YHC LQR House Inc. Common Stock
XNAS
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

- Industry (SIC)
- BEVERAGES (2080) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 4
- List Date
- 2023-08-10
- CIK
- 0001843165
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- Headquarters
- Miami Beach, FL
- Homepage
- https://www.lqrhouse.com
LQR House Inc intends to become the full-service digital marketing and brand development face of the alcoholic beverage space. It also intends to integrate the supply, sales, and marketing facets of the alcoholic beverage space into one easy-to-use platform and become the one-stop shop for everything related to alcohol. The company's primary business includes the development of premium limited-batch spirit brands, establishing an exclusive wine club, and marketing internal and external brands through an exclusive agreement with a United States-based e-commerce portal. It believes that the mark…
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -22.97% | -6.00% | -14.48% |
| Feb | -- | 40.91% | 1.03% | 20.97% |
| Mar | -- | -87.80% | 11.37% | -38.21% |
| Apr | -- | -70.69% | -17.59% | -44.14% |
| May | -- | -31.18% | 1.48% | -14.85% |
| Jun | -- | 15.75% | -91.13% | -37.69% |
| Jul | -- | -30.00% | -60.00% | -45.00% |
| Aug | -- | -31.62% | -14.51% | -23.07% |
| Sep | -- | 0.00% | -13.51% | -6.75% |
| Oct | -- | 10.87% | 90.62%* | 50.75% |
| Nov | -- | 9.88% | -- | 9.88% |
| Dec | 3.85% | -11.76% | -- | -3.96% |
| Total | 3.85% | -98.41% | -95.58% | -63.38% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for YHC:
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: BEARISH (confidence level: 6/10) Key Drivers: Negative technical signals, bearish momentum, and high volatility. Primary Risks: Potential breakdown below $0.72 support, negative news sentiment impacting price. Investment Thesis: Awaiting a bullish catalyst to break above $0.85 resistance. Recent News Sentiment Impact: Positive news headlines (12 Communication Services Stocks Moving In Friday's After-Market Session and ECARX’s Cloudpeak® Hypervisor Receives ISO 26262 ASIL-D Certification) have had limited impact on the stock price, as the market remains cautious.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: BEARISH SHORT-TERM (1-4 weeks), NEUTRAL MEDIUM-TERM (1-3 months) Support/Resistance Levels: Key price levels from moving averages and technical patterns: * $0.85 resistance (SMA 50) * $0.72 support (Bollinger Bands lower band) Momentum Signals: * RSI interpretation: NEUTRAL (40.31) * MACD signal: BEARISH (Histogram -0.02) * Bollinger Bands position: NEUTRAL Volume Analysis: Volume trends and institutional interest signals: * Volume SMA 20: 444158.98 (neutral) * On-Balance Volume (OBV): -21406448.71 (bearish)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: Positive news headlines on communication services stocks and ECARX's Cloudpeak Hypervisor ISO 26262 certification. Sentiment Assessment: POSITIVE (aggregate sentiment of recent news articles) Catalyst Identification: No earnings or product launch catalysts in the near term. Market Narrative: The market remains cautious, as positive news has had limited impact on the stock price.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Interpretation: HIGH RISK (beta 1.16 and volatility 2.32) Volatility Regime: CURRENT VOLATILITY IS HIGHER THAN HISTORICAL LEVELS Options Market Signals: * IV rank: N/A * Put/call ratios: N/A * Unusual activity: N/A Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations: * $0.72 support (Bollinger Bands lower band) * $0.68 support (2 standard deviations below mean)
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: The communication services sector has been performing relatively well, with some stocks showing strength. Institutional Activity: No notable institutional activity in the recent past. Correlation Analysis: YHC's price movement is positively correlated with the market, with an R-squared value of 0.06. Relative Valuation: YHC is trading within a range, neither overbought nor oversold.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: * $0.85 resistance (SMA 50) * $0.72 support (Bollinger Bands lower band) Breakout/Breakdown Levels: * Break above $0.85 for a potential uptrend Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No earnings or product launch catalysts in the near term. Risk Management: Consider stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations: * Stop-loss below $0.68 (2 standard deviations below mean) * Position sizing based on volatility and risk tolerance
Overall, my analysis suggests that YHC is in a bearish trend with high volatility, and it's essential to prioritize downside protection and risk management.
YHC Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Negative beta - stock moves opposite to market
YHC Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
YHC Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-12-19| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-19 | Yilin Lu | President | Mixed | +2,000,179 | $0.90 | $1.80M | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-02 | Yilin Lu | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Lijun Chen | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Hong Chun Yeung | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Sean Dollinger | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Exer (M) | +90 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-10-02 | Jing Lu | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-22 | Robert Leshner | — | — | — | EDGAR | ||
| 2025-07-21 | George Patrick Lambeth | 10%+ Owner | Sell (S) | −180,000 | $3.04 | -$546.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-02 | Jing Lu | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | Sean Dollinger | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | Exer (M) | +89 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | Yilin Lu | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | Hong Chun Yeung | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-07-02 | Lijun Chen | Director | Exer (M) | +179 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-04-07 | David E. Lazar | President | Award (A) | +100,000 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2025-04-02 | James P. O'Brien | Director | Exer (M) | +156 | — | EDGAR |
YHC Insider Holdings
7 insiders · @ $2.44| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Leshner | 5,927 | $14.5K | $0 | 1 | 2025-07-22 | |
| 2 | David E. Lazar | President | 29 | $71 | $0 | 1 | 2025-04-07 |
| 3 | Sean Dollinger | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 29 | $71 | $0 | 4 | 2025-10-02 |
| 4 | Jing Lu | Director | 5 | $12 | $0 | 3 | 2025-10-02 |
| 5 | Lijun Chen | Director | 5 | $12 | $0 | 3 | 2025-10-02 |
| 6 | Hong Chun Yeung | Director | 5 | $12 | $0 | 3 | 2025-10-02 |
| 7 | Yilin Lu | President | 5 | $12 | $1.80M | 4 | 2025-12-19 |
YHC Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Dec 19, 2025Directors 5
- Alexandra Hoffman · since Aug 9, 2023
- Sean Dollinger · since Aug 9, 2023
- Hong Chun Yeung · since Dec 19, 2024
- Lijun Chen · since Dec 19, 2024
- Jing Lu · on file since Apr 2025
Officers 1
- Sean Dollinger · Chief Executive Officer · since Aug 9, 2023
10% owners 3
- Diveroli Investment Group LLC (entity) · since Jun 27, 2025
- George Patrick Lambeth · since Jul 14, 2025
- Kingbird Ventures LLC (entity) · since Jun 27, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (39)
| Jun 4, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Yilin Lu from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jun 4, 2026 | The company announced the departure of Yilin Lu as President in an SEC filing |
| Dec 19, 2025 | Yilin Lu first listed as President in an SEC filing |
| Oct 15, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Jing Lu from the board in an SEC filing |
| Jul 22, 2025 | Robert Leshner reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 14, 2025 | Robert Leshner became a 10% owner |
| Jul 14, 2025 | George Patrick Lambeth became a 10% owner |
| Jun 27, 2025 | Kingbird Ventures LLC became a 10% owner |
| Jun 27, 2025 | Diveroli Investment Group LLC became a 10% owner |
| Apr 7, 2025 | David E. Lazar reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Apr 7, 2025 | David E. Lazar reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Apr 7, 2025 | David E. Lazar reported in an SEC filing no longer being President |
| Apr 2, 2025 | Jing Lu first on file as a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Yilin Lu became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | The company announced the departure of James C. Huber from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 19, 2024 | The company announced the departure of Gary L Herman from the board in an SEC filing |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Lijun Chen became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Jing Lu became a director |
| Dec 19, 2024 | Hong Chun Yeung became a director |
| Oct 16, 2024 | Jatinder Dhaliwal reported in an SEC filing no longer being a director |
| Oct 16, 2024 | Avraham Ben-Tzvi became a director |
| Oct 15, 2024 | David E. Lazar became a director |
| Oct 15, 2024 | David E. Lazar became a 10% owner |
| Oct 15, 2024 | David E. Lazar became President |
| Dec 21, 2023 | Sean Dollinger no longer listed as a 10% owner in SEC filings |
| Sep 25, 2023 | The company announced the departure of Darren Collins from the board in an SEC filing |
| Aug 21, 2023 | Jatinder Dhaliwal became a director |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Sean Dollinger became a director |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Sean Dollinger became a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Sean Dollinger became Chief Executive Officer |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Kumar Abhishek became Chief Financial Officer |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Kbros, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Aug 9, 2023 | James P. O'Brien became a director |
| Aug 9, 2023 | James C. Huber became a director |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Jaclyn Hoffman became Chief Marketing Officer |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Guy Dollinger became a director |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Gary L Herman became a director |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Darren Collins became a director |
| Aug 9, 2023 | Alexandra Hoffman became a director |
- Prev
- 1
Not reported recently (6)
- James P. O'Brien · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Apr 2, 2025
- Avraham Ben-Tzvi · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Dec 19, 2024
- Guy Dollinger · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated Aug 14, 2023
- Kumar Abhishek · Last reported as Chief Financial Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 14, 2023
- Kbros, LLC · Last reported as a 10% owner in an SEC filing dated Aug 14, 2023
- Jaclyn Hoffman · Last reported as Chief Marketing Officer in an SEC filing dated Aug 14, 2023
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | Vanguard | 0.00% | $2,563 | — | 2026-09-30 |
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.