ABUF vs BUFQ

Aptus Laddered Buffer ETF against FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
70 bp
ABUF is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

ABUFBUFQ
FundAptus Laddered Buffer ETFFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
IssuerAptusFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.30%1.00%
Assets$7.4M$1.7B
Average daily dollar volume$161K$8.6M
ListedMar 31, 2026Jun 15, 2022
FrenzyCap score3533
1-month return+2.0%+3.4%
3-month return+3.6%+5.2%
Year to date—+14.2%
1-year return—+16.7%
30-day volatility4.6%6.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.5%−5.4%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings55
Top 10 weight99.8%99.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$6.7M thru Jul 2026+$155M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of ABUF · 0% of BUFQ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · ABUF holdings · BUFQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.