AOR vs ECAT

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF against BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
23.6 pts
AOR is ahead
Larger fund
AOR
$3.9B

Side by side

AORECAT
FundiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFBlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
IssueriSharesiShares
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.15%—
Assets$3.9B—
Average daily dollar volume$43M$8.7M
ListedNov 4, 2008—
FrenzyCap score73—
1-month return−1.6%−8.6%
3-month return+1.0%−12.2%
Year to date+5.7%−13.5%
1-year return+5.9%−17.6%
30-day volatility7.3%24.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−20.5%
Trailing 12-month yield2.64%—
Holdings9—
Top 10 weight99.9%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$124M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility12.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · AOR holdings · ECAT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.