AOA vs MKAM

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF against MKAM ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
47%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
38 bp
AOA is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.1 pts
AOA is ahead
Larger fund
AOA
$3.4B

Side by side

AOAMKAM
FundiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFMKAM ETF
IssueriSharesMKAM
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.15%0.53%
Assets$3.4B$14M
Average daily dollar volume$15M$6K
ListedNov 4, 2008Apr 11, 2023
FrenzyCap score6923
1-month return+0.1%+1.2%
3-month return+1.5%+2.0%
Year to date+9.4%+5.8%
1-year return+10.5%+6.5%
30-day volatility8.7%5.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.2%−4.6%
Trailing 12-month yield2.15%2.57%
Holdings94
Top 10 weight99.9%99.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$77M thru Jul 2026$0 thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility11.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

47% of AOA · 52% of MKAM
HoldingAOAMKAM
IVV46.97%51.72%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · AOA holdings · MKAM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.