NEOVW NeoVolta Inc. Warrant
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (3690) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Employees
- 41
- List Date
- 2022-06-17
- CIK
- 0001748137
- Headquarters
- Poway, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.neovolta.com
NeoVolta Inc is engaged in designing, manufacturing, and selling high-end Energy Storage System which can store and use solar energy via batteries and an inverter at a residential site. Its marketplace includes the solar industry, installers, new construction homebuilders, home remodelers, and homeowners. Its ESS product portfolio includes the NV14, NV24, NVPlus, NV7600 stand-alone inverter, and the NV16 kW AC hybrid inverter with 24 kW PV input and a 250 kW / 430 kWh C&I system.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -6.99% | -7.05% | -21.00% | 54.55% | 4.88% |
| Feb | -- | -2.60% | -27.01% | 3.33% | -36.00% | -15.57% |
| Mar | -- | -5.26% | -9.13% | -28.99% | 28.81% | -3.64% |
| Apr | -- | 7.93% | 88.53% | 64.95% | -27.21% | 33.55% |
| May | -- | 125.11% | 28.57% | -6.67% | -18.01% | 32.25% |
| Jun | -- | -3.51% | 58.67% | 0.71% | 33.96% | 22.46% |
| Jul | 10.63% | -32.96% | 6.21% | 31.94% | -34.99% | -3.83% |
| Aug | 25.00% | -16.23% | 3.03% | -25.79% | 0.00% | -2.80% |
| Sep | -3.89% | -3.08% | 39.71% | 75.44% | -34.29% | 14.78% |
| Oct | -14.12% | -14.66% | -13.25% | -39.52% | -47.15%* | -25.74% |
| Nov | -14.48% | -20.36% | 242.29% | 12.90% | -- | 55.09% |
| Dec | -25.42% | -18.67% | -15.25% | -29.33% | -- | -22.17% |
| Total | -27.20% | -39.46% | 812.24% | -25.50% | -77.00% | 128.61% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: NEOVW
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key Drivers:
- Strong technical momentum, with MACD indicating bullish signals
- Recent news headlines suggest positive sentiment around company developments and partnerships
Primary Risks:
- High volatility relative to market (beta >1.2)
- Lack of earnings data and options activity may limit potential upside
Investment Thesis: NeoVolta's recent technical momentum and positive news sentiment make it an attractive investment opportunity, but high volatility and limited earnings data create uncertainty.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The majority of recent headlines are positive, suggesting a supportive environment for the stock. However, one negative headline may be indicative of market jitters or concerns around specific company developments.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Short-term bullish, Medium-term neutral, Long-term bearish
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.18 (support)
- EMA 12: $1.22 (resistance)
- Upper Bollinger Band: $1.45 (resistance)
Momentum Signals: RSI interpretation: Neutral (57.60) MACD signal: Bullish Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 1531.15 (neutral)
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 301374.00 (bullish)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The company has announced several positive developments, including partnerships and earnings releases, which have contributed to a strong technical momentum.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive
Catalyst Identification:
- Upcoming earnings release (TBD)
- Product launches and strategic commercial capabilities expansions
Market Narrative: Technical signals are largely bullish, with recent news headlines supporting the stock's upward trend. However, the lack of earnings data and options activity may create uncertainty around potential catalysts.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: High volatility - stock moves more than market (beta >1.2)
Volatility Regime:
- Current vs historical volatility levels: Higher
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection:
- Support levels: SMA 20 ($1.18) and EMA 12 ($1.22)
- Risk management considerations: Position sizing, stop-loss levels
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: NeoVolta's sector performance is neutral, with mixed signals from other stocks.
Institutional Activity: No notable institutional activity detected.
Correlation Analysis:
- Correlation to market (R-squared interpretation): Low correlation
Relative Valuation: The stock is positioned within a trading range, with recent price action indicating a possible breakout or breakdown.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- SMA 20: $1.18 (support)
- EMA 12: $1.22 (resistance)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $1.45 (resistance)
- Lower Bollinger Band: $0.91 (support)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts:
- Upcoming earnings release (TBD)
- Product launches and strategic commercial capabilities expansions
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels: $1.18 (SMA 20) and $1.22 (EMA 12), position sizing considerations.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data, and actual market conditions may differ.
NEOVW Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 208
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
NEOVW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $94.81K | 73.06% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $34.97K | 26.94% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $140.49K | 69.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $62.37K | 30.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $315 | 0.15% | 2026-06-30 |
NEOVW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-06-12| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-12 | John A Hass | Director | Buy (P) | +25,000 | $1.92 | $48.0K | EDGAR |
| 2026-06-02 | Steve Bond | Executive Vice President | Buy (P) | +43,000 | $1.99 | $85.6K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-20 | Steve Bond | Executive Vice President | Buy (P) | +47,000 | $2.09 | $98.1K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-19 | Jing Nealis | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +1,025,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-23 | Amany Ibrahim | Chief Operating Officer | Exer (M) | +37,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-03-23 | Thomas Enzendorfer | Chief Technology Officer | Exer (M) | +37,500 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-25 | Henry Ardes Johnson | CEO & President | Mixed | +600,166 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-02-25 | Steve Bond | Chief Financial Officer | Mixed | +112,531 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-05 | Thomas Enzendorfer | Chief Technology Officer | Grant (A) | +450,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-05 | Amany Ibrahim | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +450,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-10 | Brent Willson | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −500,000 | $0.01 | -$5.0K | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-07 | Steve Bond | Chief Financial Officer | Grant (A) | +240,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-01-15 | Michael Mendik | Chief Operating Officer | Grant (A) | +150,000 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-10-22 | James F Amos | Director | Award (A) | +36,609 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-10-22 | John A Hass | Director | Award (A) | +36,609 | — | EDGAR |
NEOVW Insider Holdings
5 insiders · @ $0.65| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brent Willson | Chief Executive Officer | 3,600,000 | $2.34M | -$5.0K | 2 | 2025-10-10 |
| 2 | Steve Bond | Executive Vice President | 840,000 | $546.0K | $183.8K | 5 | 2026-06-02 |
| 3 | John A Hass | Director | 101,190 | $65.8K | $48.0K | 3 | 2026-06-12 |
| 4 | Thomas Enzendorfer | Chief Technology Officer | 37,500 | $24.4K | $0 | 2 | 2026-03-23 |
| 5 | Amany Ibrahim | Chief Operating Officer | 37,500 | $24.4K | $0 | 2 | 2026-03-23 |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.