AOR vs ITDJ

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF against iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
24%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
3 bp
ITDJ is cheaper
1-year return gap
7.8 pts
ITDJ is ahead
Larger fund
AOR
$3.9B

Side by side

AORITDJ
FundiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFiShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
CategoryAllocationTarget Date
Expense ratio0.15%0.12%
Assets$3.9B$17M
Average daily dollar volume$43M$171K
ListedNov 4, 2008Nov 12, 2024
FrenzyCap score7335
1-month return−1.6%−1.6%
3-month return+1.0%+2.9%
Year to date+5.7%+13.3%
1-year return+5.9%+13.8%
30-day volatility7.3%11.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield2.64%1.24%
Holdings98
Top 10 weight99.9%99.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$124M thru Jul 2026+$2.6M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility12.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

24% of AOR · 37% of ITDJ
HoldingAORITDJ
IDEV17.15%25.21%
IEMG6.45%11.38%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · AOR holdings · ITDJ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.