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC 331 $1.03K 0.10% — 2026-06-30
13 HARBOUR INVESTMENTS, INC. 118 $365 0.04% — 2026-06-30
14 Wells Fargo & Company Custodian 1 $2 <0.01% — 2026-06-30
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
ETF Holders
1 ETF hold MTR
1 shown · $1.03M total exposure
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
1 BAB Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF Invesco 0.12% $1.0M — 2026-10-20
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.