AICH vs BBJP

China AI ETF against JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BBJP
$19.7B

Side by side

AICHBBJP
FundChina AI ETFJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
IssuerChinaJPMorgan
CategorySingle CountrySingle Country
Expense ratio—0.19%
Assets—$19.7B
Average daily dollar volume$172K$96M
ListedSep 15, 2026Jun 15, 2018
FrenzyCap score—93
1-month return—+1.4%
3-month return—+5.4%
Year to date—+19.7%
1-year return—+16.8%
30-day volatility43.5%16.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−16.9%−13.6%
Trailing 12-month yield—4.48%
Holdings—182
Top 10 weight—27.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$988M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—23.2%
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · AICH holdings · BBJP holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.