TSLL Direxion Shares ETF Trust Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
ETF 10.76 DelayedETF quote, holdings, sector allocation, technicals, and options analytics. Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $6.70 – $23.74
- YTD
- -40.62%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 10.78
- Straddle Price
- $1.83
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.23
- Open
- $10.36
- Day Range
- $10.35 – $11.06
- Volume
- 74,643,929
- Prev Close
- $9.76
Direxion Shares ETF Trust Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) ETF
No description available.
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Inception
- 2022-08-08
- Has Options
- Yes
- Expense ratio
- —
- Assets
- $3.5B shares × price, Oct 23, 2026
- Trailing yield
- 9.90% paid quarterly
- Average daily volume
- $595M 30 sessions
- Holdings
- 12 top 10 are 200.0%
- Listed
- Aug 8, 2022 Nasdaq
- Tracking difference
- +4.95 pts vs index, after fees, FY 2025
Moves with. US large-cap stocks (25% of its variance, beta 2.81); Value over growth (10% of its variance, beta -1.08); Bitcoin (5% of its variance, beta 0.25). These factors explain 44% of its daily moves over the last year.
All 12 holdingsFlow historyOverlap toolAll Single-Stock Leveraged ETFs
- Jul 2026
- +$416M latest reported month
- Latest 3 months
- −$465M −15.3% of assets
- Latest 12 months
- −$3.1B −102.3% of assets
View as a table
| Month | Net flow |
|---|---|
| Jul 2026 | +$416M |
| Jun 2026 | +$63M |
| May 2026 | −$945M |
| Apr 2026 | +$381M |
| Mar 2026 | +$338M |
| Feb 2026 | +$1.9M |
| Jan 2026 | +$430M |
| Dec 2025 | −$647M |
| Nov 2025 | −$401M |
| Oct 2025 | −$389M |
| Sep 2025 | −$1.5B |
| Aug 2025 | −$857M |
Net creations and redemptions from the fund's SEC filings, which become public about 60 days after each quarter. Every month since 48 months ago
| Fund | Overlap | Fee | Assets | 1Y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDLGraniteShares ETF Trust GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | — | 1.05% | $3.2B | +7.5% | compare |
| MUUDirexion Shares ETF Trust Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X ETF | — | — | $3.0B | +745.6% | compare |
| MULLGraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | — | 1.50% | $1.5B | +749.0% | compare |
| SNXXTradr 2X Long SNDK Daily ETF | — | 1.49% | $1.4B | — | compare |
| MVLLGraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | — | 1.50% | $1.0B | +257.7% | compare |
The largest other funds in the Single-Stock Leveraged category.
- Holdings vs fair value
- −31.6% 0% under, 100% over · 100% covered
- Price / earnings
- 462.4 0% loss-making · 100% covered
- Price / book · sales
- 16.6 · 14.3 revenue growth +12.6%
- Above 200-day average
- 0% 100% above 50-day · by weight
- Short interest
- 2.2% of float, weighted · 1.9 days to cover
- Insider buying
- 0% of weight had net insider buying, 90 days; 0% net selling
- 13F holders
- +0.5% change in shares held by institutions, latest quarter
- Reporting earnings
- 0.0% of weight in 7 days; 0.0% in 14
Each figure is the fund's holdings weighted by position size, using our data on those stocks, and covers only the share of the stock holdings stated. Positive fair value means the holdings trade below our estimate.
- Authorized participants
- 11 active of 11 with agreements; top 3 did 82%
- Created · redeemed
- $11.7B · $11.2B over the fiscal year
- Redemptions in kind
- 57% creations 57% in kind
- Creation unit
- 25,000 shares
- Securities lending
- authorized, none lent
- Return vs index
- +4.95 pts after fees; +6.33 before
- Diversification status
- Non-diversified may concentrate in fewer issuers
From the fund's annual census filing with the SEC. In-kind redemptions are what let an ETF shed appreciated securities without realising gains.
| Ex-Date | Pay Date | Amount | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-29 | $0.0708 | CD |
| 2026-06-23 | 2026-06-30 | $0.1049 | CD |
| 2026-03-24 | 2026-03-31 | $0.0994 | CD |
| 2025-12-23 | 2025-12-31 | $0.1122 | CD |
| 2025-12-10 | 2025-12-17 | $0.5794 | CD |
| 2025-09-23 | 2025-09-30 | $0.0893 | CD |
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Asset Class | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | TSLA SWAP ASSET LEG | 39.59% | Derivative | — |
| — | TSLA SWAP ASSET LEG | 36.16% | Derivative | — |
| — | DREYFUS TRSRY SECURITIES CASH MGMT | 31.14% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | TSLA SWAP ASSET LEG | 28.52% | Derivative | — |
| — | TSLA SWAP ASSET LEG | 24.54% | Derivative | — |
| — | JP MORGAN 100 US TRSY CAPITAL 3163 | 24.26% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | TSLA SWAP ASSET LEG | 21.21% | Derivative | — |
| — | GOLDMAN FINL SQ TRSRY INST 506 | 20.96% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| — | TSLA SWAP ASSET LEG | 19.80% | Derivative | — |
| — | DREYFUS GOVT CASH MAN INS | 19.70% | Cash/Money Market | — |
| TSLA | TESLA INC | 18.09% | Equity (US) | US |
| — | TSLA SWAP ASSET LEG | 12.10% | Derivative | — |
| Category | Weight | Value | Positions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term investment | 141.96% | $4.31B | 5 |
| DO | -55.85% | $-1694948625 | 7 |
| Month | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | 98.43% | -35.61% | 10.38% | -5.57% | 16.91% |
| Feb | -- | 19.22% | 9.53% | -43.86% | -10.48% | -6.40% |
| Mar | -- | 1.51% | -21.11% | -24.86% | -17.57% | -15.51% |
| Apr | -- | -23.56% | 3.09% | 0.39% | -2.35% | -5.61% |
| May | -- | 39.86% | -4.49% | 47.62% | 21.81% | 26.20% |
| Jun | -- | 39.17% | 22.50% | -19.33% | -2.14% | 10.05% |
| Jul | -- | -7.78% | 14.58% | 1.33% | -49.92% | -10.45% |
| Aug | -5.01% | -3.11% | -6.14% | 19.09% | 27.66% | 6.50% |
| Sep | -7.60% | 1.38% | 48.28% | 76.65% | -3.43% | 23.06% |
| Oct | -10.58% | -29.76% | -11.82% | -4.27% | 19.96%* | -7.29% |
| Nov | -22.78% | 24.32% | 81.48% | -18.20% | -- | 16.21% |
| Dec | -51.59% | 2.57% | 20.59% | 3.35% | -- | -6.27% |
| Total | -70.66% | 189.89% | 106.52% | -3.97% | -39.93% | 36.37% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report - TSLL
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (Confidence Level: 6/10)
Key Drivers:
- Technical indicators suggest a consolidative phase, with a possible uptrend resuming if the stock breaks above the upper Bollinger Band.
- News sentiment is mixed, with some positive headlines on ETFs and a negative article on the SEC's approach to ETFs.
Primary Risks:
- High volatility (beta = 4.47) may lead to significant price movements, making it challenging for investors to maintain positions.
- The stock's high beta may also amplify market moves, leading to potential losses if the broader market declines.
Investment Thesis: TSLL is likely in a consolidative phase, with a possible uptrend resuming if the stock breaks above the upper Bollinger Band. However, the high volatility and mixed news sentiment pose risks for investors.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: The recent news headlines have had a neutral impact on the stock's price movement. The negative article on the SEC's approach to ETFs may have contributed to some short-term selling pressure, while the positive headlines on Tesla traders' obsession with SpaceX and the "All Things Elon" trade may have led to some buying interest.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): Consolidative
- Medium-term (1-3 months): Neutral
- Long-term (3-12 months): Uptrend (possible)
Support/Resistance Levels: The upper Bollinger Band serves as a key resistance level, with the stock currently trading below it. The middle band and lower band provide support at $9.31 and $8.33, respectively.
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14) = 52.52 (neutral)
- MACD: Bullish momentum continues to build, with a positive crossover above the signal line.
- Bollinger Bands: The stock is currently trading in a neutral zone, between the middle and upper bands.
Volume Analysis: The volume SMA 20 indicates a decline in trading activity over the past few weeks. This may be a sign of reduced institutional interest or market fatigue.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary:
- A mix of positive and negative headlines on ETFs and Tesla's performance have been published, with no clear directional bias.
- The negative article on the SEC's approach to ETFs may have contributed to some short-term selling pressure.
Sentiment Assessment: The aggregate news sentiment is NEUTRAL, with neither positive nor negative headlines dominating the narrative.
Catalyst Identification: Upcoming earnings reports and product launches by Tesla may provide catalysts for future price movements.
Market Narrative: The mixed news sentiment and consolidative technical signals suggest a neutral market narrative, with no clear directional bias emerging.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment: TSLL is considered HIGH RISK due to its high beta (4.47) and historical volatility levels.
Volatility Regime: Current volatility levels are higher than historical averages, indicating a more volatile market environment.
Options Market Signals: The IV rank of 16.0% suggests historically low volatility, while the current IV level of 96.1% indicates that options traders expect significant price movements.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $9.31 and $8.33 provide some downside protection, but investors should be cautious given the high risk profile.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: TSLL is underperforming its sector peers, which may indicate a higher risk profile for this stock.
Institutional Activity: Volume patterns suggest reduced institutional interest, which may contribute to the stock's consolidative phase.
Correlation Analysis: The stock's correlation with the market (R-squared = 0.61) suggests that it is highly influenced by broader market movements.
Relative Valuation: TSLL is trading within a relatively tight range, indicating a neutral valuation profile.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $10.29
- Middle Bollinger Band: $9.31
- Lower Bollinger Band: $8.33
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: The upper Bollinger Band serves as a key resistance level, while the lower band provides support.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Upcoming earnings reports and product launches by Tesla may provide catalysts for future price movements.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels should be set at $8.33 to limit potential losses, considering the high risk profile of this stock. Position sizing considerations should also prioritize risk management.
TSLL Options Activity & IV Rank
TSLL IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 80th percentile of this name's own daily history, near the high end of its range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
TSLL Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $240.21M | 59.62% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $99.88M | 24.79% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $50.89M | 12.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Walleye Trading LLC | $7.40M | 1.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | SYMMETRY PEAK MANAGEMENT LLC | $2.83M | 0.70% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | OLD MISSION CAPITAL LLC | $1.40M | 0.35% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $150.41K | 0.04% | 2025-09-30 |
| 8 | Traynor Capital Management, Inc. | $141.60K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $131.78M | 43.46% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $63.18M | 20.84% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $52.07M | 17.17% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $28.39M | 9.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Bank of Montreal Custodian | $20.76M | 6.85% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Trading LLC | $2.99M | 0.98% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | IMC-Chicago, LLC Custodian | $1.97M | 0.65% | 2026-06-30 |
| 8 | TORNO CAPITAL, LLC | $1.92M | 0.63% | 2026-06-30 |
| 9 | OLD MISSION CAPITAL LLC | $113.91K | 0.04% | 2026-06-30 |
| 10 | HAP TRADING, LLC | $15.20K | <0.01% | 2025-09-30 |
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.
Click any bar to view the full quote for that stock.
| Symbol | Name | Weight % | Price | 1 Day | 1 Week | 1 Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | TESLA INC | 18.09% | $391.62 | +5.21% | +6.40% | +9.56% |