APMU vs MUB

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF against iShares National Muni Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
30 bp
MUB is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.9 pts
APMU is ahead
Larger fund
MUB
$48.9B

Side by side

APMUMUB
FundActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETFiShares National Muni Bond ETF
IssuerActivePassiveiShares
CategoryNational MuniNational Muni
Expense ratio0.35%0.05%
Assets$247M$48.9B
Average daily dollar volume$978K$1.6B
ListedMay 2, 2023Sep 7, 2007
FrenzyCap score4799
1-month return−1.3%−1.6%
3-month return−3.2%−5.4%
Year to date−4.1%−5.6%
1-year return−4.2%−5.1%
30-day volatility4.3%5.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.4%−7.9%
Trailing 12-month yield2.59%3.38%
Holdings1,2717,450
Top 10 weight11.1%1.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13M thru May 2026+$2.4B thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—6.1%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · APMU holdings · MUB holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.