Toast, Inc.(TOST)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $22.26 – $40.95
- YTD
- -12.40%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 16.59
- Straddle Price
- $2.96
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.92
- Market Cap
- $17.2B
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.94% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.46 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 12.97% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 12.71% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +19.6pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +16.8% |
| DCF Horizon | 12 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.10 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.6B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 23.8% |
| Book / Price | 11.4% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.7% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 8.5% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 4/6 — high quality (12y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +21.0% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $32.96 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $33.33 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 76.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-1.0B |
| Market Cap | $18B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $23.73 | 30% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | $24.00 | 14% | median 27.6× · 8 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $27.05 | 14% | median 25.8× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/B | $36.21 | 3% | median 10.7× · 8 peers |
| Peer P/S | $146.14 | 9% | median 11.8× · 8 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $32.96 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $30.15 | 30% | 23 strikes · skew +0.12 |
- Industry (SIC)
- SERVICES-COMPUTER PROCESSING & DATA PREPARATION (7374)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $17.2B
Toast Inc is a cloud-based, all-in-one digital technology platform purpose-built for the restaurant community. The company provides a comprehensive platform of software-as-a-service (SaaS) products and financial technology solutions, including integrated payment processing, restaurant-grade hardware, and a broad ecosystem of third-party partners. It serves as a restaurant operating system, connecting front of house and back of house operations across service models such as dine-in, takeout, and delivery. It operates through one reportable segment consisting of its SaaS products, financial tech…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | -1.32% | 5 |
| Feb | -4.45% | 5 |
| Mar | -0.12% | 5 |
| Apr | -0.12% | 5 |
| May | +3.55% | 5 |
| Jun | +1.40% | 5 |
| Jul | +11.07% | 5 |
| Aug | +5.43% | 5 |
| Sep | -9.77% | 6 |
| Oct | +4.54% | 5 |
| Nov | -3.51% | 5 |
| Dec | +2.19% | 5 |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary BULLISH (Confidence Level: 7/10)
Key drivers:
- Strong technical signals, including bullish MACD and ADX
- Positive news sentiment, with majority of recent headlines highlighting company's growth story
- Catalysts:
- Upcoming earnings release (no specific date available)
- Product launch rumors
Primary risks:
- High volatility, potentially amplifying stock moves
- Options market shows neutral sentiment, but IV premium is relatively high
Investment thesis: TOST presents a moderate-risk opportunity with potential for upside, driven by its strong technical momentum and positive news sentiment.
Recent news sentiment impact: Recent headlines have been overwhelmingly positive, contributing to the bullish sentiment in our analysis.
Technical Analysis
- Trend Direction: Short-term (1-4 weeks): Bullish; Medium-term (1-3 months): Bullish; Long-term (3-12 months): Neutral
- Support/Resistance Levels:
- Lower Bollinger Band: $32.57
- Middle Line: $34.98
- Upper Bollinger Band: $37.38
- Momentum Signals:
- RSI interpretation: Neutral (56.96)
- MACD signal: Bullish (1.43 / Signal: -0.10 / Histogram: 1.54)
- Bollinger Bands position: Squeeze
News & Sentiment Analysis
- Recent Headlines Summary: Majority of recent headlines highlight company's growth story, including earnings beats and product launch rumors.
- Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is positive (60%).
- Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings release (no specific date available), potential product launches
- Market Narrative: News aligns with technical signals, driving bullish momentum.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
- Beta Interpretation: Risk relative to market (beta 1.06) is above average.
- Volatility Regime: Current volatility is higher than historical levels.
- Options Market Signals: IV rank: 17.1% (Low); Put/Call volume ratio: 0.83 (Neutral sentiment)
- Downside Protection: Support levels: $32.57 (Lower Bollinger Band), $34.98 (Middle Line)
Market Context & Positioning
- Sector Performance: Relative strength vs sector/market: Strong (60%).
- Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest institutional interest.
- Correlation Analysis: Stock moves relatively strongly with the market (R-squared interpretation).
- Relative Valuation: Position within trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels: Support/resistance: $32.57, $34.98, $37.38
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: Technical levels that could trigger significant moves: $35.55 (EMA 12), $36.23 (EMA 26)
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings release (no specific date available), potential product launches.
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations.
By analyzing the data, we conclude that TOST presents a moderate-risk opportunity with potential for upside, driven by its strong technical momentum and positive news sentiment. However, high volatility and options market shows neutral sentiment are risks to consider.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | After-Close | 26.14% | 14.72% | 0.56x | Within |
| 2025-02-19 | Pre-Market | 12.98% | 6.84% | 0.53x | Within |
| 2025-05-08 | After-Close | 10.69% | 10.85% | 1.01x | Exceeded |
| 2025-08-05 | After-Close | 10.21% | 6.03% | 0.59x | Within |
| 2025-11-04 | After-Close | 12.32% | 4.90% | 0.40x | Within |
| 2026-02-12 | After-Close | 12.63% | 3.70% | 0.29x | Within |
| 2026-05-07 | After-Close | 9.76% | 10.16% | 1.04x | Exceeded |
| 2026-08-04 | After-Close | 10.84% | 2.93% | 0.27x | Within |
- IV Rank (30D)
- 16.59
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 55.6%
- Straddle (30D)
- $2.96
- Straddle (7D)
- $1.12
- P/C Volume
- 0.92
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.06
- Correlation (SPY)
- 29.6%
- R²
- 0.09
- Ann. Volatility
- 46.8%
- SPY Volatility
- 13.0%
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $148.71M | 28.56% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $123.42M | 23.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Freemont Management S.A. | $37.56M | 7.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Walleye Trading LLC | $32.82M | 6.30% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN Custodian | $31.81M | 6.11% | 2026-03-31 |
| 6 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $31.36M | 6.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $26.15M | 5.02% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $14.38M | 2.76% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $14.36M | 2.76% | 2025-09-30 |
| 10 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $9.93M | 1.91% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $8.87M | 1.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | TUDOR INVESTMENT CORP ET AL | $7.64M | 1.47% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Caption Management, LLC | $6.33M | 1.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $6.13M | 1.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $3.48M | 0.67% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $3.28M | 0.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | PEAK6 LLC | $3.05M | 0.59% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $1.77M | 0.34% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.40M | 0.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $1.39M | 0.27% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $1.16M | 0.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | SIG BROKERAGE, LP | $1.11M | 0.21% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $957.01K | 0.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP Custodian | $845.73K | 0.16% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $756.70K | 0.15% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC Custodian | $120.82M | 30.57% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $69.55M | 17.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $48.12M | 12.18% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN Custodian | $39.77M | 10.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $19.78M | 5.01% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $17.53M | 4.44% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Optiver Holding B.V. | $17.30M | 4.38% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $10.00M | 2.53% | 2025-09-30 |
| 9 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $9.98M | 2.53% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | SIMPLEX TRADING, LLC Custodian | $8.92M | 2.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 11 | Walleye Trading LLC | $7.31M | 1.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 12 | Parallax Volatility Advisers, L.P. | $4.52M | 1.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 13 | Twin Tree Management, LP | $4.35M | 1.10% | 2026-06-30 |
| 14 | Limestone Investment Advisors LP | $2.78M | 0.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 15 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $2.14M | 0.54% | 2026-06-30 |
| 16 | Caption Management, LLC | $1.88M | 0.48% | 2026-06-30 |
| 17 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.82M | 0.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 18 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $1.53M | 0.39% | 2026-06-30 |
| 19 | BALYASNY ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P. | $1.24M | 0.31% | 2026-06-30 |
| 20 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $1.15M | 0.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 21 | Qube Research & Technologies Ltd | $929.19K | 0.24% | 2026-06-30 |
| 22 | Squarepoint Ops LLC | $859.64K | 0.22% | 2026-06-30 |
| 23 | TWO SIGMA INVESTMENTS, LP Custodian | $756.70K | 0.19% | 2026-06-30 |
| 24 | CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A. | $556.40K | 0.14% | 2026-06-30 |
| 25 | Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | $417.30K | 0.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-04 | Jonathan Vassil | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | — | $18.05 | -$452.5K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-25 | Jonathan Vassil | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | — | $26.85 | -$1.62M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-21 | Jonathan Vassil | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | — | $26.68 | -$259.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-13 | Jonathan Vassil | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | — | $26.68 | -$257.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | Elena Gomez | President, CFO | Sell (S) | −7,924 | $35.30 | -$279.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | Aman Narang | CEO | Sell (S) | −161,948 | $35.31 | -$5.72M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Aman Narang | CEO | Sell (S) | −138,052 | $35.27 | -$4.87M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Jonathan Vassil | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | — | $26.69 | -$87.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Elena Gomez | President, CFO | Sell (S) | −17,076 | $35.28 | -$602.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Jonathan Vassil | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | — | $26.69 | -$87.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Aman Narang | CEO | Sell (S) | −138,052 | $35.27 | -$4.87M | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Elena Gomez | President, CFO | Sell (S) | −17,076 | $35.28 | -$602.4K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-05 | Rossana Niola | Principal Accounting Officer | Sell (S) | −2,298 | $33.45 | -$76.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-04 | Rossana Niola | Principal Accounting Officer | Exer (M) | +6,604 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-08-04 | Jonathan Vassil | Chief Revenue Officer | Mixed | — | $17.55 | -$438.1K | EDGAR |
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Technology Investment Dining Group, LLC | 10%+ Owner | 37,843,646 | $1.13B | -$298.27M | 5 | 2023-07-25 |
| 2 | HMI Capital Partners, L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 10,657,887 | $317.61M | $28.61M | 1 | 2022-01-31 |
| 3 | Steve Papa | 10%+ Owner | 8,618,317 | $256.83M | -$158.82M | 6 | 2022-06-27 |
| 4 | Deer IX & Co. L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 4,576,879 | $136.39M | -$726.01M | 1 | 2022-11-25 |
| 5 | Jonathan Grimm | Chief Technology Officer | 3,091,542 | $92.13M | -$64.4K | 5 | 2022-05-05 |
| 6 | Stephen Fredette | President | 1,003,088 | $29.89M | -$108.67M | 87 | 2026-07-06 |
| 7 | TCV X (B), L.P. | 625,000 | $18.62M | $150.00M | 1 | 2021-10-29 | |
| 8 | Richard Kent Bennett | Director | 539,423 | $16.07M | -$13.26M | 30 | 2026-06-16 |
| 9 | Bessemer Venture Partners IX Institutional L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 500,000 | $14.90M | -$276.14M | 2 | 2023-05-22 |
| 10 | Bessemer Venture Partners IX L.P. | 10%+ Owner | 390,856 | $11.65M | -$389.74M | 3 | 2023-12-19 |
What is Form 144? A notice of intent to sell restricted or control stock under Rule 144. Affiliates (officers, directors, 10%+ owners) and holders of restricted shares must file Form 144 when planning to sell more than 5,000 shares or $50,000 in any 3-month rolling window.
How it relates to Form 4: Form 144 is filed before the trade (up to 90 days in advance); Form 4 is filed within 2 business days after the trade executes. Not every Form 144 results in a sale — the filer may cancel or delay. Look for the corresponding Form 4 on the Insider Activity card to confirm a sale actually happened.
10b5-1 plans: Trades made under a pre-scheduled Rule 10b5-1 plan are not discretionary — they execute automatically on dates set months earlier, regardless of news. High 10b5-1 percentages mean less per-filing signal value, though cumulative selling volume still matters.
"Notice value": Aggregate market value the filer wrote into the Form 144 — i.e. the size of the planned sale, not necessarily the executed dollars. Amendments (Form 144/A) and post-cancellation refilings can inflate this if you sum naively; the rollup above excludes filings with zero stated value.
Source & freshness: Sourced from public Form 144 filings. Refreshed daily; new filings typically appear here the morning after they are filed.
| Filed | Filer | Role | Shares | Notice Value | Planned Sale | Broker | Plan | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-21 | Vassil Jonathan | Officer | 85,280 | $3.10M | 2026-08-21 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-19 | Vassil Jonathan | Officer | 13,931 | $501.7K | 2026-08-19 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-11 | Vassil Jonathan | Officer | 13,797 | $496.9K | 2026-08-11 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-10 | Narang Aman | Officer, Director | 119,843 | $4.24M | 2026-08-10 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-10 | Gomez Elena | Officer | 5,761 | $203.8K | 2026-08-10 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Narang Aman | Officer, Director | 42,105 | $1.48M | 2026-08-07 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-07 | Gomez Elena | Officer | 2,163 | $75.9K | 2026-08-07 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Gomez Elena | Officer | 900 | $31.5K | 2026-08-06 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-06 | Narang Aman | Officer, Director | 13,510 | $473.1K | 2026-08-06 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| 2026-08-05 | Narang Aman | Officer, Director | 124,542 | $4.40M | 2026-08-05 | Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC | 10b5-1 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 0001650164-26-000113 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-12 | 0001650164-26-000050 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-15 | 0001650164-26-000024 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-04 | 0001650164-25-000334 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-27 | 0001193125-25-250778 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-05 | 0001650164-25-000288 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-17 | 0001650164-25-000230 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-05 | 0001193125-25-135957 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-08 | 0001650164-25-000175 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-19 | 0001650164-25-000066 | EDGAR |
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 0001650164-26-000114 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-05 | 0001650164-25-000341 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-06 | 0001650164-25-000290 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-09 | 0001650164-25-000177 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-08 | 0001650164-24-000383 | EDGAR |
| 2024-08-07 | 0001650164-24-000283 | EDGAR |
| 2024-05-08 | 0001650164-24-000177 | EDGAR |
| 2023-11-08 | 0001650164-23-000369 | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-09 | 0001650164-23-000305 | EDGAR |
| 2023-05-10 | 0001650164-23-000168 | EDGAR |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 37.7 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.5 |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.1 |
| TTM Revenue | $6.8B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.5B |
| TTM EPS | $0.79 |
| ROE | 23.8% |