ACRT vs CAIQ

ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF against Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
CAIQ
$286M

Side by side

ACRTCAIQ
FundProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETFCalamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
IssuerProSharesCalamos
CategoryPut Write & Other IncomePut Write & Other Income
Expense ratio—0.74%
Assets—$286M
Average daily dollar volume$39K$6.2M
ListedAug 13, 2026Nov 19, 2025
FrenzyCap score045
1-month return−5.6%+3.5%
3-month return—+0.3%
Year to date—+1.8%
1-year return——
30-day volatility12.0%15.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−11.7%−11.9%
Trailing 12-month yield—14.60%
Holdings23
Top 10 weight100.0%84.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$131M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 9, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of ACRT · 0% of CAIQ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · ACRT holdings · CAIQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.