ABXB vs BDBT

Abacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETF against Bluemonte Core Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
39 bp
BDBT is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.4 pts
ABXB is ahead
Larger fund
BDBT
$448M

Side by side

ABXBBDBT
FundAbacus Flexible Bond Leaders ETFBluemonte Core Bond ETF
IssuerAbacusBluemonte
CategoryMultisector BondCore Bond
Expense ratio0.62%0.23%
Assets$1.9M$448M
Average daily dollar volume$3K$1.6M
ListedDec 7, 2020Jun 20, 2025
FrenzyCap score740
1-month return−2.1%−1.1%
3-month return−2.6%−2.9%
Year to date−4.8%−4.8%
1-year return−5.0%−5.4%
30-day volatility4.5%4.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.8%−6.7%
Trailing 12-month yield4.84%4.08%
Holdings96
Top 10 weight99.3%99.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$491K thru Jul 2026+$41M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

17% of ABXB · 15% of BDBT
HoldingABXBBDBT
MBB17.36%15.12%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · ABXB holdings · BDBT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.