APMU vs JMUB

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF against JPMorgan Municipal ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
17 bp
JMUB is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.4 pts
APMU is ahead
Larger fund
JMUB
$8.3B

Side by side

APMUJMUB
FundActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETFJPMorgan Municipal ETF
IssuerActivePassiveJPMorgan
CategoryNational MuniNational Muni
Expense ratio0.35%0.18%
Assets$247M$8.3B
Average daily dollar volume$978K$146M
ListedMay 2, 2023Oct 29, 2018
FrenzyCap score4790
1-month return−1.3%−1.8%
3-month return−3.2%−5.5%
Year to date−4.1%−5.8%
1-year return−4.2%−5.6%
30-day volatility4.3%5.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.4%−7.8%
Trailing 12-month yield2.59%3.85%
Holdings1,2711,983
Top 10 weight11.1%5.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13M thru May 2026+$751M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · APMU holdings · JMUB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.