PLSM Pulsenmore Ltd. Ordinary Shares
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS (3841) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 63
- List Date
- 2022-06-10
- CIK
- 0002064764
- Homepage
- https://www.pulsenmore.com
Pulsenmore Ltd is an emerging medical device company engaged in the research, development, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of non-invasive portable ultrasound solutions for home use. Its products include the Pulsenmore ES and Pulsenmore FC, along with the early-stage Pulsenmore MC, collectively referred to as Pulsenmore Products, enabling remote ultrasound scans in gynecology and other fields such as pulmonary, cardiology, and urology through telemedicine. The Company operates in a single segment focused on developing and commercializing portable ultrasound technologies, with Israel contrib…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -20.52% | -20.52% |
| Feb | -27.73% | -27.73% |
| Mar | -12.93% | -12.93% |
| Apr | -4.51% | -4.51% |
| May | 38.81% | 38.81% |
| Jun | 9.94% | 9.94% |
| Jul | -26.85% | -26.85% |
| Aug | -25.78% | -25.78% |
| Sep | -13.28% | -13.28% |
| Oct | -20.46%* | -20.46% |
| Nov | -- | -- |
| Dec | -- | -- |
| Total | -72.71% | -72.71% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: PLSM
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical signals indicate a range-bound market with no clear trend direction.
- Recent news headlines highlight positive developments, but the impact is somewhat muted by the overall neutral sentiment.
- Risk metrics suggest low volatility, which may not provide significant upside potential.
Investment Thesis: PLSM presents a mixed bag, with both technical and fundamental factors at play. While recent news has been generally positive, the stock's movement is currently trapped in a range, making it challenging to initiate new positions or aggressively manage risk.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: NEUTRAL (Short-term: Range-bound; Medium-term: Neutral; Long-term: Bullish)
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower support: $2.35
- Middle resistance: $2.75
- Upper resistance: $3.15
Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (38.08)
- MACD signal: Bearish (-0.25 / -0.26)
- Bollinger Bands position: Neutral (price touching middle band)
Volume Analysis: Volume trends indicate a lack of significant institutional interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive developments, including commercial engagements and financial results announcements.
Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE (Aggregate sentiment from recent headlines)
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings announcements may provide more clarity on the company's direction.
Market Narrative: The positive news has not generated a strong enough catalyst to break the stock out of its current range, which is still dominated by technical signals.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Low risk relative to market (beta: 0.28)
Volatility Regime: Low volatility - stock moves less than market
Options Market Signals: No options data available
Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations:
- Critical price level: $2.35
- Breakout/breakdown level: $2.75
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: PLSM's sector is performing relatively strong, which could contribute to its neutral sentiment.
Institutional Activity: No significant institutional interest signals are present in the options market or volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: PLSM has a low correlation with the broader market (R-squared: 0.03).
Relative Valuation: The stock is trading within its historical range, suggesting no clear value proposition.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Lower support: $2.35
- Middle resistance: $2.75
- Upper resistance: $3.15
Breakout/Breakdown Levels:
- Short-term: $2.45 (breakout) or $2.20 (breakdown)
- Medium-term: $2.95 (breakout) or $2.55 (breakdown)
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings announcements.
Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels at critical price levels, with a focus on managing risk rather than aggressively trading the stock.
This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of PLSM's current situation, highlighting both technical and fundamental factors that may influence its future performance. While recent news has been positive, the stock remains trapped in a range, making it challenging to initiate new positions or aggressively manage risk.
PLSM Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 185
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
PLSM Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
PLSM Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-10-21| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | David Woods | Chief Commercial Officer | Grant (A) | +6,886 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-10-14 | Racheli Guz-Lavi | Director | Exer (M) | +46,874 | $0.03 | $1.5K | EDGAR |
PLSM Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $1.73| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Racheli Guz-Lavi | Director | 46,874 | $81.1K | $0 | 1 | 2026-10-14 |
PLSM Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 21, 2026Directors 6
- Anat Loewenstein · since Mar 18, 2026
- Elazar Sonnenschein · since Mar 18, 2026
- Hagai Itkin · since Mar 18, 2026
- Jonathan Adereth · since Mar 18, 2026
- Linda Messalem · since Mar 18, 2026
- Racheli Guz-Lavi · since Mar 18, 2026
Officers 6
- Elazar Sonnenschein · Chief Executive Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- Eran Hirsh · Chief Financial Officer · since Mar 18, 2026
- David Woods · Chief Commercial Officer · since Oct 6, 2026
- Michael Hamelsdorf · GC & Corporate Secretary · since Mar 18, 2026
- Meir Shmouely · VP Software Development · since Mar 18, 2026
- Minelu Sonnenschein · VP R&D · since Mar 18, 2026
Changes in the last 10 years (12)
| Oct 6, 2026 | David Woods became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Racheli Guz-Lavi became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Minelu Sonnenschein became VP R&D |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Michael Hamelsdorf became GC & Corporate Secretary |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Meir Shmouely became VP Software Development |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Linda Messalem became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Jonathan Adereth became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Hagai Itkin became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Eran Hirsh became Chief Financial Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Elazar Sonnenschein became a director |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Elazar Sonnenschein became Chief Executive Officer |
| Mar 18, 2026 | Anat Loewenstein became a director |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.