VERU Veru Inc.
XNAS
2.21
Delayed
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Expected move IV rank history Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- 52-Week Range
- $2.05 – $7.33
- YTD
- -2.64%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 53.26
- Straddle Price
- $0.93
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Open
- $2.25
- Day Range
- $2.18 – $2.26
- Volume
- 86,578
- Prev Close
- $2.24
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 2% and dividend payments are stable — below that the dividend is a token payout and Gordon (which values only the dividend stream) systematically underprices growth names, so those route to DCF + comparables + market anchor instead.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.96% |
| Beta vs SPY | 0.37 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 6.82% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 6.97% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +86.9pp (IV − HV30) |
| Effective Tax Rate | 21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | +3.0% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Forward Tilt (NTM/TTM) | ×1.03 (applied to P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S) |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $-0.0B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -48.0% |
| Book / Price | 86.6% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 |
| Quality Score | 1/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| SMA 50 | $2.49 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $2.39 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 963.3% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $-0.0B |
| Market Cap | $0B |
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | n/a | 0% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | n/a | 0% | |
| Peer P/E | n/a | 0% | median 39.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | n/a | 0% | median 19.2× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/B | $6.72 | 100% | median 3.5× · 3 peers |
| Peer P/S | n/a | 0% | median 3.9× · 3 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $2.49 | 0% | stability 0% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | $2.14 | 0% | 5 strikes · skew +0.13 |
- Industry (SIC)
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS (2834) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 20
- List Date
- 1990-06-01
- CIK
- 0000863894
- Next Earnings
- 2026-12-16 (After-Close)
- EPS Forecast
- ($0.34) (3 est.)
- Headquarters
- Miami, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.verupharma.com
Veru Inc is a late clinical-stage biopharmaceutical focused on developing medicines for the treatment of cardiometabolic and inflammatory diseases. Its drug development program consists of two late-stage new chemical entities, enobosarm and sabizabulin. Enobosarm, an oral selective androgen receptor modulator, is being developed to make weight reduction by GLP-1 RA drugs more tissue selective for loss of fat and preservation of lean mass, and is planned for a Phase 2b PLATEAU clinical study in obesity. Sabizabulin, an oral microtubule disruptor, is being developed for the treatment of inflamma…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 9.57% | -16.26% | 12.06% | -32.41% | -14.74% | 11.45% | -5.05% |
| Feb | 43.36% | 1.08% | -32.97% | 23.49% | -12.80% | 0.39% | 3.76% |
| Mar | -25.23% | -13.13% | -69.15% | 9.39% | -2.23% | -15.65% | -19.33% |
| Apr | -21.07% | 141.65% | 11.40% | 77.63% | -15.33% | -0.88% | 32.23% |
| May | -1.34% | 26.00% | -26.12% | -32.21% | -3.11% | 4.87% | -5.32% |
| Jun | -9.12% | -7.30% | 21.94% | -16.70% | 0.81% | 31.51% | 3.52% |
| Jul | -15.81% | 8.04% | 5.00% | 6.54% | -17.85% | -28.78% | -7.14% |
| Aug | 26.35% | 28.90% | -13.33% | -7.95% | -34.14% | 23.89% | 3.95% |
| Sep | -4.05% | -24.71% | -30.87% | -15.49% | 15.85% | -1.12% | -10.06% |
| Oct | -3.43% | -0.33% | 23.85% | -1.41% | -24.16% | -12.99%* | -3.08% |
| Nov | -11.14% | -54.23% | 9.83% | -7.31% | -4.62% | -- | -13.49% |
| Dec | -14.76% | -3.65% | -28.71% | -6.38% | -11.93% | -- | -13.09% |
| Total | -37.95% | -4.35% | -85.81% | -35.06% | -76.00% | -2.06% | -40.21% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report
Executive Summary
BULLISH (Confidence Level: 8/10)
Key drivers:
- Bullish MACD signal
- Weak trend regime, indicating potential reversal
- Positive news sentiment from recent headlines
Primary risks:
- High volatility, increasing the risk of significant price movements
- Limited earnings data available to assess the company's financial performance
Investment thesis: VERU is poised for a potential rebound due to its weak trend regime and positive news sentiment. However, the high volatility and limited earnings data make it essential to closely monitor the stock's price action and news headlines.
Recent news sentiment impact: The recent news headlines are overwhelmingly positive, which could continue to support the stock's price in the short term.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: Weak trend regime (ADX/DMI), indicating potential reversal
Support/Resistance Levels:
- SMA 20: $2.68
- SMA 50: $2.58
- SMA 200: $2.49
- Upper Bollinger Band: $2.83
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 47.76 (neutral)
- MACD signal: 0.03 / Signal: -0.01 / Histogram: 0.04 (bullish)
- Williams %R: -77.10 (oversold)
Volume Analysis: Volume SMA 20: 231018.25, indicating moderate volume interest.
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent headlines focus on VERU's sale of its condom business and its biopharma pipeline, which could positively impact the company's financial performance.
Sentiment Assessment: Positive sentiment dominates the recent headlines (4/5).
Catalyst Identification: The upcoming Leerink Therapeutics Forum: I&I and Metabolism presentation could provide additional insights into VERU's pipeline development.
Market Narrative: The news aligns with the technical signals, suggesting a potential rebound in the short term.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: Beta 2.27 (vs SPY), indicating high risk relative to the market.
Volatility Regime: High volatility regime, increasing the risk of significant price movements.
Options Market Signals: IV Rank: 13.2% (Low - shows if volatility is historically high/low), indicating low historical volatility.
Downside Protection: Support levels: SMA 20 ($2.68) and Lower Bollinger Band ($2.54).
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: VERU's sector performance is neutral, with the sexual wellness market expected to grow at a CAGR of 4.7% by 2031.
Institutional Activity: Institutional interest is moderate, as indicated by the volume SMA 20 and OBV data.
Correlation Analysis: The stock moves relatively strongly (R-squared: 0.26) compared to the market.
Relative Valuation: VERU's relative valuation is neutral within its trading range.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 20 ($2.68), Lower Bollinger Band ($2.54)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($2.83)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified based on the provided data.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: The upcoming Leerink Therapeutics Forum: I&I and Metabolism presentation (June 27, 2024) could provide additional insights into VERU's pipeline development.
Risk Management: Monitor the stock's price action closely, considering stop-loss levels at SMA 20 ($2.68) and Lower Bollinger Band ($2.54).
Note: This analysis is based on the provided data and should not be taken as investment advice.
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-10 | After-Close | 29.69% | 2.08% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2021-05-12 | After-Close | 4.17% | 0.14% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2021-08-12 | After-Close | 9.21% | 1.75% | 0.19x | Within |
| 2021-12-02 | After-Close | 21.33% | 12.81% | 0.60x | Within |
| 2022-02-09 | After-Close | 2.67% | 3.00% | 1.12x | Exceeded |
| 2022-05-12 | After-Close | 9.00% | 43.96% | 4.88x | Exceeded |
| 2022-08-11 | After-Close | 9.98% | 19.18% | 1.92x | Exceeded |
| 2022-12-05 | After-Close | 15.34% | 2.75% | 0.18x | Within |
| 2023-02-09 | After-Close | 6.20% | 4.53% | 0.73x | Within |
| 2023-05-11 | After-Close | 19.69% | 7.32% | 0.37x | Within |
| 2023-08-10 | After-Close | 3.76% | 4.59% | 1.22x | Exceeded |
| 2024-02-08 | After-Close | 22.73% | 7.61% | 0.33x | Within |
| 2024-05-08 | After-Close | 18.88% | 4.20% | 0.22x | Within |
| 2024-08-08 | After-Close | 54.17% | 1.69% | 0.03x | Within |
| 2025-02-13 | After-Close | 8.36% | 3.01% | 0.36x | Within |
| 2025-05-08 | Pre-Market | 19.92% | 4.15% | 0.21x | Within |
| 2025-08-12 | After-Close | 86.75% | 7.57% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2025-12-17 | After-Close | 19.06% | 1.35% | 0.07x | Within |
| 2026-02-11 | After-Close | 29.35% | 2.61% | 0.09x | Within |
| 2026-05-13 | After-Close | 45.35% | 7.52% | 0.17x | Within |
| 2026-08-10 | After-Close | 12.64% | 0.72% | 0.06x | Within |
Earnings calendar: this week’s reports with expected vs actual moves →
VERU Options Activity & IV Rank
VERU IV rank history, 52-week IV rank and IV percentile →
Volatility Metrics
Options Flow
ATM Options Pricing
Chain Summary
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Estimated net dealer gamma is at the 27th percentile of this name's own daily history, within its typical range. This describes current positioning; it is not a forecast or a trading signal.
Net dealer gamma is an estimate of the aggregate gamma held by options market makers across this name's option chain, weighted by open interest. Dealer positions aren't public, so it uses a standard simplifying assumption: dealers are treated as long the calls and short the puts that are open. Actual dealer books can differ.
Gamma percentile ranks today's estimate against this name's own daily history, from 0% (the lowest reading on record) to 100% (the highest). Raw gamma scales with how much open interest a chain carries, so it isn't comparable across names; the percentile is. The badge marks the bottom 20% as low and the top 20% as high.
Tilts run from −1 to +1 and show how lopsided the estimated dealer exposure is. GEX tilt compares call gamma with put gamma. Vanna tilt describes how the hedge would shift if implied volatility changed, and charm tilt how it would shift with the passage of time.
This card describes estimated positioning and where it sits historically. It is not a forecast of price direction or volatility and not a trading signal. Market-wide view: Dealer positioning screener.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
High volatility - stock moves more than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Hedge fund Jim Simons | $515K | #2600 of 3138 | +137.5% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $194K | #5511 of 6285 | +39.3% | 13F | |
| Rockefeller Capital Management Family office Rockefeller family | $1K | #4576 of 4729 | 0.0% | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
VERU Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $642.90K | 38.29% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $295.47K | 17.60% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $239.44K | 14.26% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $205.33K | 12.23% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $186.55K | 11.11% | 2026-06-30 |
| 6 | Verition Fund Management LLC | $62.60K | 3.73% | 2026-06-30 |
| 7 | Caption Management, LLC | $46.95K | 2.80% | 2026-06-30 |
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citadel Advisors LLC Custodian | $452.29K | 59.78% | 2026-06-30 |
| 2 | Susquehanna International Group, LLP Custodian | $233.50K | 30.86% | 2026-06-30 |
| 3 | Jane Street Group, LLC Custodian | $44.76K | 5.92% | 2026-06-30 |
| 4 | GROUP ONE TRADING LLC Custodian | $17.84K | 2.36% | 2026-06-30 |
| 5 | Simplex Trading, LLC Custodian | $8.14K | 1.08% | 2026-06-30 |
VERU Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-08-17| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-17 | K Gary Barnette | Chief Scientific Officer | Buy (P) | +1,800 | $2.69 | $4.8K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-06 | Loren Mark Katzovitz | Director | Grant (A) | +102,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Lucy Lu | Director | Grant (A) | +104,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Grace Hyun | Director | Grant (A) | +97,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Harry Fisch | Chief Corporate Officer | Grant (A) | +160,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Michele Greco | Chief Admin Officer and CFO | Grant (A) | +164,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Mitchell Shuster Steiner | President and CEO | Grant (A) | +604,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | K Gary Barnette | Chief Scientific Officer | Grant (A) | +160,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-06 | Michael L Rankowitz | Director | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-09 | Mitchell Shuster Steiner | President and CEO | Grant (A) | +100,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-09 | Michael L Rankowitz | Director | Grant (A) | +3,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-09 | Harry Fisch | Chief Corporate Officer | Grant (A) | +27,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-09 | Michele Greco | Chief Admin Officer and CFO | Grant (A) | +27,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-09 | Lucy Lu | Director | Grant (A) | +4,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-12-09 | K Gary Barnette | Chief Scientific Officer | Grant (A) | +27,000 opt | — | EDGAR |
VERU Insider Holdings
7 insiders · @ $2.21| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harry Fisch | Chief Corporate Officer | 801,384 | $1.77M | -$361.3K | 44 | 2026-05-06 |
| 2 | Mitchell Shuster Steiner | President and CEO | 715,039 | $1.58M | -$3.58M | 44 | 2026-05-06 |
| 3 | Michael L Rankowitz | Director | 25,000 | $55.2K | $84.4K | 16 | 2026-05-06 |
| 4 | Michele Greco | Chief Admin Officer and CFO | 9,618 | $21.3K | $50.0K | 15 | 2026-05-06 |
| 5 | K Gary Barnette | Chief Scientific Officer | 2,300 | $5.1K | -$906.8K | 16 | 2026-08-17 |
| 6 | Grace Hyun | Director | 1,479 | $3.3K | $49.3K | 15 | 2026-05-06 |
| 7 | Lucy Lu | Director | 980 | $2.2K | $32.5K | 13 | 2026-05-06 |
VERU Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Aug 17, 2026Directors 6
- Harry Fisch · since Oct 31, 2016
- Lucy Lu · since Oct 31, 2016
- Mitchell Shuster Steiner · since Oct 31, 2016
- Michael L Rankowitz · since Mar 20, 2018
- Grace Hyun · since Aug 11, 2020
- Loren Mark Katzovitz · since Aug 1, 2024
Officers 4
- Mitchell Shuster Steiner · President and CEO · since Oct 31, 2016
- Michele Greco · Chief Admin Officer and CFO · listed since Nov 2021
- K Gary Barnette · Chief Scientific Officer · since Sep 4, 2018
- Harry Fisch · Chief Corporate Officer · listed since Apr 2022
Changes in the last 10 years (31)
| Aug 1, 2024 | Loren Mark Katzovitz became a director |
| May 9, 2024 | Mitchell Shuster Steiner no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| May 11, 2023 | Harry Fisch no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Apr 25, 2022 | Harry Fisch first listed as Chief Corporate Officer in an SEC filing |
| Nov 5, 2021 | Michele Greco listed as Chief Admin Officer and CFO (previously CAO and CFO) in SEC filings |
| Aug 11, 2020 | Grace Hyun became a director |
| May 21, 2019 | Michele Greco listed as CAO and CFO (previously Chief Admin Officer & CFO) in SEC filings |
| Jan 2, 2019 | Charles T Todd Jr became CEO of FHC Division |
| Sep 4, 2018 | K Gary Barnette became Chief Scientific Officer |
| May 4, 2018 | Michele Greco listed as Chief Admin Officer & CFO (previously Executive VP of Finance) in SEC filings |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Robert Getzenberg became Chief Scientific Officer |
| Mar 20, 2018 | Michael L Rankowitz became a director |
| Jan 16, 2018 | Michele Greco first listed as Executive VP of Finance in an SEC filing |
| Mar 16, 2017 | Jesus Socorro became a director |
| Feb 28, 2017 | Daniel Haines listed as Chief Financial Officer (previously CFO and COO) in SEC filings |
| Jan 1, 2017 | Brian J. Groch became Chief Commercial Officer |
| Nov 2, 2016 | O B Parrish no longer listed as Chief Executive Officer in SEC filings |
| Nov 2, 2016 | Michele Greco reported in an SEC filing no longer being Exec. VP and CFO |
| Nov 2, 2016 | Martin Clifford Tayler reported in an SEC filing no longer being Exec. VP of Global Operations |
| Nov 2, 2016 | Donna Felch reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Mitchell Shuster Steiner became a director |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Mitchell Shuster Steiner became a 10% owner |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Mitchell Shuster Steiner became President and CEO |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Mario Eisenberger became a director |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Lucy Lu became a director |
| Oct 31, 2016 | K&H Fisch Family Partners, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Harry Fisch became a director |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Harry Fisch became a 10% owner |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Georges Makhoul became a director |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Elgar Peerschke became a director |
| Oct 31, 2016 | Daniel Haines became CFO and COO |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (12)
- Mario Eisenberger · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Oct 2, 2024
- Jesus Socorro · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 17, 2020
- Charles T Todd Jr · Last reported as CEO of FHC Division in an SEC filing dated Jan 4, 2019
- David R Bethune · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Nov 1, 2018
- O B Parrish · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Jun 29, 2018
- Mary Margaret Frank · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 4, 2018
- Robert Getzenberg · Last reported as Chief Scientific Officer in an SEC filing dated May 4, 2018
- Daniel Haines · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 18, 2017
- Brian J. Groch · Last reported as Chief Commercial Officer in an SEC filing dated Dec 18, 2017
- Elgar Peerschke · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 4, 2017
- Georges Makhoul · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 4, 2017
- K&H Fisch Family Partners, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Dec 6, 2016
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
Quarterly figures (12 quarters)
| Quarter | Period End | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Op. Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 '26 | 2026-03-31 | — | $-2.74M | $-0.12 | $-8.91M |
| Q1 '26 | 2025-12-31 | — | $-5.33M | $-0.26 | $-6.17M |
| Q4 '25 | 2025-09-30 | — | $1.45M | $0.10 | $-5.49M |
| Q3 '25 | 2025-06-30 | — | $-7.33M | $-0.50 | $-5.48M |
| Q2 '25 | 2025-03-31 | — | $-7.90M | $-0.54 | $-7.74M |
| Q1 '25 | 2024-12-31 | — | $-8.95M | $-0.61 | $-11.33M |
| Q4 '24 | 2024-09-30 | $6.66M | $-8.53M | $-0.57 | $-4.37M |
| Q3 '24 | 2024-06-30 | — | $-10.97M | $-0.75 | $-5.65M |
| Q2 '24 | 2024-03-31 | — | $-10.03M | $-0.70 | $-5.65M |
| Q1 '24 | 2023-12-31 | — | $-8.28M | $-0.80 | $-6.02M |
| Q4 '23 | 2023-09-30 | $3.86M | $-8.13M | $-0.80 | $-9.49M |
| Q3 '23 | 2023-06-30 | $3.34M | $-12.52M | $-1.40 | $-18.43M |
Ratios derived from TTM financials and the current market price, sampled daily. History chart shows how expensive the stock is today relative to its own recent past.
- P/E — price / TTM earnings. Rough market rule: 10–15 value, 15–25 market, >30 growth/premium. Negative when earnings are negative.
- P/B — price / book value. Useful for financials and asset-heavy names; meaningless for asset-light software.
- P/S — price / TTM revenue. Useful when earnings are negative or noisy (early-stage growth).
- EV/EBITDA — capital-structure-neutral. <10 cheap, 10–15 reasonable, >20 rich. Good for comparing across leverage profiles.
- EV/Sales — like P/S but accounts for debt + cash. Compare within sector.
- ROE — return on equity. >15% strong, >25% exceptional. Caution: high leverage inflates ROE.
- ROA — return on assets. Leverage-neutral; >5% solid, >10% exceptional.
- Div Yield — annual dividend / price. Compare to 10Y Treasury; sustained yield >6% often signals distress.
- FCF Yield — free cash flow / market cap. >5% is attractive; negative means burning cash.
- Debt/Equity — leverage. <1 conservative, >2 aggressive. Sector-dependent (utilities naturally high, tech low).
- Current Ratio — short-term liquidity. >1.5 comfortable, <1 raises short-term solvency flags.
- Compare current level to the 3-year band: near the high end = relatively expensive; near the low = relatively cheap.
- Multiples expanding while earnings are flat = sentiment-driven rally.
- Multiples compressing while earnings grow = value coming from fundamentals.
Regulatory short-interest reports publish on a bi-weekly settlement cadence; short-volume is reported daily by the trade-reporting facilities. Float is derived from insider-ownership filings.
- Short Interest — total shares currently sold short as of the settlement date. Lags real time by ~8 business days.
- SI % of Float — short interest / free float. The key crowding metric.
- Days to Cover — short interest / avg daily volume. How many full trading days it would take shorts to buy back. High DTC + catalyst = squeeze fuel.
- Short Vol Ratio — today's short-sale volume / total volume. Intraday selling pressure proxy (not the same as short interest).
- Free Float — shares available for public trading (total shares minus insider / restricted).
- Float % — free float / shares outstanding. <50% = tightly held, more prone to squeezes.
- SI % of Float < 5% — typical, no particular signal.
- 5–15% — elevated; watch for catalysts (earnings, guidance, macro).
- 15–30% — heavily shorted; tight-float names in this range have produced notable squeezes historically.
- >30% — extreme; borrow is likely expensive and squeeze risk is material.
- Days to Cover > 5 combined with high SI% amplifies squeeze potential.
- Trend matters more than level. Rapidly rising short interest often precedes negative catalysts or heavy hedging.
- A sudden drop in SI after a rally may indicate a squeeze in progress.
Short interest is reported mid-month and end-of-month; short volume is daily.