AOR vs TSPX

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF against Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
86 bp
AOR is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.1 pts
TSPX is ahead
Larger fund
AOR
$4.0B

Side by side

AORTSPX
FundiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFTwin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
IssueriSharesTwin Oak
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.15%1.01%
Assets$4.0B$273M
Average daily dollar volume$36M$5K
ListedNov 4, 2008Feb 20, 2025
FrenzyCap score7215
1-month return−0.2%+2.5%
3-month return+0.5%+3.5%
Year to date+5.9%+11.6%
1-year return+6.5%+11.6%
30-day volatility7.6%8.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.6%−8.1%
Trailing 12-month yield2.64%1.93%
Holdings94
Top 10 weight99.9%100.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$124M thru Jul 2026$0 thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility12.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of AOR · 0% of TSPX

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · AOR holdings · TSPX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.