ACYB vs BUFQ

FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Buffer & Resilient Income ETF against FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

ACYBBUFQ
FundFT Vest Laddered Autocallable Buffer & Resilient Income ETFFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
IssuerFT VestFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio—1.00%
Assets—$1.7B
Average daily dollar volume$122K$8.6M
ListedOct 7, 2026Jun 15, 2022
FrenzyCap score—33
1-month return—+3.4%
3-month return—+5.2%
Year to date—+14.2%
1-year return—+16.7%
30-day volatility—6.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year0.0%−5.4%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings—5
Top 10 weight—99.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$155M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · ACYB holdings · BUFQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.