AOR vs MKAM

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF against MKAM ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
36%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
38 bp
AOR is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.0 pts
AOR is ahead
Larger fund
AOR
$4.0B

Side by side

AORMKAM
FundiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFMKAM ETF
IssueriSharesMKAM
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.15%0.53%
Assets$4.0B$14M
Average daily dollar volume$36M$6K
ListedNov 4, 2008Apr 11, 2023
FrenzyCap score7223
1-month return−0.2%+1.2%
3-month return+0.5%+2.0%
Year to date+5.9%+5.8%
1-year return+6.5%+6.5%
30-day volatility7.6%5.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−4.6%
Trailing 12-month yield2.64%2.57%
Holdings94
Top 10 weight99.9%99.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$124M thru Jul 2026$0 thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility12.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

36% of AOR · 52% of MKAM
HoldingAORMKAM
IVV35.95%51.72%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · AOR holdings · MKAM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.